Burnt Orange Report


News, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas






Ad Policies



Support the TDP!



Get Firefox!


October 13, 2005

Anti-Earle Ads Running in Austin

By Karl-Thomas Musselman

As locals may have started noticing, the 'barking dog' anti-Earle commercials are now being broadcast here in Austin. Why? Because it's part of a Republican strategy to make the issue of corruption, not about Tom DeLay (because he's certainly not corrupt) but about a District Attorney who's prosecuted more Democrats than Republicans and was popularly elected county wide without Republican opposition last fall.

Watch the ad here.

I think my favorite part is the end of the ad, where the narrator urges people to call Earle (the phone number goes to the office of the DA, I called tonight) and "tell him it's not a crime to be a conservative."

No, it's not a crime to be conservative. But it is a crime to be corrupt or commit criminal acts.

In the meantime, Earle has subpoenaed DeLay's home phone and car records.

Posted by Karl-Thomas Musselman at October 13, 2005 06:47 PM | TrackBack

Comments

Wow. It's nice that the Free Enterprise Fund has found a cause to champion, since their last cause - ending the estate ("death") tax seems to be going nowhere post-Katrina. Those ads mysteriously were discontinued after September 1st, however, you can still find them on the website below the Earle ad.

Posted by: nobs at October 13, 2005 10:27 PM

Here's Tom Delay's office phone numbers. You can call him and tell him whatever you'd like.


Washington Office
Ph. (202) 225-5951

Stafford, Texas District Office
Ph. (281) 240-3700

Webster, Texas District Office
Ph. (281) 557-8855
Toll Free 1(800)759-5748

Posted by: Phillip Martin at October 13, 2005 11:00 PM

I believe that the FMF said Earle was part of a liberal plot to block the "free market agenda." If that the agenda that makes the United States look like DeLay's favorite example of the free market in action: the garment gulags of Micronesia.

What a bunch of assholes...

Posted by: Rip Avery at October 14, 2005 01:03 AM

Sorry, meant Free Enterprise Fund. I get so annoyed thinking about DeLay that I can't even type correctly.

Posted by: Rip Avery at October 14, 2005 01:05 AM

I think this is a good thing. I think it shows real desperation on the part of the RNC who is no doubt collaborating with the Free Enterprise Fund.

The reality is, outside of Austin nobody really gives a rat's behind about Ronnie Earle, but people all over the country are sick of Tom DeLay and they KNOW he is a corrupt and totally ruthless.

The greatest thing about Tom DeLay is that you cannot successfully put him on camera to defend himself, he is too big an idiot and he'll say something totally dilusional and stupid like "I am the Federal Government" or "I'm in the Constitution". He has no choice now but to get his butt out in front of the media and attempt to fix his image.

If the RNC and the Free Enterprise Fund had any sense at all they wouldn't touch DeLay with a 10-foot poll, but lucky for us, they are running boogie man commercials againt Ronnie Earle, a virtual unknown person outside of Texas State political circles instead of making a "real" case that DeLay is innocent.

Posted by: Ki at October 14, 2005 11:01 AM

I'm sure that Westlake Hills will be in open revolt against the Earle-ocracy by the end of next week. Here's a hint, FEF: shred your suitcases full of 20-dollar bills next time. At least you'd get something out of that (hamster cage padding).

Posted by: norbizness at October 14, 2005 11:43 AM

"But it is a crime to be corrupt.."

Half the corruption that exists in this country is the result of campaign finance laws that make the corruption legal. Something Ronnie Earle was investigating in the beginning. Now he seems to only be investigating Tom De Lay. And engaging in what some would call overkill. If you have to keep going to different grand juries to get an indictment, there's a problem with the evidence. And if you want telephone records, you subpoena them before you go to the grand jury. Not after. I've had my fill of Ronnie Earle. A man who until all of this began to unfold, or unravel, I held in high esteem. Just as I've had my fill of Chris Bell. Who I never held in high esteem personally but still put some hope in as a politician who might be capable of rising above it all. Just as I had already had my fill of Tom De Lay, long before Chris Bell went to Washington. It's all becoming a parody of a very bad daytime soap opera.

Tom De Lay without doubt is the sleaziest politician that ever walked the halls of Congress. That said, he's good at what he does. He gets what he wants. And what those who line his pockets and vote for him want. But he's guilty of a crime when a jury says he's guilty. Not when Chris Bell says he's guilty, not when Ronnie Earle says he's guilty, not when you or I say he's guilty. Hating someone is not reason under the law to render a guilty verdict.

And the grand jury that indicted him didn't say he was guilty. Only that there was sufficient evidence to indict him and have him stand trial. Last time I checked, our system is still "innocent until proven guilty." Some of you would like to change that apparently and so some of you need to think about what would happen to you if some district attorney charged you with something and you were forced to prove your innocence rather than someone else being forced to prove your guilt.

Reality is the only way to get rid of corrupt politicians in the end is to get rid of the campaign finance laws in this country that allow the corruption and then feed it. Then you can get rid of the politicians themselves at the polls and that often means voting against your own party which quite a few Democrats as well as quite a few Republicans aren't willing to do. That may happen next year in Ft. Bend County. And it may not. Reality is the constituents themselves may not be willing to take a chance on Nick Lampson. His constituents didn't elect Tom De Lay to create a political machine or to hijack the Constitution, or become the most powerful man in Washington. They elected him to serve them and their particular interests. And so far they seem quite happy with him. And they aren't all "lily white" Southern Baptists in Ft. Bend. Minorities in fact are the majority in Ft. Bend. As for Nick Lampson, do you really believe these special interest groups will not start contributing heavily to him as well? Just in case? Again, you need only to look at the mayor of Houston and what some refer to as the "second chance" fundraiser after the election for those who hadn't bought the access to have the opportunity to still buy it before he took office. They said it was to pay off campaign debt. It was to sell influence. Do the politicians really think we are that stupid? We're not. I'm not anyway.

These ads are just the latest episode in the soap opera. Like everything else, they probably won't play well in reruns. I wish someone would cancel the show and cancel the reruns already running as well.

Posted by: Baby Snooks at October 14, 2005 02:19 PM

WTF is that add for medical liability reform doing on this Advertise Liberally website. The click through is clearly to an organization that sees one solution to medical malpractice: removing patient's rights to redress when they've been harmed by incompetent physicians/hospitals. Sure, some plantiff's actions are stupid--but the DMLR's solution is to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Ever notice how these doctors never want to submit to serious quality control? It took 20 years and several drug convictions to finally get Dr. "Eric the Red" Sheffey's license pulled in Texas--this after he maimed at least tens, maybe hundreds of patients with botched and frequently unnecessary orthopaedic surgery.

Please remove this ad from your site!

Posted by: david at October 14, 2005 03:33 PM

I was wondering how long it would take before someone finally commented on that. Last week I saw that come into queue for approval. I thought it was stupid they'd want to advertise on BOR, wrong audience right? But then again, I figured I'd just take their $25 and let them in essance waste it. It'll be gone on Tuesday when it expires. Just about no one is clicking on it anyways so.

Posted by: Karl-T at October 14, 2005 03:38 PM

I think Eric Sheffey actually filed some defamation lawsuits at one point and threatened to file others. And probably threatened to file one against the Medical Board. That is a very common trick used by attorneys in responding to complaints filed with the Texas Ethics Commmission. "Proceed at your own risk and be aware that my client may sue you for defamation."

I think the legislature closed the indemnification loophole that allowed such lawsuits to be filed against the commissioners themselves as well as the commission but I'm not sure they did. Nothing like a little coercion to stop a complaint dead in its tracks. And nothing more coercive than being threatened with a lawsuit. Just for investigating a complaint.

And the attorneys themselves are not much better. File a complaint with the State Bar and they turn it over to the local bar. As if local attorneys are going to risk retaliation by acting against someone they probably are already doing business with or most likely will in the future. Our whole system is corrupt. From top to bottom.


Posted by: Baby Snooks at October 14, 2005 04:26 PM

Tom Delay and his associates circumvented the intentions of the campaign finance laws of Texas in the same way that George Soros violated the intentions of federal campaign finance reform. They violated the spirit of the laws while being technically legal. The fact that you all hate Tom Delay does not make him a criminal. The ironic thing about Ronnie Earle's peculiar effort to indict Delay is that the person who may face criminal sanctions when this is all over and done is the partisan, inept D.A. of Travis County.

Posted by: Austin American Statesman Watch at October 14, 2005 07:56 PM

Nah, if anyone's facing criminal sanctions, it'll be Tom DeLay, sorry.

Posted by: Karl-T at October 14, 2005 08:09 PM

ASS, oh, sorry, AAS Watch--

Have you seen the ratio of Dems and Reps that Earle has prosecuted?? Look at the numbers, and you'll see what a witch-hunting, agenda-driven partisan Earle is. (Sarcasm.) More Ds than Rs.

K-T is right; Delay will have to finally face the fan and the shit, not Earle.

Posted by: Andrea Meyer at October 15, 2005 01:23 AM

I believe these ads are tantamount to jury tampering.

Posted by: dave at October 16, 2005 06:29 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?






BOA.JPG


January 2006
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        


About Us
About BOR
Advertising Policies

Karl-Thomas M. - Owner
Byron L. - Founder
Alex H. - Contact
Andrea M. - Contact
Andrew D. - Contact
Damon M. - Contact
Drew C. - Contact
Jim D. - Contact
John P. - Contact
Katie N. - Contact
Kirk M. - Contact
Matt H. - Contact
Phillip M. - Contact
Vince L. - Contact
Zach N. - Conact

Donate

Tip Jar!



Archives
Recent Entries
Categories
BOR Edu.
BOR News
BOR Politics
Traffic Ratings
Polling
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers
D Magazine
DFW Bogs
DMN Blog
In the Pink Texas
Inside the Texas Capitol
The Lasso
Pol State TX Archives
Quorum Report Daily Buzz
George Strong Political Analysis
Texas Law Blog
Texas Monthly
Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
TX GOP Blogs
Daily Reads
College Blogs
GLBT Blogs
More Reads
BOR Webrings
Election Returns
Texas Media
World News



Powered by
Movable Type 3.2b1