Last week, the San Antonio Express-Newsreported that Texas taxpayers "have picked up a tab topping $40,000 so far for the defense lawyer hired to represent Gov. Rick Perry in a grand jury investigation over whether he misused his power with a veto threat."
Rick Perry is currently under investigation for potential bribery, coercion, and abuse of office. What's being investigated is his attempt to force Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg to resign after her DUI last year.
When the grand jury investigation began, Perry hired the former president of the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, David Botsford, to defend him. Botsford charges $450 an hour--luckily for Perry, he's not the one paying the bill. Instead, that has fallen to Texas taxpayers.
That's right, taxpayers are the ones responsible for footing the $450 an hour bill to defend Rick Perry from possible corruption charges.
Read more about Rick Perry's criminal investigation after the jump.
Rick Perry is currently under criminal investigation for abusing his power as governor--but he doesn't want Texans to know about it.
The Travis County grand jury investigating Rick Perry's potential abuse of power convened on Friday, and Perry may very well have to testify. According to new reports, Rick Perry asked for a non-public entrance into the courthouse in advance of the grand jury hearing. His team has apparently "asked if there was a back door way to get to the grand jury room, away from reporters, cameras and the public."
In case you had forgotten, Rick Perry is currently under investigation for potential bribery, coercion, and abuse of office. At issue is his attempt to force Travis County District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg to resign after her DUI last year.
In an ironic twist, it turns out that the only non-public entrance to the grand jury room is through Rosemary Lehmberg's office. That means that if Perry wants to hide from the media when he goes into the courtroom, he'll have to go through the office of the very person he's accused of threatening.
Tough break, but that's the price you have to pay when you want to hide your bribery investigation from the media to preserve your chances at another presidential run.
Get a refresher on Rick Perry's criminal charges and why he wants to hide them after the jump.
Thanks to taxpayers who solely reside in Travis County, the one unit in Texas that has jurisdiction to prosecute political corruption (and other types of fraud) will still stand. The Travis County Commissioners Court agreed to fund the unit, though not the full budget. The Austin Chroniclereports:
Travis County Commissioners this afternoon voted 4-1 to have the county's budget office come up with roughly $1.8 million to help to fund the Travis County District Attorney's Public Integrity Unit, which this summer was stripped of state funding for the coming year by Gov. Rick Perry.
The county funds would be added to more than $734,000 in funds D.A. Rosemary Lehmberg said her office would pull from its Forfeited Property Account to pay for the prosecution of white collar fraud and public corruption cases handled by a PIU that will operate with fewer employees in fiscal year 2014.
In the wake of Lehmberg's April drunk driving arrest and conviction, for which she was sentenced to 45 days in jail (she served 20), Perry vowed to veto $3.7 million per year in biennial funding for the PIU, which has statewide jurisdiction in certain kinds of fraud and corruption cases, unless Lehmberg resigned her post. She declined and he went through with his threat, slashing a source of funding that had been allotted to the PIU since 1982. Prior to that, the D.A.'s PIU operations were funded solely by the county.
Continue reading as we discuss further implications of Travis County's funding.
Rick Perry made true on his threat to veto funding for the Public Integritiy Unit if Rosemary Lehmberg did not resign from her office. She, as one would hope from their public officials, refused to be coerced. But now the state's funding for the state's one Public Integrity Unit has disappeared.
So. There goes our ethics. Perry also veteod individual ethics bills from this legislative session. When it comes to ethical government, he just doesn't care.
Thankfully, not quite all is lost. Despite no funding for the next budget for the $3.5 Million unit, Travis County prosecutors might still have their jobs and the local DA's office might still keep our politicians honest.
Rick Perry can't stop messing with Texas, and with Travis County.
Yesterday, Rick Perry threatened to line-item veto funding for the Public Integrity Unit, which has statewide prosecutorial authority over fraud and corruption, if District Attorney Rosemary Lehmberg does not resign.
The PIU is expected to receive $7.5 million from the state over the biennium to support its ongoing prosecutions in more than 400 cases, ranging from insurance fraud to public corruption investigations, according to Assistant Travis County District Attorney Gregg Cox, who runs the unit.
I've previously argued that Lehmberg needs to stay to prevent Perry from getting his dirty hands on the PIU, among many other reasons. Now, it appears that Perry's motives may be even more self-serving.
As Progress Texas noted yesterday, Perry may be trying to shut down the PIU to stop the investigation of CPRIT and his alleged efforts to divert state cancer research funds to his donors and cronies.
Now, it turns out Perry's mere threat to veto funding if Lehmberg does not resign may be a violation of the Texas Penal Code.
Yesterday was a very dramatic day in the Texas House.
Looming with the deadline that any non-local House Bills must be passed out of the full House by tomorrow night, tensions can run high, and that came to boiling point yesterday.
With the passage of HB 500, a bill that was debated for several hours yesterday, the stage was set for drama. HB 500 cuts taxes for businesses to the tune of almost $666 million dollars. There was vigourous debate on the bill and on the priorities of using these extra monies for tax breaks. Sylvester Turner, proving to be a budget hawk, like most Democrats this session was most notably against the spending, as his displaying of an abacus made clear.
