Home

About
- About Us
- Community Guidelines

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR

Advertisements


Join us for Burnt Orange Report's 11th Anniversary Celebration

Friday, May 2nd | 5:30-7:30 p.m.
Container Bar | 90 Rainey Street
Austin, Texas
Purchase Tickets Here


Greg Abbott Gets Obamacare All Wrong In Interview


by: Ben Sherman

Tue Jan 14, 2014 at 03:00 PM CST


Greg Abbott gave an interview to San Antonio right-wing radio host Sean Rima to kick off the year. Unfortunately, he started 2014 by utterly lying about the Affordable Care Act, and showed his fundamental extremism.

Abbott started by making complaints about delays in the law. Look at the blockquote below:

Sean, listen, we are a nation of laws. Not a nation of men, that's one of the fundamental tenants of our nation. And the reason for it is we didn't want some dictator or king or monarch constantly changing the rules, applying one set of rules to one set of people and a different set of rules to a different set of people. And yet, we are living under the very doctrine that this country fought to escape from.

First of all -- we're living "under the very doctrine" that spurred the American Revolution? That's literally insane, in that it lacks sanity. Abbott can call back when, for example, the U.S. is a colony, the colonizers' soldiers are living in our homes, and/or when bicontinental tea companies are paying (and often not even paying) ludicrously low tariffs to the detriment of the colonies.

To Abbott's dull point, the Obama administration has every right to implement the law of the land in the most effective way possible. It's perfectly legitimate to criticize the president's decisions on whether to delay parts of the law, as he did for some corporations and everyone who wants to keep junk health insurance for one more year, but it's within his purview. The point of government agencies is deliberate implementation of the law. Nothing the president has done has changed the content of the law. Nor can Greg Abbott point to a federal judge who has said anything of the sort.

More below the jump.

ADVERTISEMENT
Abbott and several other Republican Attorneys General recently sent a letter laying out complaints about Obamacare's implementation. The first part is echoing the earlier complaints about alleged illegality, and the second concerns Secretary Sebelius and the federal navigators helping states set up the exchanges. Here's how Abbott described this argument:

And that is one that focuses directly on Secretary Sebelius' negligence and failures as it concerns the navigators, and the dangers that the navigators are posing to Americans. And we offer some specific ideas about what the Health and Human Services department needs to do to make sure that Americans don't have their information compromised by these completely, inadequately trained and equipped navigators, who are signing up, I would say millions of Americans but we don't know how many people they're really signing up.

Read that last meandering sentence again. It makes no sense, and it has no backing. Health and Human Services has reported low numbers, increasing numbers, decreasing numbers, and steadying numbers of ACA sign-ups. It's pretty clear that in an effort to discredit the law -- the law -- and those implementing it, he's just throwing barbs out and hoping they pierce. He calls the navigators "inadequately trained and equipped," which is really a reference to how heavily Republican-led states, like Texas, are successfully kneecaping the navigators' ability to operate. The navigators are not posing any "dangers" to Americans by trying to make getting health insurance easier. It's Republican naysayers like Abbott who endanger Americans' health.

Abbott then refers to a James O'Keefe sting video in which three local Dallas Obamacare navigators-in-training tell someone they don't need to report cash from odd jobs to keep premiums lower. That was an unfortunate and wrong piece of advice -- and the local organization in charge of those volunteers has let them go -- but it hasn't really anything that would indicate such instructions came down from the federal level. In fact, it would make any sense if it did.

And so if they're willing to urge other people to engage in defrauding their own federal government, can we trust these people with our own personal, private information? And the answer, of course, is no.

The facts say that claim is a broad stroke with a dirty brush. It need not faze anyone, and Abbott's willingness to generalize from it is the dishonest politics we all cringe at.

Note that, at his core, Abbott doesn't seem to have any suggestions about what to do about America's otherwise failed health insurance system. We trail the developed world in insured citizens, and all Abbott can muster is half-baked criticism of the Affordable Care Act.

He's running to be governor of the state that does the worst in health care, and he's got nothing but letters and lawsuits against the federal government to point to. Abbott doesn't operate with the same linguistic swagger that Perry does (from the accent to the phrasing), but the simple inaccuracy of his claims and the shallowness of his thinking is the exact same.



Copyright Burnt Orange Report, all rights reserved.
Do not republish without express written permission.


Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

. (0.00 / 0)
Nothing the president has done has changed the content of the law.
- http://www.politico.com/magazi... - that's just one example of almost daily lack of proper enforcement of the ACA.

The point of the executive branch of the federal government is to enforce the law. This is the law. When the president does not enforce the law (eg, does not implement ALL parts of the law), he is breaking the law. Laws are nothing without their enforcement. You can argue all day that the president hasn't changed the actual law itself, but after you're done come back down to earth where the enforcement is what matters.  

"Nor can Greg Abbott point to a federal judge who has said anything of the sort.
- See the above paragraph. Since you can verify what I said as being true in the Constitution...

A federal judge has said the ACA is a tax. One that was so complex and "a good deal" it had to be "passed before we can see what's in it." The American people are not being represented by a Congress who passes laws without disclosing the details of the laws to their constituents. I could equate that to taxation without representation Add to that, the President outright lied about how it would affect us, on record, dozens of times. And then lied about not lying about it after being on record, dozens of times - but its okay, their plans were junk anyway.

"And yet, we are living under the very doctrine that this country fought to escape from."
You have to be "literally insane, in that you lack sanity," to not really understand what he's saying here without opposing it because of political slant.

I like how your paragraph opens up with complaints about "meandering" and leads into an entire paragraph of "meandering."

It's Republican naysayers like Abbott who endanger Americans' health.
- Yeah. They are endangering http://www.christianpost.com/n... , and http://dailycaller.com/2014/01... , and http://www.huffingtonpost.com/... , and http://nypost.com/2013/11/12/d... , and http://www.cnbc.com/id/101262709 , and http://nypost.com/2014/01/14/a... . Thank God the ACA is getting/has gotten these people off their junk healthcare plans.

What do we do about our "failed health insurance" system? First, stop listening to politicians that have insurance companies in their pockets. Health insurance isn't and was never failed. Its access is a privilege whose concept has been abused to add bureaucracy and lack of financial accountability into healthcare. You don't use your auto insurance when you change your oil - imagine how much oil changes would cost. You shouldn't need health insurance for routine checkups and preventative care. Health care and insurance should be affordable because providing it should be simple. Americans should have well paying jobs - the ones that were sent for pennies on the dollar overseas under the guise of "free trade" laws passed by Congress in the pockets of companies who are paying (and often not even paying) ludicrously low tariffs to the detriment of the states

And if you want to be so far gone you don't agree with that statement, then how about we just go ahead and fully socialize healthcare? Single payer here we come.


Connect With BOR
    

2014 Texas Elections
Follow BOR for who's in, who's out, and who's up.

Candidate Tracker:
-- Statewide Races
-- Congressional Races
-- State Senate Races
-- State Rep. Races
-- SBOE Races
-- Austin City Council

Click here for all 2014 Elections coverage

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Texas Blue Pages

Texas Blue Pages
A career network for progressives.

Advertisement

Shared On Facebook

Burnt Orange Reporters
Editor and Publisher:
Katherine Haenschen

Senior Staff Writers:
Joe Deshotel
Michael Hurta
Ben Sherman

Staff Writers:
Omar Araiza
Emily Cadik
Genevieve Cato
Phillip Martin
Natalie San Luis
Katie Singh
Joseph Vogas

Founder:
Byron LaMasters

Blogger Emeritus:
Karl-Thomas Musselman

Read staff bios here.

Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox