| When one campaign starts making petty, distracting, half-baked charges against their opponents, you know something is up. But what?
The latest is the accusation by the Clinton camp that Barack Obama's use of a friend's phrase -- on that friend's specific advice -- is somehow wrong, is plagiarism. Or something.
These kinds of silly charges often surface in close, hard-fought campaigns. Once, when our staff at Ann Richard's 1990 campaign got into one of these petty-offs with a Republican primary candidate, she mocked us -- publicly. "Boys and their toys," she said, in the newspaper. It stung.
Except for the gender exclusiveness, that's exactly what's going on with the accusation that Obama plagiarized his friend Deval Patrick's words. Everyone knows it's silly. Everyone knows it has no bearing on character, the substance of the campaign, the power of Obama's oratory, the originality of his thought as displayed in two books and countless speeches.
If anyone is copying anything, it's the Clinton's copying the old campaign trick of distraction. Anything, no matter how silly, how truth-stretching, how off-the-subject, is fair to throw at one's opponent when their momentum seems unstoppable. Any few minutes eaten into their time in the news cycle might make some small difference. I guess.
I don't have much patience for this childishness anymore.
Note from Phillip: One of President Bill Clinton's former speechwriters agrees with Glenn... |