Home

About
- About Us
- Community Guidelines

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR

Advertisements


We're Counting On You.

Burnt Orange Report is redeveloping our website for the first time in almost a decade.

We're counting on your support to continue providing you free and frequent coverage of progressive issues that matter to Texans.

Help us build a website that is as great as the content we publish on it.



The State Board of Education: Will They Listen?


by: Michael Hurta

Thu May 20, 2010 at 08:00 AM CDT


Goal ThermometerYesterday, the State Board of Education began its meeting at around 9 A.M.  On the schedule: public testimony regarding the proposed social studies curriculum.  In response to a rally at the March meeting of the State Board, Chairwoman Gail Lowe complained that none of the members offered testimony.

Oh, people need to give testimony for their concerns to be heard?  Alright, then.  Over 200 people signed up to testify at yesterday's meeting.  It started out slow, and many left in frustration.  But 120 still walked to the podium to speak their minds.

So, about 14 hours after the meeting's beginning, they finally wrapped up...
Will they listen?

There were over 70 people who signed up officially in support of the standards, but the opposition had its day.  While a smaller number signed up "against" than in support, many who registered as "other" were really activists in disguise who also were upset with parts of the proposed curriculum.  Eight state representatives arrived unscheduled, too.  As per usual, they were offered an opportunity to speak -- but six of them were Democrats upset about the standards, too.

Those who spoke against the curriculum were from all levels of society -- from a former (Republican Administration!) Secretary of Education (Rod Paige) to high school students who drove in from Corpus Christi.  They came from everywhere -- one student flew in from El Paso.  They had different backgrounds -- African American leaders, Asian-American leaders, Mexican-American leaders, and even the whitest of white people spoke against the proposed standards.

Most significantly, though, the problems they referred to were far and wide.  Whether there was a problem portraying the significance of a cultural movement in America (for example, Dolores Huerta was mentioned many times) or a less racial problem (as a personal example, I mentioned the standard that implores students to "understand the poor record of collectivist, non-free market economic systems") -- time and time again a concerned citizen would testify on a specific part of the proposed standards where the board clearly messed up.

Conservative board members kept asking for specifics.  They acted as if their standards could not be wrong unless the wrong was pointed out in a specific place.  Many specifics were given, such as the examples above.  A lot of those specifics will likely be visited today and tomorrow, and some may even be amended for the better.  But as the large and diverse set of testimonies showed, this isn't a game of specifics. The problems with the proposed curriculum are not simply errors here and there.  They are a trend.

And that, perhaps, is the main reason why a chunk of those against the amendments requested a further delay in the adoption of the standards.  After all, the textbook timeline will not likely be harmed...not with the current budget crises already doing so.  And you simply can't fix that many problems in just two days, can you?  Representative Trey Martinez-Fischer gave another reason to delay the process and let the experts take another look: the law, after all, calls for "direct participation" between the State Board and those experts. Is this direct participation?  And is this legal??

Setting up a structure so that teachers can teach their students history should be easy.  It should be boring and uncontroversial, too.  There should be the basic points that students are expected to cover.  Besides that, though, just let them study history.  And just let teachers educate.

But it's not like that.  If the national media attention didn't already alert the board members to the fact, over 200 public testifiers should have: the people have problems with the state board of education.  The people are complaining to their elected officials about it, too.  I've had Les Miserables' music stuck in my head, and I think a quote is appropriate: "Do you hear the people sing? Singing the songs of angry men [and women]?"  

Alright...about those elected officials...Will they listen?  (tune in at 9 AM to find out!)

ADVERTISEMENT


Copyright Burnt Orange Report, all rights reserved.
Do not republish without express written permission.


Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

NO! (0.00 / 0)
Of course they're not going to listen.  They're saving us from evil liberalism!  It doesn't mater if we don't want that. We don't know what's good for us.


Will they listen? Is that a serious question?! (0.00 / 0)
We all know that they're not listening. Some of them, like Dunbar and McLeroy, and having their last hurrahs before leaving the SBOE. Others, like the usually reasonable Hardy, are scared of the Republican primary they'll have to face in 2012. So no, don't expect anything remotely reasonable from the SBOE this week.

But November is another story. Already, next year's SBOE is shaping up to be much better than this year's. By electing Judy Jennings and Rebecca Bell-Metereau, we can make it vastly better.  


Interesting (0.00 / 0)
A decade ago, an almost identical block on the SBOE chose to push political ideology into textbooks. But, SURPRISE! The block made up of liberals. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I doubt the ACLU/UDems/TFN hacks were out parading around with "Just Educate" signs in obnoxious yellow tshirts, Mr. Hurta.

As long as the SBOE is comprised of people elected via partisan elections, the cycle will continue. When all that matters at the end of the day is an (R) or a (D) next to somebody's name on a ballot, things like this are inevitable.

But go ahead and demonize standards that will teach our children what our nation is - a constitutional republic. Go ahead and allow erroneous claims like "Conservatives removed Thomas Jefferson from the curriculum!" to prevent intelligent discourse. Go ahead and refuse to highlight the difference in the term "separation of church and state" from the wording of the first amendment.  

Have fun campaigning for liberal SBOE candidates who will turn around and try to do the exact same thing to the curriculum, only in the form of an agenda and ideology that you agree with.


Connect With BOR
    

2014 Texas Elections
Follow BOR for who's in, who's out, and who's up.

Candidate Tracker:
-- Statewide Races
-- Congressional Races
-- State Senate Races
-- State Rep. Races
-- SBOE Races
-- Austin City Council

Click here for all 2014 Elections coverage

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Texas Blue Pages

Texas Blue Pages
A career network for progressives.

Advertisement

Shared On Facebook

Burnt Orange Reporters
Editor and Publisher:
Katherine Haenschen

Senior Staff Writers:
Genevieve Cato
Joe Deshotel
Ben Sherman

Staff Writers:
Omar Araiza
Emily Cadik
Phillip Martin
Natalie San Luis
Katie Singh
Joseph Vogas

Founder:
Byron LaMasters

Blogger Emeritus:
Karl-Thomas Musselman

Read staff bios here.

Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox