Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
December 16, 2005Chris Bell Rails Against Gov. Perry's Executive Order to Enhance College Readiness EffortsBy Damon McCullarApparently Gov. Perry has just noticed that there is a problem with the the readiness of our high school students entering college. According to his press release, the new executive order will: * A new system of college readiness indicators for every high school, including a requirement that schools report the number of graduates who have to take remedial courses when they get to college, These programs will cost an estimated four million dollars. Former Congressman and Gubernatorial Candidate Chris Bell responded by saying:
Some statistics on college readiness of Texas high school students: In 1993, the year high-stakes testing was introduced, 78 % of the graduating high school seniors who took the state’s college readiness test (the TASP exam) passed all 3 sections. By 2002, that rate had plummeted to below 22 %. Texas ranks 3rd from the bottom in average SAT scores. The 995 average score for Texas students in 2005 was more than 30 points below the national mean. It's all well and good the Governor wants to fix this "emergent" problem, but what happens when these students are all ready to enter college and then get smacked with a $3600 bill for tuition and fees. That's no joke folks, that's how much I pay to take more than 12 semester hours (flat rate tuition plan) in the College of Natural Sciences at the University of Texas at Austin. Earlier this semester, the Advisory Board recommended hiking tuition by almost 10% over the next two years. The recommendation was for a 5.5% increase for the 2006-2007 academic year and then a 3.9% hike the year after. Chris Bell has also spoke out on this by saying that tuition deregulation has been a total failure and that we should but the genie back in the bottle on this issue. Posted by Damon McCullar at December 16, 2005 03:41 PM | TrackBackComments
22%!!!!??? I'm not quite sure that I have read anywhere Tinker Bells college readiness anything? Maybe the tiny bell team should check its facts and be positive for once! At least Judge Bob backs up his attacks with solutions. We need to always provide a better idea when we complain. Run Bob Run! Posted by: hamiltonfan at December 17, 2005 06:23 AMDidn't you read it? Bell has a plan....he is going to make sure the textbooks are not censored because that is clearly what is causing the problem. Wow, what a terrible plan. On the test stats. Oh my God. That is pretty disturbing. Hard to call tests of basic skills high stakes though. Posted by: snrub at December 17, 2005 10:35 AM"At least Judge Bob backs up his attacks with solutions." Some offer solutions. Others, sound bytes. Posted by: Baby Snooks at December 17, 2005 11:17 AMBaby Snooks, True but are Bell's (and poor Jason's)even good sound bites? It's more like they just bite. Posted by: hamiltonfan at December 17, 2005 05:29 PMBiting and after awhile, quite boring. Posted by: Baby Snooks at December 17, 2005 06:08 PMamen! Posted by: hamiltonfan at December 17, 2005 06:26 PM" ... to enter college and then get smacked with a $3600 bill for tuition and fees. That's no joke folks, that's how much I pay to take more than 12 semester hours (flat rate tuition plan)" The real reason why so many colleges and universities have raised tuition and fees is they used their endowment funds as personal investment programs benefitting "insiders" and they lost quite a bit of the endowment funds. Rather than address that, they find it easier to blame "increased costs" and raise the tuition and fees. The UT board of regents should have been called on the carpet in particular. I have yet to see any "heads roll" over the matter. Instead I think the board of regents at one point issued some sort of statement about how all investments are risky. And left it at that. They weren't risky for some of the fund managers - they were in fact "sure things." Posted by: Baby Snooks at December 18, 2005 12:14 PMYou know what Robert...I have ABSOLUTELY no problem paying my college bill...and I do pay them myself thank you. I also do what I please with my free time, thank you. The point I'm trying to make is that I'm the exception and not the rule. There are people out there that don't have the opportunity to attend college not because they are't smart enough, or haven't proven their academic meddle. It's because of their economic status. And saying that they don't deserve to go to a university of the highest cailber because they can't afford it is about the most selfish thing I've ever heard anyone say. Posted by: Damon C at December 18, 2005 02:31 PMI don't think you are an exception. UT is still one of the best deals in the nation and student loans are pretty damn easy to come by. I'll be writing that check til I'm gray. It is a pretty interesting quandry though. The benefits of higher ed accrue primarily to the individual so I don't think it is unreasonable to expect them to pay for it. On the other hand, subsidizing higher education seems about the best money government can spend (see Ireland). It would be better if we actually subsidized people instead of the institutions though. Higher ed is a fricking cash cow in this state and they are rarely held to account for anything. When you subsidize the institution there is a tendency to take on their mission rather than maintain the focus on education. Posted by: snrub at December 18, 2005 03:47 PMUT is CHEAP. If you can't afford UT, then there are plenty of places you can go. Likely if you can get into UT then you can go to A&M for practically free. Many people pay for their college tuition completely by themselves. $8000 a year in costs is not going to kill you. Especially if you cut your cost of living. Most people of that low economic status can find scholarships or grants. The possibilities are endless if you are minority status. If you are a poor white male, then you can just break a leg and claim you are disabled. Posted by: Colin at December 19, 2005 01:36 AM"At least Judge Bob backs up his attacks with solutions." __________ And those solutions are? When he whacked the Gov. he stated what he would do instead. the day he filed. Posted by: hamiltonfan at December 22, 2005 01:49 PMPost a comment
|
|