Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Rick Perry Attacks Defense Bill for Troops Overseas


by: Phillip Martin, Progress Texas

Tue Dec 22, 2009 at 01:50 PM CST


Rick Perry owes American men and women an apology for treating them as collateral to his gutless political campaign. Perry's statement in support of blocking the defense spending bill is Republican primary rhetoric at its worst. I demand that Rick Perry apologize to the brave men and women who are defending us overseas so he can have the freedom to speak his cowardly mind.

--Texas Democratic Party Chairman, Boyd Richie (Source)

Every crazy move Rick Perry makes to the right only makes it that much harder for him to swing back to the center in the general election. His latest anti-Washington zeal shows that he has no limits to what he will do -- no matter how big of an overreach it may be -- including advocating against supporting our troops. Moreover, he will continue to get away with such statements and positionings so long as everyone focuses solely on the political process of his actions, and ignores the policy implications of his valueless statements.

Last week, Republican Senators in Congress were stalling the health care legislation by attempting to filibuster a defense spending bill, which needed to be voted on before they could move on to the health care legislation. The bill, which received huge bipartisan support in the House, contained the following:

  • More than $100 billion operations and maintenance, and military personnel requirements for ongoing military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, and to support preparations to continue withdrawal from Iraq.
  • More than $23 billion for equipment used by our service members in Iraq and Afghanistan – including critical funds to accelerate the deployment of new mine-resistant vehicles
  • More than $150 billion to increase readiness and training of our troops.
  • Nearly $30 billion for health care for service members and their families.
  • A 3.4% pay increase for our brave service men and women.

A defense spending bill that gives a pay raise to our troops? Should be a no-brainer, right? Wrong. Republicans in the Senate were refusing to vote on the bill, valuing their partisan opposition to health care over the safety of the American men and women who serve in the military. Finally, late Thursday night / Friday morning, Kay Bailey Hutchison joined her fellow Republican Senators to end the filibuster in the Senate. Rick Perry -- forever the political opportunist -- saw an opening, and without hesitation or concern for the policy reasons for his actions, began a massive attack on Senator Hutchison.

I'm not one to defend Senator Hutchison -- there are very real reasons why she is a Republican opportunist, which the TDP has detailed here --  but, I mean, come on. It's a defense spending bill. Republicans want to oppose a defense spending bill? Rick Perry wants to attack Senator Hutchison for supporting a defense spending bill?

From a policy perspective, it is sheer lunacy. We can't support sending our troops overseas and not support giving them the equipment and resources they need to succeed. From a political perspective, it is extremely arrogant. Rick Perry is banking on the idea that he can go to the far, far, far, far, far right in the primary, and not suffer any consequences in his run against Bill White.

Perry is miscalculating on this one. He has Hutchison beat. There's no need for him to go overboard -- there's no risk of Hutchison actually improving her chances in a campaign. I mean, if Rick Perry can coordinate Tea Party activists to march on Hutchison's offices (Source), then why does he need to attack the troops?

The pro-KBH blogs are attacking Rick for this, while the pro-Perry ones support his move. Read each perspective below for their spin:

Here's the Perry video attacking Hutchison:

 

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

I read about this . . . (0.00 / 0)
This morning. What a 'tard. Or turd.

Too bad Perry doesn't support the troops. Maybe he only supports the Texas State Guard (his militia) for the coming secession.


Absurd (0.00 / 0)
This is absurd to say that Perry doesn't support the troops. In fact, its like when Republicans call Democrats unpatriotic. This makes us look small and we'll lose because of thinking like this. In fact, I know a lot of troops that served in Iraq and they've told me Perry was always supportive of them. There are better lines of attack that this. This is weak.  

You're right . . . (0.00 / 0)
It's just too bad that for Perry, politics trumps the troops.  

[ Parent ]
There have been better attacks (3.00 / 1)
And I've made many of them over the years, and will continue to do so throughout 2010.

But in the mean time, I'm not going to sit back in silence while Perry goes around the state telling people that blocking health care reform is worth delaying support for our troops. That is an absurd and disgusting policy position, and I'm not going to ignore it. Let everyone else talk about the politics of his vote. Let the pundits argue over whether he's doing this as a smart or foolish political strategy.

I don't care if this is the Christmas holidays, or if it's smart politically, or what. You don't play politics with the military, which is what the Republicans in the Senate (and Rick Perry, apparently) believe is an appropriate approach to governing. You just don't.

Now, a very great man once said that some people rob you with a fountain pen.


[ Parent ]
No one is playing politics with the troops (0.00 / 0)
And until you've been there you don't really know what you are talking about.

[ Parent ]
wtf does that mean (0.00 / 0)
"until you've been there you don't really know what you are talking about"

Until I've been to Iraq or Afghanistan I don't really know why it's ok to threaten pay raises to the very troops that are serving over there in a purely political attempt to delay a vote on another bill?

Until I've been to DC I don't really know why it's ok to threaten funding for troops in a purely political attempt to delay a vote on another bill?

WTF?


[ Parent ]
That's not a comment (0.00 / 0)
to throw around lightly, Texian.

[ Parent ]
Republicans Do Not EVER Support the Troops (0.00 / 0)
Whether it is sending troops into an illegal war or voting against health care for veterans, Republicans have a long record of saying one thing and doing another.



Political and Social Thought...



to the Left of College Station


Saying one thing and doing another not reserved for R's (0.00 / 0)
Lets look at this bill and the spending bill that the President signed after campaigning on "change" and more specifically curbing earmarks.

The denfense bill, has 1,720 earmarks
The spending bill?  5,224 earmarks

How many earmarks does it take to change a defense bill from an actual defense bill to a payoff for members of Congress?

Wonder if there were as many deals in this bill to payoff D's to vote for Health Care as the actual health care bill?  
 


[ Parent ]
Google "defense bill earmarks" (3.00 / 1)
From the Wall Street Journal:

As usual, many of the top recipients of earmarks in the defense bill were high-ranking appropriators: Mr. Inouye got 37 earmarks totaling $198.2 million, while ranking Republican Thad Cochran (R., Miss.) got 45 totaling $167 million. Mr. Inouye also is chairman of the defense subcommittee, and Mr. Cochran is the ranking member.

On the House side, defense subcommittee chairman John Murtha (D., Pa.) sponsored 23 earmarks totaling $76.5 million, while ranking Republican C.W. "Bill" Young got 36 totaling $83.7 million, according to Taxpayers for Common Sense.

That's 17 percent less in number and 14 percent less in value from last year. (Taxpayers for Common Sense)

Either way, this isn't about pork, it's about urging members of Congress to stand in the way of funding for the military to win a political battle and stop health care reform.


[ Parent ]
Democrats on voter ID? (2.00 / 1)
I remember our side using a similar tactic, delaying uncontroversial legislation proceeding voter ID that was unrelated to voter ID, just to kill voter ID.  If some Democrats had voted in a manner to kill that tactic by speeding up the passage of those other bills, how would BOR and others campaigning against voter ID have reacted?  Just some food for thought.

For the record I oppose voter ID laws, unless it's connected to some sort of universal and mandatory federal ID.  I also think Perry's attack on Hutchison here is unwarranted.

"I love America more than any other country in this world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually."- James A. Baldwin


Voter ID had an endgame (3.00 / 1)
Make it three days and the bill is dead, with three weeks left to do other bills. And at any time they could have suspended the rules to take up any other bill if Republicans (Wayne Christian, Debbie Riddle) didn't object. Which they did.

Dragging out a vote for troops only pushes us into 2010 without a way to pay for our troops in 2010.  There's no "make it to this day and healthcare is dead".  There is just "make it take longer to play politics".  Which is reprehensible.

Rick Perry and Congressional Republicans have seriously lost touch with reality.  They are motivated by hatred.  And let's not kid ourselves - if KBH had voted like the rest of the Republicans, the press release the next day would have been "KBH hates our troops".  Rick Perry and his campaign are in attack mode, and no amount of common sense can permeate that dense shell around them.


[ Parent ]
GOP end game (0.00 / 0)
Perhaps they think they can whip up public support against it to get one of the senators close to the fence to drop their support for the bill.

I agree with you that this is pure political opportunism by Perry, and that it was a heads I win tails you lose proposition for Hutchison.  I have little sympathy for Perry getting attacked for "not supporting our troops", given the crap Republicans give Democrats on that and his stupidity on this issue.  However I still think we should try to be consistent.  Unfortunately politics is often the art of using dishonest means to advance honestly held ends.  

"I love America more than any other country in this world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually."- James A. Baldwin


[ Parent ]
2012 Texas Elections
Texas Elections Previews:
-- Congressional Preview
-- State Senate Preview
-- State House Preview
-- State House: D Primaries

BOR Original Series:
-- Senate Showdown
-- Travis County Primaries


BOR Endorsements
2012 Democratic Primary

US Senate: Sean Hubbard

Congressional Races:
CD-10: Tawana Cadien
CD-14: Nick Lampson
CD-16: Silvestre Reyes
CD-20: Joaquin Castro
CD-21: Candace Duval
CD-22: KP George
CD-23: Pete Gallego
CD-30: Taj Clayton
CD-33: Marc Veasey
CD-35: Lloyd Doggett

Travis County Races:
DA: Rosemary Lehmberg
Sheriff: John Sisson
Tax/VR: Bruce Elfant
167th: David Wahlberg
Commissioners
Pct 1: Franklin or Gonzales
Pct 3: Karen Huber
Constables
Pct 1: Danny Thomas
Pct 2: Paul Labuda
Pct 3: Sally Hernandez
Pct 4: Maria Canchola
Pct 5: Carlos Lopez

State House Endorsements:
HD-43: Y. Gonzalez Toureilles
HD-74: Poncho Nevarez
HD-75: Mary Gonzalez
HD-90: Lon Burnam
HD-95: Nicole Collier
HD-101: Chris Turner
HD-110: Toni Rose
HD-117: Tina Torres
HD-125: Justin Rodriguez
HD-131: Alma Allen
HD-137: Joe Carlos Madden
HD-144: Mary Ann Perez
HD-147: Garnet Coleman

Select County Chairs

Early Voting: May 14-25
Election Day: Tues. May 29


Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On Tumblr: BOR
On Pinterest:
Rick Perry's Rental Mansion

Need A Vendor?
Check out BOR's Progressive Vendor Page for campaigns and non-profits.


Original Cartoons


This week:
"Secret Service"


Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Grading Texas
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Burnt Orange Reporters
Publisher: Karl-Thomas M.
Editor-in-Chief: Katherine H.
Contributor: Phillip M.
Senior Writer: Michael H.
Staff Writer: Adam S.
Staff Writer: Ben S.
Staff Writer: Chaille J.
Staff Writer: Edward G.
Staff Writer: Emily C.
Founder: Byron L.

Read staff bios here.

Powered by: SoapBlox