Burnt Orange Report


News, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas






Ad Policies



Support the TDP!



Get Firefox!


December 16, 2005

Chris Bell Rails Against Gov. Perry's Executive Order to Enhance College Readiness Efforts

By Damon McCullar

Apparently Gov. Perry has just noticed that there is a problem with the the readiness of our high school students entering college. According to his press release, the new executive order will:

* A new system of college readiness indicators for every high school, including a requirement that schools report the number of graduates who have to take remedial courses when they get to college,
* Voluntary end-of-course assessments for technology-related subjects like math and science to more accurately measure student progress,
* An electronic academic records system to facilitate the transfer of student transcripts between school districts and between high schools and colleges. This will reduce paperwork requirements and make it easier for students to apply to multiple colleges at once,
* Summer residential programs at Texas colleges and universities for secondary students who excel to provide enhanced learning opportunities, and
* A pilot program to pay the cost of college entrance exams for economically disadvantaged students.

These programs will cost an estimated four million dollars. Former Congressman and Gubernatorial Candidate Chris Bell responded by saying:

“It took Rick Perry five years to figure out that college readiness is a growing problem, but what’s he’s proposing doesn’t address the real cause. Kids are leaving high school less prepared for a higher education under Rick Perry’s administration because high-stakes testing has corrupted the curriculum and driven teachers from the profession. What we need to get our kids ready for college are higher teacher salaries, uncensored textbooks, and safe classrooms where our kids can learn something more valuable than just how to take yet another standardized test.”

Some statistics on college readiness of Texas high school students:

In 1993, the year high-stakes testing was introduced, 78 % of the graduating high school seniors who took the state’s college readiness test (the TASP exam) passed all 3 sections. By 2002, that rate had plummeted to below 22 %.

Texas ranks 3rd from the bottom in average SAT scores. The 995 average score for Texas students in 2005 was more than 30 points below the national mean.

It's all well and good the Governor wants to fix this "emergent" problem, but what happens when these students are all ready to enter college and then get smacked with a $3600 bill for tuition and fees. That's no joke folks, that's how much I pay to take more than 12 semester hours (flat rate tuition plan) in the College of Natural Sciences at the University of Texas at Austin. Earlier this semester, the Advisory Board recommended hiking tuition by almost 10% over the next two years. The recommendation was for a 5.5% increase for the 2006-2007 academic year and then a 3.9% hike the year after. Chris Bell has also spoke out on this by saying that tuition deregulation has been a total failure and that we should but the genie back in the bottle on this issue.

Posted by Damon McCullar at December 16, 2005 03:41 PM | TrackBack

Comments

22%!!!!???
Gee Whiz!
I guess this explains why when I ordered something at a fast food place that they did not have and had to order something different, the guy just looked at me when I told him I needed the money back for the first thing I ordered. Then proceeded to hand me the money for the cost of the second thing.
He finally had to get the manager to refund me 1.50 for my drink and charge me a dime for water.
I'm pretty sure he never really understood what was going on.
22%?
I hope this test has gotten more difficult since 1993.
It springs eternal.

Posted by: comeon at December 16, 2005 08:24 PM

I'm not quite sure that I have read anywhere Tinker Bells college readiness anything? Maybe the tiny bell team should check its facts and be positive for once! At least Judge Bob backs up his attacks with solutions. We need to always provide a better idea when we complain.

Run Bob Run!

Posted by: hamiltonfan at December 17, 2005 06:23 AM

Didn't you read it? Bell has a plan....he is going to make sure the textbooks are not censored because that is clearly what is causing the problem. Wow, what a terrible plan.

On the test stats. Oh my God. That is pretty disturbing. Hard to call tests of basic skills high stakes though.

Posted by: snrub at December 17, 2005 10:35 AM

"At least Judge Bob backs up his attacks with solutions."

Some offer solutions. Others, sound bytes.

Posted by: Baby Snooks at December 17, 2005 11:17 AM

Baby Snooks, True but are Bell's (and poor Jason's)even good sound bites? It's more like they just bite.

Posted by: hamiltonfan at December 17, 2005 05:29 PM

Biting and after awhile, quite boring.

Posted by: Baby Snooks at December 17, 2005 06:08 PM

amen!

Posted by: hamiltonfan at December 17, 2005 06:26 PM

" ... to enter college and then get smacked with a $3600 bill for tuition and fees. That's no joke folks, that's how much I pay to take more than 12 semester hours (flat rate tuition plan)"
So What?! Spend less time posting on BOR and more time working and maybe you can afford it. You and your family should be in charge of paying for your college education, not the government. I don't feel obligated to pay for your higher education ...

Posted by: Robert Morrow at December 18, 2005 10:51 AM

The real reason why so many colleges and universities have raised tuition and fees is they used their endowment funds as personal investment programs benefitting "insiders" and they lost quite a bit of the endowment funds. Rather than address that, they find it easier to blame "increased costs" and raise the tuition and fees.

The UT board of regents should have been called on the carpet in particular. I have yet to see any "heads roll" over the matter.

Instead I think the board of regents at one point issued some sort of statement about how all investments are risky. And left it at that.

They weren't risky for some of the fund managers - they were in fact "sure things."

Posted by: Baby Snooks at December 18, 2005 12:14 PM

You know what Robert...I have ABSOLUTELY no problem paying my college bill...and I do pay them myself thank you. I also do what I please with my free time, thank you.

The point I'm trying to make is that I'm the exception and not the rule. There are people out there that don't have the opportunity to attend college not because they are't smart enough, or haven't proven their academic meddle. It's because of their economic status. And saying that they don't deserve to go to a university of the highest cailber because they can't afford it is about the most selfish thing I've ever heard anyone say.

Posted by: Damon C at December 18, 2005 02:31 PM

I don't think you are an exception. UT is still one of the best deals in the nation and student loans are pretty damn easy to come by. I'll be writing that check til I'm gray.

It is a pretty interesting quandry though. The benefits of higher ed accrue primarily to the individual so I don't think it is unreasonable to expect them to pay for it. On the other hand, subsidizing higher education seems about the best money government can spend (see Ireland). It would be better if we actually subsidized people instead of the institutions though. Higher ed is a fricking cash cow in this state and they are rarely held to account for anything. When you subsidize the institution there is a tendency to take on their mission rather than maintain the focus on education.

Posted by: snrub at December 18, 2005 03:47 PM

UT is CHEAP. If you can't afford UT, then there are plenty of places you can go. Likely if you can get into UT then you can go to A&M for practically free. Many people pay for their college tuition completely by themselves. $8000 a year in costs is not going to kill you. Especially if you cut your cost of living. Most people of that low economic status can find scholarships or grants. The possibilities are endless if you are minority status. If you are a poor white male, then you can just break a leg and claim you are disabled.

Posted by: Colin at December 19, 2005 01:36 AM

"At least Judge Bob backs up his attacks with solutions."

__________

And those solutions are?
Haven't seen them at the website.

Posted by: Vikas Verma at December 22, 2005 10:36 AM

When he whacked the Gov. he stated what he would do instead. the day he filed.

Posted by: hamiltonfan at December 22, 2005 01:49 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






BOA.JPG


January 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        


About Us
About BOR
Advertising Policies

Karl-Thomas M. - Owner
Byron L. - Founder
Alex H. - Contact
Andrea M. - Contact
Andrew D. - Contact
Damon M. - Contact
Drew C. - Contact
Jim D. - Contact
John P. - Contact
Katie N. - Contact
Kirk M. - Contact
Matt H. - Contact
Phillip M. - Contact
Vince L. - Contact
Zach N. - Conact

Donate

Tip Jar!



Archives
Recent Entries
Categories
BOR Edu.
BOR News
BOR Politics
Traffic Ratings
Polling
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers
D Magazine
DFW Bogs
DMN Blog
In the Pink Texas
Inside the Texas Capitol
The Lasso
Pol State TX Archives
Quorum Report Daily Buzz
George Strong Political Analysis
Texas Law Blog
Texas Monthly
Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
TX GOP Blogs
Daily Reads
College Blogs
GLBT Blogs
More Reads
BOR Webrings
Election Returns
Texas Media
World News



Powered by
Movable Type 3.2b1