But one of the most tense and contentious moments, forcing R's to battle with one another was what came next, an amendment to HB 3153, a fairly non-contentious bill without the proposed amendment.
The amendment, authored by Representative Phil King, would have transferred funding from the Public Integrity Unity to the Attorney General's Office, unless the current District Attorney, Rosemary Lehmberg resigns. Lehmberg was convicted of a DUI last month and is currently serving her sentence in the Travis County Jail.
The Public Integrity Unit is a unique entity because it is funded by the state, but it is meant to investigate and prosecute officeholders in the state. It is housed and run under the umbrella of the Travis County District Attorney's Office. If Lehmberg resigns, Rick Perry would have the power to appoint someone as the Travis County DA until her term expires.
The amendment had a point of order overruled on it for germaneness, and caused several prominent members to speak against it, noting that it is bad public policy, and bad politics for a myriad of reasons. Democrat Sylvester Turner and Republican Charlie Geren both spoke against the amendment.
Rosemary Lehmberg's drunk driving episode has clearly captivated the local news media as they roll in the increased readership that comes with a high profile local story that has statewide ramifications. You can see it in the almost breathless coverage of the latest video, or recording inside or outside, or report filed, or motion granted, or quirky update, or what brand of sweater our District Attorney was wearing that fateful night. Of course, the public will consume as much of that as is supplied because this has all the elements of the classic story rolled into one big package.
But what happens when the media frenzy runs out or moves on? We already know Lehmberg is guilty and there aren't a whole lot of details left to the imagination. How much of it is political, from both the right and the left? Do people care that the person who filed the petition to discharge Lehmberg from office was a Republican or that Republican Governor Rick Perry would appoint any replacement prior to the next election?
There are a lot of opinions and likely even a few agendas all at play here so let's cut through the noise and look at the very simple reality of what Katherine wrote yesterday and why it matters a great deal.
Rosemary Lehmberg's troubles continue. Or maybe not. In a case whose importance cannot be gainsaid, Judge Lora Livingston yesterday granted the application for issuance of citation in the petition to remove the beleaguered Travis County District Attorney from office.
The course of this case is far from clear, however.
In the debate about whether or not Rosemary Lehmberg should resign, what's really at stake is whether the entire state of Texas can afford to let Rick Perry control the office of Travis County DA. Given Perry's history and the unique faculties of the office, the answer is clear: Lehmberg needs to stay.
This goes beyond mere partisan politics and gets at the nature of good government itself, which is admittedly a hard argument to make when videos of the embattled elected official in a spit restraint are circulating on the Internet. Those calling on Lehmberg to resign need to recognize the severity of handing the Public Integrity Unit and the environmental prosecution division over to a Perry crony whose attitude on everything from pre-trial release to the death penalty is likely to be out of touch with Austin's progressive community values.
But this issue is not just about a progressive orientation towards criminal justice. This debate is fundamentally about what the Travis County DA's office does, by virtue of being located in our state's capital city, and whether Rick Perry should have control over those faculties of the office. It's about good government, and that's something Rick Perry can't be expected to provide.
Bottom line: this debate is about the capacities of the office of Travis County DA, not about the major mistakes made by the elected official currently in that office. Anyone arguing for Lehmberg to step down needs to explain why the Public Integrity Unit and statewide environmental prosecutions are in better hands with Rick Perry than the current staff of the DA's office.
Lehmberg was taken into custody this morning.
Photo credit: Austin-American Statesman
This morning, Travis County DA Rosemary Lehmberg pleaded guilty to drunk driving. She was sentenced to 45 days in jail and taken into custody immediately. She was also given the maximum $4,000 fine and her license was revoked for 180 days.
On Wednesday, Austin attorney Kerry O'Brien filed suit to remove Travis County DA Rosemary Lehmberg from office after her DWI arrest last week. "Lehmberg violated the public trust, demeaned her office and created a substantial risk of injury to others," O'Brien said.
Today, Lehmberg's lawyer David Sheppard defended Lehmberg in a statement that emphasized Lehmberg's admittance to her "terrible mistake" and the fact that she will serve the longest sentence ever handed out, of 45 days. "Rosemary is a woman of her word, she's served this county for 35 years as a valuable public servant, she runs probably the best district attorney's office in the state of Texas if not the nation. This is a terrible mistake on her part but it really should not override the fact that she has accepted responsibility today," Sheppard writes.
He also revealed that tapes of Lehmberg's initial arrest would be released in the coming days and that "[t]here have been some very serious misstatements and inaccuracies said both in the news media and in a lawsuit about Ms. Lehmberg spitting and kicking at officers. I can categorically tell you that did not happen."
The Travis County DA's office said that senior staff will take over operations, "the same as when the officeholder is away from the office."
The Statesman captured video of Lehmberg's sentencing:
Read Attorney David Sheppard's statement below the jump.