Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Redrawing The Lines: Growing National Focus on Redistricting


by: Katherine Haenschen

Sat Sep 19, 2009 at 02:49 PM CDT


In advance of the 2010 census, the ensuing Congressional redistricting is already garnering significant national attention. Texans need to pay particularly close attention to this process, as we're expected to gain between 3 and 5 Congressional seats due to population growth in the Lone Star state. Meanwhile, the memory of the 2004 gerrymander is still fresh in our minds, when Tom DeLay and his cronies redrew district lines that flipped the Texas congressional delegation from 17-15 Democratic to 21-11 Republican.

The New York Times reports on a Federal lawsuit set to be filed in Mississippi, which focuses on the discrepancy in population between Congressional districts. While Wyoming's at-large district contains only 523,000 constituents, Nevada's 3rd contains a whopping 960,000. At the core of the lawsuit is the difference in citizens' voting power: a Wyoming voter has nearly 100% more influence on the outcome of the election, and thus more per capital representation in Congress. FYI, the national average is approximately 700,000 constituents per district. From the Times article:

"We have tripled our population since 1910," said Jane S. De Lung, president of the Population Resource Center, a nonprofit research organization that sponsored the conference. Members have trouble staying in touch with so many constituents, she said, and the population is only growing further. "If you can't do it with 700,000, how in the world are you going to do it with 1 million?"

A valid question, particularly as the cost of mounting a Congressional campaign continues to skyrocket. As districts hold increasing numbers of voters, the cost to contact them increases as well. Larger districts, both in terms of area and population, make grassroots campaigns increasingly challenging to pull off. The lawsuit also suggests expanding Congress to at least 932 members.

Meanwhile, a documentary currently in production plans to take a look at what the filmmakers call "the partisan conspiracy of redistricting." The film, entitled Gerrymandering, is set for a 2010 release, and will look at line-drawing situations across the US. The filmmakers have conducted a pretty impressive series of interviews with politicians, activists, and researchers. Hopefully the film can help educate the American public about the process and impact of line-drawing. After all, partisan power-grabs that disenfranchise voters aren't cool, no matter who's doing the grabbing. Speaking of partisan power-grabs, here's an example that hits close to home for those of us in Austin:

An ugly picture of a beautiful city, this map shows how the 2004 redistricting chopped up Central Austin into three different districts. Note, furthermore, that this map was drawn after fixing the 25th District, which ran from Austin to the Mexican border, and it's still pretty messed up. The liberal area around UT is shoved into conservative Republican Lamar Smith's 21st District, while Michael McCaul's 10th District swings down to usurp the Allandale area, and then jumps the Colorado River to grab parts of West Lake. Heck, stand at North Lamar and 29th, and you're at the intersection of three different districts. The lines dilute, or "crack," the strong liberal voting bloc here in Austin. While our city voted over 66% for Barack Obama, only one third of our Congressional representation is Democratic.

Of course, this only underscores the importance of the Democratic Party regaining control of the Texas House in the 2010 elections, in order to have a real voice in the redistricting process. Enter the DLCC's new website, Redistricting Facts. The site is designed to serve an educational purpose, and help voters understand how they might be impacted by the redistricting process. It's a great resource to share with folks who are just getting educated about the process. You can follow the DLCC and Redistricting Facts on Twitter at @DemLegislators and @Redistricting, respectively.

Invigorated attention on our pending redistricting is a good start to preventing the highly partisan gerrymander that happened in 2004. And as well all know, taking back the Texas House will go even farther to making sure that it doesn't happen again.  

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Non-partisan redistricting (3.00 / 1)
While liberals might salivate at the potential to regain control of redistricting to turn texas blue there may be a larger public interest at stake.  We might all be better off if instead of trying to game the system to favor Democrats we support an approach that tries to make all districts as competitive as possible thus encouraging more moderation from all political parties. Public policy is likely to be more wise if representatives are less ideologically extreme and more open minded and pragmatic. The political pendulum will swing back and forth, and more competitive campaigns would help promote more steady and incremental progress. That is why Common Cause of Texas supports non-partisan redistricting as proposed by Strama, Wentworth, and Candidate for Senate District 25 John Courage.
Publicly financed Campaigns to neutralize special interests would help as well.




I agree, and ... (0.00 / 0)
If we claim to be a party that supports everyone's rights then we will support non-partisan redistricting.

Redistricting shouldn't be about trying to squeeze the most votes out of any given area or trying to limit the will of voters in another area (whether it furthers our goals or not). Redistricting should be about trying to give each voter an equal voice in very election ad in every area.


[ Parent ]
Yes and no (1.00 / 1)
If all districts were created as competitive, it would not so much create moderation as those who are hungry for cash and would invest more time campaigning than legislating. And check out the moderates in DC right now, are they moderate, or are they rather just fighting a line between what they know is right and popular by their constituents and what those with the cash that can keep them competitive in their 50/50 seats want (Check the TN-4 poll done by R2K for an example of what I mean along with the Representative's response)?

Non-partisan redistricting is good, I would prefer to have several Safe D and several R seats instead, let the primary voters fight it out. And yes, some 50/50 seats would be welcome, but not too many, they are just headaches.


[ Parent ]
A good point. (5.00 / 1)
I think Strama's non-partisan redistricting board would have gone a long way to solve some of the problems here.

However, I think rather than trying to make them "moderate" or "competitive" (which is as politically-motivated as making them hard-core R or D) the districts need to be compact, contiguous, and relatively homogeneous. Give the people a chance to elect someone who actually represents them.  

After all, in the TX House, I'm proud to be represented by the super-liberal Elliott Naishtat, and he represents an super-liberal central swathe of Austin. Not sure how you could even redraw the city and not include a few 75% Democratic districts.

The bigger problem is the cracking and packing -- the deliberate attempts to prevent these compact, cohesive, homogeneous districts by diluting voting power.  

I'm not a player, I just Tweet a lot: @KathTX


[ Parent ]
Good Call (0.00 / 0)
"Cracking and packing" is by far the bigger problem. Glad my South Austin Travis County precinct got moved into Congressman Doggett's district and out of Lamar Smith's.  

[ Parent ]
Senator Jeff Wentworth (3.00 / 1)
has been pushing for non-partisan redistricting since the mid-90s, obviously without success. Mark Strama has taken up the cause in the House. Their bipartisan effort deserves our full support.

But even if Wentworth and Strama and friends get it passed, a bipartisan board won't solve everything.  Bipartisan doesn't mean "fair to the voters". Just "fair to the parties". Bipartisan boards tend to protect incumbents; instead of cracking and packing to elect more Rs (or Ds), they just crack and pack to keep all the current Rs and Ds in office.

That's nowhere near as malicious as the 2003 congressional redistricting, but it's still politicians choosing their voters rather than the other way around.  


[ Parent ]
Non-partisan would be ideal (0.00 / 0)
You're right, bi-partisan tends to protect incumbents because incumbents tend to select a the commission. Bi-partisan is probably what we would get if we redistricted right now. Everyone in the legislature would fight to save themselves first.

Non-partisan on the other hand would work for the ideal of making compact and cohesive districts. You would probably find demographers, sociologists and cartographers among the commission. Their aim would be less about incumbents and more about voters. You will have many competitive districts that could swing back and forth between D and R depending on the prevailing sentiment in the state and incumbents popularity. You will also have some very safe districts like those in Austin that will be solidly blue.

Legislators would need to be responsive to the districts that elected them. Districts would be more compact allowing campaigns to visit more voters on smaller budgets. Districts would be more homogeneous. Grassroot campaigns would likely have much more traction because they would be easier to organize. Redistricting would be less contentious and probably happen much more quickly.

I personally don't see many downsides to non-partisan redistricting.


[ Parent ]
communities of interest (0.00 / 0)
valid point.

iowa does the non-partisan commission thing and has very competitive districts.

competitive districts force incumbents to gravitate to the middle and represent the entire district....but even more important, it forces them to actually represent the district, be present, be responsive and SERVE.

unfortunately, a lot of "safe" MoCs don't serve their districts very well.  no incentive to be a good member. despite the uproar of this past 60 days, town hall meetings by MoCs are very rare.

if most folks want to have a conversation with their MoC, they better have a check handy.

non-partisan redistricting by a panel of retired judges would being back responsiveness and service to every voter.

our ideas are better and we can win competitive districts (see chet, ciro, turner, stenholm, sandlin).

Please refer to KT's signature.


[ Parent ]
Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On the Go: Mobile App

Is Rick Perry Gay?
Download the book, and decide for yourself!

Read Glen Maxey's tell-all about his quest to uncover the truth about Rick Perry.


Now available in paperback!



The Perry Compendium
Know the truth about Rick Perry's record of failure.

--On The Issues: Rick Perry's positions on the issues that matter.
--In Our Archives: A growing list of everything we've written about Rick Perry.
--On Perry's Trail: Regular coverage of campaign stops, quotes, and coverage.
--Everything Else: Lists, links, and archives from across Texas.

Read the Perry Compendium.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Grading Texas
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox