Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond
Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Follow Burnt Orange Report on Twitter (@BOR) and Facebook.

TX Primary Results Thread


by: Phillip Martin

Tue Mar 04, 2008 at 06:45 PM CST


SCROLL DOWN ON OUR FRONT PAGE TO SEE LIVE TX RESULTS

TX Presidential Delegate Breakdown by Senate District - Brought to you by BOR
Buckeye State Blog - For all the best reporting on Ohio
Daily Kos - For the best national reporting
TexBlog Pac - Like what you read tonight? Donate some change and help us turn TX blue!

2:00am (Phillip) -  I'm out until morning. I have 6 hours of class tomorrow, starting in, oh, five hours. Hooray!

I updated the Presidential numbers one last time. And do remember to follow the Senate District delegate numbers, as they tell you the best story of what's going on: TX Presidential Delegate Breakdown by Senate District

Tomorrow we'll look at how each Presidential campaign fared, a clearer look at Texas House primary races, determine how large "undervotes" were in some key TX races, and prepare for another day of TX politics. But so far, there's one last number to share with you all:

WELL OVER TWO MILLION DEMOCRATS VOTED IN THE PRIMARY. JOHN CORNYN, START THE CLOCK -- YOUR TIME IN THE U.S. SENATE IS ALMOST UP.

1:39pm (Phillip) - It has been brought to my attention that BOR has not called the popular vote for Clinton. I didn't know that needed to happen, since MSNBC and CNN did. But let's make it official:

Senator Clinton to win Popular Vote in Texas

Now, as I've said previously, I'm not sure if you can count the popular vote as a win. She's still up by only a single delegate in the primary, and trailing in the caucuses. Her TX Superdelegate lead has dwindled to a narrow 11 to 9 margin -- she hasn't "won" a Superdelegate for weeks now, while Obama has picked up over half of his Superdelegates in that time frame.

I think Clinton can hang her hat on Ohio -- and she should. She did a great job campaigning there, and the contrasts she brought out in the race are instructive to her as she foes forward. As I wrote earlier tonight, she gave a great speech.

But I don't think she "won" Texas. A month ago she was supposed to dominate in TX. Three weeks ago, she was a lock down here. Two weeks ago, she needed to win TX and OH to stay alive. Last week, TX didn't even matter if she won. Now she's won the popular vote -- impressive, sure, but non-instructive for selecting a Presidential candidate from TX -- and it's a "win." I'm not buying it. Again, as I wrote before

Senator Obama could come close to Senator Clinton in the "primary" portion and dominate the "caucus" portion --- the only catch is that those 67 votes that come from the "caucus" system won't be known until June and the Texas Democratic Party Convention.

If the expectations are that Senator Clinton will win and perhaps even dominate in Texas, then even Senator Obama finishing close on Election Day -- with an understanding that he will do well in the future caucuses -- could be enough to count as a win for Senator Obama.

ADVERTISEMENT

 

1:35am (Phillip) - It's 2:25am here. I'm going on 6+ hours straight. I may be signing off soon...

1:10am (Phillip) - Someone asked if I'm just pulling numbers out of my, well, butt. I've been telling you all this all night long: look at the Senate District breakdown chart to see what areas are still out there:

TX Presidential Delegate Breakdown by Senate District

1:07am (Phillip) - Some movement towards Obama -- he just picked up a couple delegate seats by splitting a South TX district and tying an East TX district. The numbers aren't done coming in, folks -- and I'm not done writing about them.

My question about Clinton's alleged momentum now -- if the New York Knicks lose 11 straight games, then have a good week, has a lot really changed? Aren't they still the New York Knicks?

12:52am (Phillip)Ohio statewide results. Her lead has dropped to 12% points in Ohio. It looks like Yanez is pulling away, ever so slightly, from Criss in the TX Supreme Court Justice, Place 8 race. BOR reader Eric Roberson is winning going into a run-off in TX-32. Rick Noriega is still barely above 50% in the Tex-Sen race -- let's hope he holds on. I don't have final numbers for Reps. Olvio, Moreno, Escobar, Haggerty, or Macias yet --- though it looks like Haggerty will lose, Macias may win, and the three Dems (Olivo, Escobar, Moreno) could go down.

The down-ballot races have been crazy in many cases. Mark Thompson -- a relative unknown in the Railroad Commissioner race -- is sitting at 48% and heading for a runoff. Gene Kelly is doing his normal torture dance. I'm not as willing to say that Larry Joe Doherty beat Dan Grant b/c of voter ineptitude -- I need to see more numbers, but I've always thought Austin-based folks were counting too much for Grant. The only Craddick D to go down, Rep. Kevin Bailey, went down to a largely succesful ground game run by the Armando Walle campaign -- a candidate whose expertise is so welcomed that I almost forgot that Al "don't shake that booty" Edwards is going to be an elected official again (gag).

Lots more analysis, but some of that will be for tomorrow. I've tried my best to stay neutral on the numbers tonight. I'm still not as convinced that Senator Clinton has momentum -- as David Gergen said on CNN (why doesn't he talk more -- and yes, I'm biased to professors from my school) -- she probably just stopped his some. We'll see what happens tomorrow.

12:45am (Phillip) - Just went through all the numbers around the state. Still a few House races that are too close to call, that could be telling in the Speaker's race.

CNN reported earlier today that they expected that 60% of votes would be early, and 40% would be electon day. So...if 25% of precints are still to be reported, that means that we're still waiting on (.25)(.4)=(.1) -- 10% of precincts to vote. And, presumably, most of these precincts are going to break large for Obama. Problem is, he's now down 104,000 total votes, and to make up that margin, he'd need about 2:1 break on 300,000 votes that were still out there. Don't see that happening. But I do bet that, by morning, he's cut that 104,000 lead significantly (Clinton's lead is decreasing in Ohio as I type). As has been true for this entire primary season -- timing is everything.

12:20am (Phillip) - Caucuses are coming in now. Obama leading (no surprise). Nothing new in the TX races, otherwise.

11:56pm (Phillip) -  Why I'm hesitant about the numbers: (1) Harris County had a precinct that was still voting a half hour ago. There were several thousand voters in one spot. There were also some precincts in Harris County where, possibly, no votes were counted -- the disk was lost or damanged, which means 10,000+ votes haven't been counted. (These are all from my friend who is watching TV in Houston and telling me what's going on).

I'd also like to remind everyone what I wrote several weeks ago, in my "How Barack Obama Can Win in Texas" post:

Senator Obama could come close to Senator Clinton in the "primary" portion and dominate the "caucus" portion --- the only catch is that those 67 votes that come from the "caucus" system won't be known until June and the Texas Democratic Party Convention.

If the expectations are that Senator Clinton will win and perhaps even dominate in Texas, then even Senator Obama finishing close on Election Day -- with an understanding that he will do well in the future caucuses -- could be enough to count as a win for Senator Obama.

So what's happened tonight? I'm still not convinced TX is over, but if it is, it's still really, really close (they're going to be counting for 3 more hours out there, folks).  Either way, he has gone from (1) Clinton dominating TX to (2) Obama almost (and maybe still) splitting/winning the popular vote, and he's still winning the caucus system.

The only thing that's changed, then, is how we've defined a "win" in Texas.

11:52pm (Phillip) -  CNN, too. I haven't looked at county numbers for about an hour. Let me go take a look, I'll be back in about 10 minutes.

11:50pm (Phillip) - MSNBC has called the race for Texas. Umm..OK.. 

11:20pm (Phillip) - Big update. Pay attention: 

  • Obama/Clinton still neck and neck.
  • It looks like we may lose House Dems Escobar and Moreno to challengers in their primaries that were backed by conservative consultants. Would these candidates promise not tu support Craddick?
  • Armando Walle is a new State Rep. -- defeating Rep. Kevin Bailey. One Craddick D lost, though it looks like all the others will hang on, unless the final boxes in South Texas prove very unkind for Reps. Flores and Pena.
  • Rep. Dora Olivo is neck and neck with challenger Ron Reynolds. Olivo, who has never voted for Craddick, took some Craddick money in the final days. Interesting to see what shakes out from this race.
  • Yanez/Criss is still neck and neck.
  • Mark Thompson is definitely heading into a runoff for RR Commissioner, possibly against Dale Henry (according to current numbers).
  • Republican Craddick supporter Nathan Macias is hanging on by the skin of his teeth in his TX House race.
  • Larry Joe Doherty is going to win TX-10, barring some incredible final boxes
  • Dracula Gibbs is leading going into the runoff in the Republican primary, TX-22.

11:00pm (Phillip) -  "Epic political contest." I wonder if the CNN anchors think that the numbers going up for each candidate are like punches. All it is is reporting. All it is is patience. Basically, we're having to wait and watch the paint dry. I'm going to make a sandwich.

If you aren't already, visit this link to be smarter than everyone on TV not named John King: TX Presidential Delegate Breakdown by Senate District

10:50pm (Phillip) - So what happens when Obama wins TX? Does the media forget that if he won TX, the race was going to be over?

10:40pm (Phillip) -  Clinton just gave an incredible speech. Made her case very, very well. Obama is beginning...

10:21pm (Phillip) - Clinton speaking in Ohio. She came out with about 20 terrific lines. Supporters chanting "yes we will." Impressive. Makes an incredible case for her candiacy to stay alive. Moving goalposts, moving the media. If you can't meet your own expectations, change them. Well done in Ohio. Let's stay up and see what happens in TX.

 

10:20pm (Phillip) - Just updated all the numbers, so scroll down below. Right now, Noriega still hovering around 50%. Larry Joe Doherty looks like he may win handily over Dan Grant. Borris Miles got trounced by Al Edwards. Yanez/Criss is still a coin flip. Two great Dems -- Escobar and Moreno -- may get beat by Craddick candidates, but two Craddick D's, Pena and Flores, are still neck and neck. Craddick Republican Nathan Macias is losing, but Craddick Republican Dee Margo is winning.

10:02pm (Phillip) - I'm amazed that there are announcers calling this night for Clinton already -- just as I'm amazed those were calling the night for Obama earlier. P-A-T-I-E-N-C-E.

9:56pm (Phillip) -  CNN calls Ohio for Clinton. Interesting -- based on what Buckeye State Blog (the BOR of Ohio) said this 20 minutes ago:

blah blah blah...Clinton's up 140k in Ohio. Yea. I get it.

But we've got 0% in Hamilton County, 0% in Montgomery County, next to nothing in Toledo, and - of course - o% in Cuyahoga County. So hold your horses before you start calling this either way.

And looks like Cuyahoga County won't be reporting till about 4:30am. I know - great news.

9:53pm (Phillip) - John King. God bless him. Thank you for actually looking at who is voting.

9:45pm (Phillip) -  CNN is a bunch of idiots. They're like kids looking at stars and saying, "wow, those are stars - I wonder where the light switch is to turn them on." They fundamentally don't understand Texas. The fact is, we're finally getting boxes coming in -- and they are coming in randomly. And whichever blowhard just called this a disgrace can take a cattle prod up his rear end.

Basically, CNN can't handle waiting. If you wait -- and yes, it will be serveral more hours -- you'll see what's going on. Senator Clinton's boxes are coming in in South Texas, and Obama is still neck and neck. Wait until the urban areas start reporting...

Meanwhile, I just updated all the posts -- so scroll down the page (if you can). Look at those for the latest numbers.

9:10pm (Phillip) - Yes. Server crashed. We're on it -- doing the best we can. I may be a little slow updating the official posts as we let it breathe some new life and try some things, so here's the latest:

  • Some South TX boxes just came in, which is why we just saw Clinton's numbers jump up.
  • Nothing new in TX House races, really.
  • In statewide races, Noriega is still flirting with the 50%, Larry Joe Doherty is beating Dan Grant, Shelly Sekula-Gibbs is winning the cluster-race in TX-22.

8:49pm (Phillip) - Sorry we are running a little slow. HUGE traffic, plus I'm updating about 8 threads at a time. Try to refresh every 15 minutes or so -- that's about how often the new numbers are all updated. But please, keep reading. And donate to TexBlog Pac while you wait!

8:46pm (Phillip) -  If HRC loses Texas, it's over.

8:45pm (Phillip) -  Forgot to mention the Travis County DA race -- Lehmberg (Ronnie Earle endorsed) has 39% at early vote. Montford -- who came under criticism for taking a lot of lobbyist money -- is in second at 29%. Look for a runoff between those two

In statewide races, Mark Thompson is close to winning the RR Commissioner race outright -- over Art Hall and Dale Henry. Yanez/Criss is still a toss-up. No big news in State House races (about to make another run through the numbers -- since more are coming in, I may start only updating this post ince every 15 minutes or so. Talk in the comments!) 

8:30pm (Phillip) - If you're not already, you can track TX House races here. Literally hundreds upon hundreds of Texans are caucusing tonight. What a beautiful thing. Meanwhile, here in Travis County, Glen Maxey has a strong mountain to climb to overcome the early vote total, while Rep. Dukes does, in fact, look safe

8:21pm (Phillip) - Phil King has a huge early vote total -- he's likely to pull it off. Pena and Flores still neck and neck. Noriega is hovering around 49% -- avoiding a runoff would be terrific. Yanez and Criss are very close. (As the more and more that it looks like Obama is going to win, the more I'm going to focus on TX races -- but the numbers will still be updated). 

8:11pm (Phillip) - Obama built too large an early vote lead. HRC isn't looking good in suburban white counties where she was expected to "balance" out, and Obama is winning urban areas by 60%. In State races, two Craddick D's -- Flores and Pena -- are neck and neck in South Texas.

8:04pm (Phillip) - Check that Travis County stuff. Some precints are still voting in Austin. Could take a while (as I said earlier). Oh, and McCain is the nominee. Click that "McCain playlist" ad on the right and see how non-maveric, uber-conservative he actually is.

 

7:51pm (Phillip) -  The Travis County website has State Rep. Dukes (Austin) winning early vote by 2/3. Looks like she's safe.

7:21pm (Phillip) - (Reminder) CNN keeps saying "we don't know where these numbers are." WE DO. TX Presidential Delegate Breakdown by Senate District. As a note -- those numbers are based on current totals, so they'll be flexible all night long.

7:50pm (Phillip) -  Most of the precints in, so far, aren't in the major urban areas. There are some State House races with small turnout numbers, but none in the major metro areas. I'm not immediately re-posting every new number (I'm trying to watch about 50 races tonight), but when there's a significant jump in numbers, you'll know. Keep scrolling down for my updates...

7:44pm (Phillip) -  In statewide news, Susan Criss and Linda Yanez are neck and neck. Sam Houston is doing well. And longtime BOR reader Eric Roberson is winning his race early in CD-32.

7:40pm (Phillip) -  I have no idea where CNN is getting their numbers. They aren't the Secretary of State numbers, that's for sure, so I'm not going to worry about it too much. And BTW, for all those NOT interested in the presidential race, no TX House races have any real numbers yet. Probably in about 20-30 minutes...

7:31pm (Phillip) -  One precinct in Houston where my best friend votes had 11 people at the precinct last year. Well over 500 now. Wow.

7:13pm (Phillip) - I'll update most pages 5-10 minutes or so. Just an FYI.

7:06pm (Phillip) - Numbers start coming in. Be sure to scroll down the page -- "leaders" are highlighted in orange. (You're impressed, right? Have I told you how much Adam rocks?!)

7:02pm (Phillip) - CNN just did an analysis where Clinton wins each state tonight 55-45, and each state going forward 60-40, and she is still just marginally ahead in the delegate county. They did the same thing with Obama, and he gets within a handful of delegates of being the nominee -- a gap that would close with the Superdelegates. Just thought I'd share. Kos says that if they focus on math, then Clinton's "momentum" won't work. Live media watching...

6:57pm (Phillip) - Reports of vote stealing in Third Ward in Houston.

6:47pm (Matt)Expect long delays on reporting early vote numbers. Reports on the ground in Travis County is that there are still long lines in many precincts in the major urban areas -- around the stage. (Matt says) that early vote numbers can't be released while people are still in line. So don't expect early vote totals immediately at the 7:00pm hour...could be a while for those early numbers.

6:46pm (Phillip) - Obama wins Vermont. The delegate spread in VT may give Obama enough of a spread to offset losses elsewhere, according to some analysists.

6:42pm (Phillip) - Here's how tonight will work. All the results are updated as often as possible in the threads below. This post (which will be updated throughout the night) will have the latest news (when precincts close, reports from the ground, campaigns that are conceding, etc.). When a new item comes in, this will get bumped with the new update. I'll probably keep the 5-7 latest "news stories" above the fold, with the rest of the results below the fold. See the above example. 

6:41pm (Phillip) - Some of these updates will be from Matt, KT, and others calling and/or e-mailing me. So when you see their name next to the update, that means its their reporting.

6:35pm (Phillip) - If any of our numbers in the results thread look screwy, let us know.

6:25pm (Phillip) - I am excited about the primary -- but I'll be relieved when this is over. I'm already getting a writer's cramp, and I've barely begun the night. Somebody make sure that "blogger's writers cramp" is covered under whosever universal health care plan we pass.

6:22pm (Phillip) - And we're off!

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Impressed (5.00 / 1)
Y'all running a damn good site here.  How can I donate to your cause?

Good question (0.00 / 0)
TexBlog PAC

We're trying to turn our state blue, and we need to do that at the local level first. Our blog has joined with some others to do so -- donate there!

Now, a very great man once said that some people rob you with a fountain pen.


[ Parent ]
CNN (0.00 / 0)
has almost 500 K votes and a 60-40 split for Obama.

where are their #'s coming from when the SOS has only 50,000?


[ Parent ]
Yeah, no idea (0.00 / 0)
I'm reporting from the Secretary of State's site -- that seems like the only logical thing to do.

But remember -- we break ours down by Senate District, in which, it's still more useful to watch us. :)

Now, a very great man once said that some people rob you with a fountain pen.


[ Parent ]
SoS (0.00 / 0)
The SoS site would appear to be having some challenges as they are currently showing more early votes than total votes.  They're clearly still working the cobwebs out.

CNN may have early Presidential numbers but they won't be showing any down-ballot races.

adam


[ Parent ]
Hillary's vote is pushing Noriega out of the need for a runoff (0.00 / 0)
as she shrinks Obama's margin, he's gone over 50%

[ Parent ]
Austin is a zoo (0.00 / 0)
My girlfriend is caucusing in Austin (Barton Hills) and she texted me at 7:37 saying they'd overflowed from the original caucus area (school cafeteria) into the gym

Then she texted me at 7:46 saying that they've now overflowed into the library and had to clear out the republicans to make room.

Oh, and there are still people in line to vote in the primary.


Hey don't call my caucus a zoo (5.00 / 1)
I helped deliver that caucus for Obama.  We won that caucus 67%.  Allocated 69 delegates to Obama and 34 for Clinton.  Our caucus went well past 11:00 p.m.  We had over 728 people sign in a preference in our caucus. 4 provisional ballots 2 for each candidate.  Did not impact the percentage break or delegate count.

PCT 342 gets the largest allocation of delegates in Travis because we are the largest and most loyal Democratic voters in Travis.  We voted overwhelming for change.

It was crazy, but it all went well.  Everything went as best as can be expected.

I was elected as the permanent pct convention secretary and will head the Obama SD convention caucus for PCT342.

PCT 342 rocks!


[ Parent ]
Not a Zoo but My Caucus Certainly had Big Problems (0.00 / 0)
At my caucus (Pct 80 in Brazos county)there were five people signing in caucus goers. Problem is that they didn't use consistent methods to confirm that they voted in the democratic primary.

One person would take an electronic voting machine receipt and an unmarked voter registration card as proof they had
voted.

One person didn't know what EV stood for on the voter
role and marked lots of people as provisional.

One person only paid attention to the voter role and
not the voter reg card to determine if they voted in
the primary.

By the time I was able to get to the sign in table
about 70 people had already signed in under these
various scenarios (at least 15% had been marked provisional) and when I brought it to the temp
prec chair's attention he essentially threw up his
hands and said to the sign in table to just check if the caucus goer was registered in the precinct without consideration to proof of if they voted in the dem primary.

I have already spoken to Hillary's legal team and the
TX Dem Party about this and have advised them that ALL
votes from my precinct in the caucus must be
considered provisional and checked against the
official voting records before delegates are finalized.

OK, with this in mind, do you think Hillary had a
reason to reserve the right to sue? Was it to suppress
the vote and delay the caucus results? Or was it to
make damn sure the results are correct?

BTW, one of my volunteers personally heard 4 Obama
supporters say in the elevator that they hadn't been
able to vote in the primary but they wanted to be sure
and caucus for Obama. Think these were the only 4 out
of 213 caucus goers? And the person who signed his
presidential preference as "Hucklebee", I'm guessing
he wasn't a democratic primary voter. Just a guess.


[ Parent ]
How about Travis DA? (0.00 / 0)
I can't be jumping all over the place. SO Appreciate BOR. You rock, Phillip. A testament to your fine parents. So glad you can cast a ballot (as difficult as it was for you) with your father in good health this time around.

runoff (0.00 / 0)
it should be a runoff between Montford and  Lehmberg. Lehmberg leading by 10 points -- she has 39% right now.

Now, a very great man once said that some people rob you with a fountain pen.

[ Parent ]
we running any quicker now (5.00 / 1)
did some server tweaks, and got rid of the recent/rec diary area for now until things calm down.

SoapBlox - building online communities

Some (0.00 / 0)
It's only taking about 10-15 seconds to load the page. But it's loading. :)

Now, a very great man once said that some people rob you with a fountain pen.

[ Parent ]
Round Rock report (0.00 / 0)
My wife early voted here in Round Rock and I voted at 6 PM.  My precinct (463) isn't that big but ever'body and their neighbor was out in force to vote in the Democratic primary, AND to caucus tonight.

She spent 2 hours in line and she noted a lot of Obama support ; I chatted up Obama folks working the primary to remind voters to return to caucus.  I was at home to tuck in the kids, so my wife could go.

The last primary we voted in, it was about 10 Dem voters total  ... I think 2006 when we went to vote for Chris Bell?  Meanwhile the Republicans had folks in all day that time.

This time, it was a line out of the door and no wait on the Republican side.  And we're in Williamson County, though just barely.

Can you believe 3.5+ million for our primary?  WOW.


Delegates (0.00 / 0)
Despite Barack losing the vote count (for now) he's currently netting 14 delegates.  Just thought it should be pointed out.

SOS has delegate split 63-63 (0.00 / 0)
which of course totals the 126 awarded out of Primary results.
Each Pres candidate over a million raw votes, over 2 million total Dem primary votes, yet over 3000 precintcts to report.

How high can out turnout go and who wins teh remainig votes?

Phillip, please advise. Where is your Dad tonight? He ALWAYS has the right answers.


[ Parent ]
Obama (0.00 / 0)
My Dad is working on the caucus returns. I still think Obama will turnout well in the final ballots. There's a reason those ballots are taking so long to be reported...there's so much to report.

Now, a very great man once said that some people rob you with a fountain pen.

[ Parent ]
These networks might have egg on their faces (0.00 / 0)
This could VERY well become another MO. Oh and I still give Obama TX by less than 2%.

100% Right (0.00 / 0)
Basically, CNN can't handle waiting. If you wait -- and yes, it will be serveral more hours -- you'll see what's going on. Senator Clinton's boxes are coming in in South Texas, and Obama is still neck and neck. Wait until the urban areas start reporting...

Bingo.  SD 20 is half in, while SD 13 hasn't really begun to report.  It's still way too early.


call Brooks county for Chris Dodd (0.00 / 0)
It was a close call with Bill Richardson, but Dodd did it! on to PA!

http://enr.sos.state.tx.us/enr...


[ Parent ]
OBAMA wins by 1% (0.00 / 0)
I just entered all of the data from the exit polls and based on the information into Mark Blumenthal's calculator and based on the results Obama wins by 1%. I hope this is so.

Harris County (0.00 / 0)
very slow in updating, but if their website is to be believed, BHO only has a 5,200 vote margin in election day totals. This can't hold true when all the votes are counted, especially as strong as he ran in EV. And of course, it all depends on the areas of town reporting and not reporting.

http://www.election.co.harris....


[ Parent ]
Go Noriega (5.00 / 1)
Yes, you heard right.  I hope he stays there at 50%, nobody wants a runoff with Gene Kelly.  I would also like to say that  38% of Texas Democrats are complete morons.

Ahead of TX SOS (0.00 / 0)
The NY Times is ahead of TX SOS in reporting 73 to 67.  Good job Phil.

[ Parent ]
Why won't you update the senate google spreadsheet? (0.00 / 0)
Lord, it's been half an hour!

Senate Race (0.00 / 0)
As of 11:56 Noriega is clinging to a win with 50.34%.

[ Parent ]
Agreed (0.00 / 0)
I completely agree, I don't know why they called Texas.  I just looked at Dallas where he is beating her by over 30% and they have barely even counted there. Again, someone is going to have egg on their face tomorrow morning

County versus CNN (0.00 / 0)
CNN seems to be way ahead of at least the Harris County web page.  I assume that they are getting numbers from inside the campaigns.  Otherwise, this doesn't make sense.

Also, it looks like Al Edwards is going to beat Borris Miles.  


[ Parent ]
Do you know ... (0.00 / 0)
anything about which precincts in Harris County are outstanding, and which are in?

Harris just got updated (0.00 / 0)
I am shocked that BHO was only able to net 6,000 votes one day compared to his nearly 50,000 vote margin in earkly voting.

I guess the 3:00 am wake-up call scared people into voting their fears rather than hopes.


[ Parent ]
And/Or (0.00 / 0)
Obama blew it on the response to that ad. Just saying. You don't beat a point by reinforcing most of it.

[ Parent ]
Noreiga (0.00 / 0)
Nice to see that the campaign is moving along so well that he barely gets a majority against three non-factors.

At least he's pulling far ahead of Barbara Ann Radnofsky's March 2006 showing.

Eventually there'll just need to be a better candidate, instead of continually bashing people who vote for Gene Kelly because they've never heard of the frontrunner. (Darned uneducated voters, did they not see Barbara Ann Radnofsky's blog ads bashing Bill O'Reilly? Ha)


My thoughts (0.00 / 0)
the ridiculous voter turnout made it impossible to target anyone this point. With our nice,new, refreshed, vote roles we should be in much better shape for our primary in 2010. Gene Kelly will not get out of this ever again with our new data.

[ Parent ]
Mark Thompson? (0.00 / 0)
Does this mean that Mark Thompson will put a photo of himself on his web page?

who is he? (0.00 / 0)
seriously, who?

[ Parent ]
12:20pm? (0.00 / 0)
"am" Phillip, "am"

which reminds me that I need to crash.


You won't have Boris Miles to kick around anymore (0.00 / 0)
A bunch of Incumbent upsets in the house

Sam Houston for the Supreme Court? (0.00 / 0)
Yeah, this has to be case of name approval trumping most anything else. Even more so than Gene Kelly.

"Name approval trumping everything else"? Not at all! Sam Houston (3.00 / 1)
won a clean sweep of the state's newspaper endorsements, he won the Texas Bar Association judicial candidate poll, he won the endorsement of most major Democratic organizations, and he won the support of many elected Democrats across Texas.

Sam won because he was the clear choice.

Will the name help him in the general election?  Probably.  But we must make use of every advantage available to us so we can overthrow the corrupt corporitists currently running the Texas Obscene Court.  

http://yanezhoustonjordanfortx...


[ Parent ]
I agree (0.00 / 0)
that Houston was by far the best choice; and I am so glad he won.  I helped gather signatures to make sure he got on the ballot and he will be a great Supreme Court justice.

However, a good name does matter.  

Here the question is how did they matter in this race.  A great name like Sam Houston is surely worth a few points, but usually we think that a Hispanic name is worth a few points in the Texas Democratic Primary.

I think in this race the battle of the names was a psuh and we had the better candidate winning.

Of course, another question is why in so many races someone besides the most qualified candidate was the winner.

I know Solomon said that sometimes the race does not go to the fastest, but some of these results make you scratch your head.

Thanks, Eric


[ Parent ]
Call it! It's early in the morning... (0.00 / 0)
but it's already a great day, and Clinton has taken the primary in Texas!  Along with OH, and RI, she has taken 3/4!

Also, Bastrop County (my little part of the world)went 52-45 for Clinton.

WooHoo!


and how many net delegates is that? (0.00 / 0)
It's all about the delegates.  

[ Parent ]
HILLARY CLINTON (1.00 / 1)
won very, very big tonite:  Texas AND Ohio AND Rhode Island.

Hillary will go on to win Pennsylvania, Puerto Rico, and the nomination.

You all took a huge risk parking this blog so firmly in the Obama camp, and going so negative on Hillary. I hope you'll be able to switch gears and get behind Hillary soon.  She's a tough, smart candidate who deserves your support.    


Show us the math that shows she wins it. (3.00 / 1)
n/t

"There's nothing new except for the history that you don't know."
-HST

Justice Addict


[ Parent ]
Well she has to win every state by 63% without (3.00 / 1)
Mi/Fl...57% with Mi/Fl

And, tomorrow she will no longer have a lead in superdelagetes...so, I'm quite comfortable with this blog siding with the progressive candidate


[ Parent ]
define won big (2.00 / 1)
she' up one delegate in TX for now--all her votes are in, Harris County is still out. Those poor folks had to wait until almost midnight to vote and caucus.

Speaking of caucuses, Obama is winning those handily. She will  end up with a net loss in delegates here. TX doesn't apportion by popular vote, it apportions by senate district.

And oh yeah, wasn't she up by 20 points in OH and TX two weeks ago? I don't call that a big win. I call that hanging on.

Read below. She isn't getting the love here, we won't be behind her.


[ Parent ]
Hillary is going to have a serious problem (3.00 / 1)
African-Americans, like myself have been pissed at the race baiting since South Carolina and refuse to vote for her under any circumstances. If Hillary decides to "steal" the nomination AA's will not only sit out the General Election but they will not vote for Democrats in the future as they will see this as the DNC not doing anything to stop this madness  and will start  to give the Republican party a second look.  This could be detrimental to the Democratic Party for a good 30 years or more.  At the end of the day, Democrats need African-Americans  as the Latino vote is far more fluid in its support of Dems.

it's not just AAs she's burning bridges with (0.00 / 0)
let's add in the scorched earth politicking she's done the past week or so. Do I want my country to be run by someone who was elected by men from Chillicothe OH who think that Obama is a terrorist because he won't wear a lapel pin? (while she nods as says "not that I know of")

I can't decide if I'd go Nader on her ass, or just go McCain.

--disgruntled female boomer


[ Parent ]
Texas Secretary of State website also has Pres results by senate district (0.00 / 0)
http://enr.sos.state.tx.us/enr...

A little more up to date than the spreadsheet.

"I love America more than any other country in this world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually."- James A. Baldwin


Yeah (0.00 / 0)
It does, b/c I can't update that many things simultaneously...

Now, a very great man once said that some people rob you with a fountain pen.

[ Parent ]
Dissapointing. (0.00 / 0)
Not only presidential, but seems like all the candidates I was supporting locally, Grant, Maxey, etc. lost as well.

On the flip side, I think including the caucus Texas will be a net gain for Obama.  Hillary will win 1-4 net delegates in the primary, but I think the caucuses will reverse that.

Also, looking here: http://enr.sos.state.tx.us/enr...

Obama won early voting by about 3%, Hilary won on election day by about 4.5%.  Also I checked about 30 minutes ago and Obama won early voting in the campus precincts 3-1, but election day results hadn't been released yet.

"I love America more than any other country in this world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually."- James A. Baldwin


Cool NYT map, let's you see map by margin of victory as well. (0.00 / 0)
http://politics.nytimes.com/el...

Useful for seeing which areas helped each candidate.

"I love America more than any other country in this world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually."- James A. Baldwin


SD 19 is missing a delegate? (0.00 / 0)
Is SD 19 missing a delegate? the sum of the candidates is only 3, but the SD gets 4...

Just checking, thanks.


Delegate numbers (0.00 / 0)
Philip,
Total delegates are 126. Your 1.00 am update totals 125. You need to add 1 delegate to Senator Obama at SD19 and subtract one from Senator Clinton according to your recent comment.
This means both Senators are tied for delegates at 63 each!

Delegate numbers (0.00 / 0)
With respect to my earlier comment, do not take a delegate from Clinton, just add one to Obama. Same result. Both Senators have 63 delegates in the primary - its a tie!

Delegate numbers (0.00 / 0)
SOS figures for the primary, 95% in, sadly, show Clinton 64, Obama 62 on delegates. He is, however, digging in to her popular vote lead.

Burnt Orange Reader

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Poll
Who would you vote for in the Democratic Primary for Ag Commission?
Kinky Friedman
Hank Gilbert

Results

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- A Capitol Blog
- As the Island Floats
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- Latinos for Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Burnt Orange Reporters
Publisher - Karl-Thomas M.
Editor-in-Chief - Matt G.
Staff Writer - David M.
Staff Writer - Katherine H.
Staff Writer - Michael H.
Staff Writer - Todd H.
Man of Mystery - Phillip M.
Founder - Byron L.

Powered by: SoapBlox