Voter Suppression Wiki

You want to talk voter suppression? (0.00 / 0)

Then start by addressing:

1) the blatant, extensive caucus FRAUD across the nation perpetrated by Obama and his campaign;
2) the vote-stealing that took place May 30 at the RBC meeting;
3) the utter hijacking of the democratic process at the Democratic National Convention during the roll call vote.

Wikipedia doesn't have enough bandwidth for all the fraudulent activities undertaken by the DONC.

---

by: pantherpwr @ Fri Sep 19, 2008 at 16:36:42 PM CDT

whatever (0.00 / 0)

Now, a very great man once said that some people rob you with a fountain pen.

---

by: Phillip Martin @ Sat Sep 20, 2008 at 11:56:13 AM CDT

[ Parent ]

I think we're past that (0.00 / 0)

I believe we all (well most) have moved past any issues we might have had with the process.  It wasn't perfect but I can give examples from both campaigns about the problems. Yes, Hillary's campaign was no set of angels either so move past accusations of particular campaigns.

Now if you have a problem with the caucus process start by working with the committee established to address the issues. Don't gripe about it without putting some legwork behind the gripes. That is unless you feel like using BOR as a theraputic channel for venting your frustrations.

BTW, no one hijacked the process at the DNC. They were just getting past the formalities and keeping the program moving. When Arkansas voted unanimously for Obama (remember, Hillary won that state by the largest margin of any in the nation) it became apparent the majority of the delegates at the convention had reached a decision the rest of us needed to reach.

---

by: RBearSAT @ Sat Sep 20, 2008 at 12:31:38 PM CDT

[ Parent ]

Translation (0.00 / 0)

I could summarize the two replies to my post in one sentence, well-known to all women who dare dissent:

"Fall in line, sweetie."

And I can answer you both with two words:

"HELL, NO!"

And you better believe I will answer you at the voting booth in November, along with around 6 million others.

---

by: pantherpwr @ Sat Sep 20, 2008 at 14:39:56 PM CDT

[ Parent ]

Answer in what way (0.00 / 0)

I guess you imply that you will be voting for McCain-Palin in November by your response. If that's the case I'm trying to understand your logic.

If my assumption is correct you are going to base your decision for the course of the next four years not on policy, but on perceived candidate selection issues. Did I get that right?

If my assumption is correct your logic for voting has nothing to do with issues.

That is if my assumption is correct that you are not voting for Obama-Biden.

---

by: RBearSAT @ Sun Sep 21, 2008 at 14:09:31 PM CDT

[ Parent ]