Burnt Orange Report


News, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas







Support the TDP!





September 15, 2003

Republican Dirty Tricks Revealed

By Byron LaMasters

The former communications director for Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Dallas) has plead guilty to making false statements about Ellen Tauscher (D-CA) when he worked on her Republican opponent's campaign in 1998. The Washington Post reports:

Adrian Plesha, a campaign manager for a California GOP congressional candidate in 1998, pleaded guilty Wednesday in federal court here to making false statements to the Federal Election Commission.

Plesha, who was later communications director for Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Tex.) and now runs the Washington office of cyber-security defense contractor Promia Inc., was working for Republican candidate George Ball against Rep. Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.).

Plesha set up a phony group called the East Bay Democratic Committee, which sent letters purportedly signed by Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.) to Democrats, urging them to vote against Tauscher, a Justice Department announcement said. There were also phone calls with the same message. That's a violation of federal campaign laws. During an FEC probe, Plesha filed a response "in which he denied any knowledge" of the ruse, the department said. He's looking at a maximum of five years in the slammer and a fine of as much as $250,000. Sentencing is set for Nov. 21.


The first campaign for which I ever volunteered was for the campaign of Regina Montoya Coggins, who ran against Sessions in 2000. Sessions still does not live in the 32nd congressional district which he "represents". He switched from the 5th district after redistricting because he prefered to represent the compact, urban/suburban, new 32nd district rather than the sprawling urban/suburan/rural 5th district (you know, traveling to all those darn town hall meetings is a b*tch) in which he still lives. Kenny Marchant (R-Carrollton) wanted to run for the 32nd, but he didn't have the balls to run against Sessions. Now, Republicans want to reward him for his loyalty with Martin Frost's seat, by disenfranchising minority voters in Dallas and Tarrant Counties.

Posted by Byron LaMasters at September 15, 2003 02:13 PM | TrackBack

Comments

Now, Republicans want to reward him for his loyalty with Martin Frost's seat, by disenfranchising minority voters in Dallas and Tarrant Counties.

C'mon, Byron: "...by disenfranchising minority voters in Dallas and Tarrant Counties."? What sort of non sequitir is that?

Are we now to the point that minorities must be represented by Democrats, or by definition they have been "disenfranchised"?

I thought you were smarter than to believe all Republicans are "racist, ignorant and destructive fools."

Posted by: Mark Harden at September 15, 2003 08:24 PM

Mark, I'm not the one that said that Republicans are "racist, ignorant and destructive fools". Don't put words in my mouth. Andrew is welcome to say that for himself, I'll speak for myself. Thank you very much....

First off, I'm happy to see that the GOP maps so far this session do not retrogress minority voting rights in the 10th, 24th or 25th congressional districts. I do think that there are potential racial retrogression in the splits in Jefferson and McClennan Counties, which could be a problem causing Voting Rights Act challenges.

Now, I don't say that minorities must be represented by Democrats. I've said that minorities tend to vote Democratic, especially in this state. By dividing minority communities, as many of the previous maps did to the minority communities in Austin, Dallas and Houston specifically, the voice of the minority communities was either packed into a small number of congressional districts (for example the 30th in Dallas), or dilluted into multiple districts (as was the case with many Blacks and Hispanics in Dallas and Tarrant Counties - current 24th - under many of the GOP maps). Many of the maps punish communities of interest simply for voting Democratic (including majority White areas such as central Austin). Now, thats redistricting for you, and it happens all the time (and I won't go into the unprecidented nature of mid-decade redistricting) except that we have this thing called the Voting Rights Act which prevents minority voices from being packed and dilluted. If that's racist Mark, then I'm sorry.

Posted by: ByronUT at September 16, 2003 12:50 AM

Mark, I'm not the one that said that Republicans are "racist, ignorant and destructive fools". Don't put words in my mouth. Andrew is welcome to say that for himself, I'll speak for myself. Thank you very much....

Whoa - if you re-read my post, you'll see that I am definitely referencing ANDY as the source for that crude remark, and professing my certainty that you have proven yourself incapable of resorting to such ad hominem attacks. Thus, I thought you were smarter than to believe all Republicans are "racist, ignorant and destructive fools."

But I will try to ensure less possibility for ambiguity. My apologies if you felt I had directed an ugly remark at YOU.

Posted by: Mark Harden at September 16, 2003 10:45 AM

By dividing minority communities, as many of the previous maps did to the minority communities in Austin, Dallas and Houston specifically, the voice of the minority communities was either packed into a small number of congressional districts (for example the 30th in Dallas), or dilluted into multiple districts (as was the case with many Blacks and Hispanics in Dallas and Tarrant Counties - current 24th - under many of the GOP maps).

This is, indeed, a more subtle statement regarding the concerns of minority voters in the redistricting process. However, I still feel you preemptively assume that minority interests completely coincide with the Democratic Party, and differ from the Republican Party. Thus, you "prejudge" both minorities and Republicans. I don't think historical voting patterns necessarily prove that presumption of joint interest.

In any case, as Beldar has consistently pointed out, the mandatory review of the map under the VRA will ensure that no minority voting rights are impacted.

Posted by: Mark Harden at September 16, 2003 10:50 AM

This is your post in its entirety - You DID specifically say "C'mon, Byron" - U R addressing Byron.


Now, Republicans want to reward him for his loyalty with Martin Frost's seat, by disenfranchising minority voters in Dallas and Tarrant Counties.
C'mon, Byron: "...by disenfranchising minority voters in Dallas and Tarrant Counties."? What sort of non sequitir is that?
Are we now to the point that minorities must be represented by Democrats, or by definition they have been "disenfranchised"?
I thought you were smarter than to believe all Republicans are "racist, ignorant and destructive fools."
Posted by Mark Harden at September 15, 2003 08:24 PM

Posted by: me at August 29, 2004 09:56 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?








April 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
          1 2
3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10 11 12 13 14 15 16
17 18 19 20 21 22 23
24 25 26 27 28 29 30


About Us
About/Contact
Advertising Policies

Donate

Tip Jar!



Archives
Recent Entries
Categories
BOR Edu.
BOR News
BOR Politics
Linked to BOR!
Polling
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers
DFW Bogs
DMN Blog
In the Pink Texas
Inside the Texas Capitol
The Lasso
Pol State TX Archives
Quorum Report Daily Buzz
George Strong Political Analysis
Texas Law Blog
Texas Monthly
Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
TX GOP Blogs
Daily Reads
College Blogs
GLBT Blogs
More Reads
BOR Webrings
Election Returns
Texas Media
World News



Powered by
Movable Type 3.15