Home

About
- About Us
- Community Guidelines

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR

Advertisements

Rick Perry Wants It Both Ways on Stimulus Package; Hides Truth of Unemployment Fund


by: Phillip Martin

Tue Feb 17, 2009 at 08:27 PM CST


Ed. Note: Post updated at 11:53am.

Key Point: a year ago, the state's unemployment fund had a surplus of $90 million. Governor Rick Perry stopped collecting the replenishment tax, and now 12 months later, our $90 million surplus is a $447 million deficit.

We've documented Perry's outspoken opposition to the stimulus package. However, as I wrote about this morning, Perry started hedging his bets over the weekend -- trying to cover his tracks by having the Texas HHSC and Education Commissioners talk about the stimulus funds and how they planned to use them to address issues that the state's budget leaders -- Governor Rick Perry, Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst, and Speaker Joe Straus -- are too weak to deal with.

Well, today, Perry tried to walk back his remarks. From the Statesman:

Gov. Rick Perry said today he will gladly accept federal stimulus dollars for one-time expenses, but he’s not anxious to embrace dollars for recurring state expenses.

“We need the freedom to pick and choose,” Perry told a group of small-business leaders in Austin. “We need the freedom to say, ‘no thanks’ if they’re trying to stick a bill on the people of the State of Texas just to expand government.”

Governor Rick Perry is trying to have his cake and eat it, too. He's spent the last three weeks railing against the bailouts, but even he recognizes that to do so is wrong. However, it's not wrong because Texas deserves its money, or because its good public policy to maximize the use of state funds. No -- Perry has only flip-flopped on his position on the bailout because it is politically necessary to do so. According to Texas Workforce Commissioner Tom Pauken -- from Quorum Report (subscription required):

He said the federal government was putting the states in an impossible position: turn down the money and stand accused of insensitivity to laid-off workers or put employers in an untenable position once the stimulus money is spent.

Governor Perry, realizing that Texas voters would see his politics for what they are and call a spade is spade, has real worry to be viewed as being insensitive to workers. He is. He always has been. The news appeared last week in the Monday Memo to the House Democratic Caucus just how badly Governor Perry screwed up the unemployment funds in Texas:

Rick Perry and the Unemployment Fund

Upon hearing the news that the Comptroller was predicting a $9.1 billion drop in revenue, Governor Perry's reaction was to increase the shortfall by calling for more tax cuts.  This is right in line with what he has done with the State's Unemployment Compensation Trust Fund.

A year ago, the Unemployment Fund had a surplus of $90 million.  In a shortsighted and politically expedient move, Governor Perry halted collection of the replenishment tax.  Nearly 12 months later, Governor Perry reinstated the replenishment tax.  Now the Unemployment Fund faces a $447 million deficit.

Hiding behind failed leadership and misinformed policies, Texas' struggling economy is entirely a product of Perry's failed leadership.

Even his current position -- take one-time federal funds but opt out of funds that would have "strings" attached -- is purely a way to protect profits for his large business buddies. Those "strings" Governor Perry is upposed to includes allowing unemployed workers to receive their compensation benefits.

Governor Rick Perry is all over the map on the stimulus package -- and now he's taken to whining about the politics of it all. Perry should make up his mind -- either play politics with the stimulus package, or focus on the policy. But he can't complain just about the politics he doesn't like -- at least not with Texas voters recognizing his positions for the hypocritical lump of lies that they are.

ADVERTISEMENT


Copyright Burnt Orange Report, all rights reserved.
Do not republish without express written permission.


Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

The whole picture, less BS (5.00 / 1)
I appreciate the recognition in your last article Phil, and since I fell asleep before I could answer you yesterday I'll try to address your concerns here...Is Perry opposed to 269,000 jobs...no (he's created more jobs than that in his tenure in office)...is he opposed to the largest tax cut in our nations history...I'm sure that would depends on what we'd have to give up in order to satisfy the tax cut stipulations.

Occasionally, Phil, you show yourself to be a capable thinker so you should know quite well that nothing in this world is free. Having said that, and living in a world built on balances and the concept of give and take, just what do you think must be sacrificed for either or both of these propositions to come true? In my mind the biggest concern is our freedom to continue running the state ourselves.

The fed government WILL take whatever it can get with the carrot and stick approach by exchanging the carrot with money hanging on the end of the stick. And once you're in you're all in because just like a crack dealer and a crack head, once you're dependent on Fed money it's hard to go back. California ringing any bells? Besides that, leading into the recession Texas was creating more jobs a year then anyone and our economy was excellent. We're still not in as much danger as many of our neighboring states. You may not like it but Perry has had a lot to do with that (I'm sure you'll argue right about here). But I can only look to the statistics and see how well the state had progressed under tort reform and new economic development policies that brought such jobs as Caterpillar into the state DESPITE the recession. Now that's impressive.


Agree! (0.00 / 0)
Unfortunately Perry is being criticized for not wanting to take the $$, however if he does not Texans will still have to pay for the bill in increased taxes.  That would be compounding the hurt on Texans who's government policies have weathered the recession better than most states like California, etc. who's increased social programs have killed state budgets.  "Also too" what ever happened to, "no unfunded mandates" under President Obama.  Accepting the stimulus money creates many new long term liabilities which will be unfunded in the near future.

[ Parent ]
Day to day budgeting (0.00 / 0)
Perry's idea of conservative government worked when we had the fun of a budget surplus, but now the revenues are gone and we are returning to deficit. Essentially it is living paycheck to paycheck, with no foresight.

This type of budgeting is called "fiscally irresponsible" when you and I do it in our personal finances. So why is it not, when the government does it?


Connect With BOR
    

2014 Texas Elections
Follow BOR for who's in, who's out, and who's up.

Candidate Tracker:
-- Statewide Races
-- Congressional Races
-- State Senate Races
-- State Rep. Races
-- SBOE Races
-- Austin City Council

Click here for all 2014 Elections coverage

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Texas Blue Pages

Texas Blue Pages
A career network for progressives.

Advertisement

Shared On Facebook

Burnt Orange Reporters
Editor and Publisher:
Katherine Haenschen

Senior Staff Writers:
Genevieve Cato
Joe Deshotel
Michael Hurta
Ben Sherman

Staff Writers:
Omar Araiza
Emily Cadik
Phillip Martin
Natalie San Luis
Katie Singh
Joseph Vogas

Founder:
Byron LaMasters

Blogger Emeritus:
Karl-Thomas Musselman

Read staff bios here.

Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox