Senator Eddie Lucio Re-Files Bill Requiring Adoption Webinar Before Abortion

0 Flares 0 Flares ×

More from the front lines of the anti-woman culture pervading our Texas state government: Senator Eddie Lucio has re-filed his bill requiring women to take a three-hour webinar on adoption before they receive an abortion. The bill, SB 17, was filed Friday.

If it passes, every single woman in Texas seeking an abortion must be digitally mansplained about adoption thanks to a senator who doesn't support access to abortion or birth control.

The bill [text here] does not provide an exception for victims of rape and incest, so if you're pregnant as the result of a vicious attack, Lucio still thinks you'll benefit from his paternalistic legislation.

More below the jump about why Lucio's bill and anti-woman voting record this special session are damaging to all Democrats.As I've written previously, this anti-woman attitude deserves no quarter in the Democratic Party.

Thousands of pro-choice Texans have engaged in these special session and stood up for women's health. Lucio's vote for the unconstitutional back-door abortion ban — not to mention his seemingly endless speech in favor of it — and the votes of several Democrats in the House for the bill blurs that line, and perhaps calls into question whether Democrats really are united in our support for women's health.

After all, not all Democrats seem able to vote against a bill that will likely cause the maiming and deaths of actual Texas women if the bill is not blocked in the courts.

Lucio's latest legislative effort is particularly insulting because it assumes that women can't possibly make up their own mind without a three-hour video to “educate” them.

    Lucio assumes that a mother with too little income and too many mouths to feed can't make up her own mind on the economic impact of an unwanted pregnancy on a struggling family.

    Lucio assumes a date-raped college student hasn't already considered the impact of growing visibly pregnant on campus from an encounter she never consented to.

    Lucio assumes that he simply knows better than Texas women about what decisions are best for their bodies, and their lives.

Furthermore, Lucio seems unable to draw a link between the Medicaid expansion he embraced this session and the Republican Governor he embraced at the anti-abortion bill-signing, who has made it abundantly clear that the poor will not gain added health insurance on his watch.

Eddie Lucio would be wise to focus on actual policies that not only decrease unwanted pregnancy but make it easier for women to afford additional children, rather than cozying up to the Republican lawmakers who oppose both.

It's beyond frustrating that Lucio is not up for re-election or primary defeat until 2016, but in the meantime he needs to be made a pariah in the Democratic Party. If Democrats want women to get engaged and vote for our party in 2014, it doesn't help to have Senator Mansplainer Webinar gumming up the works.  


About Author

Katherine Haenschen

Katherine Haenschen is a PhD candidate at the University of Texas, where she studies political participation on digital media. She previously managed successful candidate, issue, voter registration, and GOTV campaigns in Central Texas. She is also a fan of UCONN women's basketball and breakfast tacos.

1 Comment

  1. I am a Healthcare Administrator but I can’t say I know a whole lot about politics. From a public health perspective, I would like to know why this bill faced so much opposition. I know you specifically ask “not to ask” but considering your response to this bill is practically the only resource available , I would like to gain an in-depth understanding.

    After reading this article I can make some fairly obvious assumptions:
    1. Senator Lucio is not very liked and is considered anti-women. But is this the primary reason for opposing a bill that appears to attempt proper informed consent?
    2. A bill as vague as this requiring ALL women to attend the 3-hour course would be a bit much and I agree that it would not be very fair.

    However, I would like to know if a policy designed to inform women of ALL physical and psychological impacts of abortion would be entirely opposed? You must agree that not ALL women are equally informed of the possible health risks, I do however fully agree that some situations are definitely considered special circumstances (as mentioned above). The bill DID mention these special circumstances regarding minors but I would agree these exceptions should be granted to ALL women and not just a few.

    How would someone develop a policy that makes absolutely sure a patient enters an abortion clinic is properly informed in an effort to protect them, not restrict them?

Leave a Reply

2015 © Skytop Publishing All Rights Reserved. Do not republish without express written permission.

Site designed and developed by well + done DESIGN

0 Flares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 0 Flares ×