Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
January 11, 2006Gammage Criticized For Congressional Voting Record on AbortionBy Vince Leibowitz[Author's Note: Evidently Jim and I were typing our posts on this topic at the same time, though my post has a much later time stamp. Of course, his was longer. Anyway, I didn't see it when I read the blog before I posted, so sorry, Jim, for stealing your thunder.] In the first major controversy of the Democratic Primary race for governor, the Austin American Statesman reports that the Chris Bell campaign is circulating a letter criticizing Gammage for his voting record on abortion in Congress. The letter is signed by a dozen abortion-rights activists including the formitible Sarah Weddington, the lawyer who argued Roe v. Wade before the U.S. Supreme Court as well as Peggy Romberg, executive director of the Women's Health and Family Planning Association of Texas; and Heather Paffe, political director of the Texas Association of Planned Parenthood Affiliates. According to the Statesman, Bell aides said the women signed the letter as individuals and not on behalf of their groups. The Statesman notes:
Given that the 95th Congress, in which Gammage served, was a couple decades ago, it's not surprising no one is able to cite any votes. The Congressional Record isn't avaliable online for that period. However, 1978 was the year the Department of Health, Education and Welfare announced it would finance abortions for indigent rape and incest victims if such incidents were reported to law enforcement within 60 days. Personally, I Googled everything I could think of to try to find the voting records of the 95th and just couldn't find anything of substance relating to the type of votes in question. However, I did find an interesting tidbit via a Google search for "abortion" and "95th Congress" via AFF, which I thought was worth a snip here: "A generation or two ago, the Republicans were the pro-choice party and the Democrats were considered the pro-life party," notes syndicated columnist Mark Shields, a pro-life liberal. Planned Parenthood was a favorite charity of George H.W. Bush, he observes--one indication of the sea change in opinion that happened over the last few decades.Posted by Vince Leibowitz at January 11, 2006 06:12 PM | TrackBack Comments
http://www.chrisbell.com/newsroom/010806_gammage_choice Posted by: Jason at January 11, 2006 08:21 PMBe sure to read the post from Jim Dallas (on BOR's front page just below this post). I found it less 'spun" than what was originally emailed by the Bell campaign. I do find it interesting that Bell is attacking Gammage, while Gammage is attacking Perry, Delay and Bush. Posted by: Texas Aggie at January 11, 2006 08:36 PMI must have been posting this at the same time Jim was posting his. Posted by: Vince Leibowitz at January 11, 2006 10:41 PMThank you too, Vince. It's good to get some perspective about the times in which these votes were being cast. If the Democratic House Leadership wanted to federally fund abortion as part of Medicaid, they certainly could have passed it. I guess I'm confused about this whole thing. Is Bell criticizing Gammage because he didn't support federally funded abortion? Does this mean that Bell endorses federally funded abortions? What's the point of this whole 'email blast'? Is the purpose just to lay out some innuendo and then assume we're too stupid to remember or look up what the whole thing was about? I just don't understand what the the whole issue is about. Posted by: Texas Aggie at January 11, 2006 11:20 PMisn't it amazing that candidates go into an attack mode when they feel insecure, obviously Bell has had his feathers ruffled by Gammage focusing on the real problem in the State of Texas, that being Perry and not him tom Posted by: tom madrzykowski at January 12, 2006 12:01 AMPost a comment
|
|