Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
January 20, 2006The Pot Calling The Kettle A Voucher Advocate: What Won't She Do To Get Ahead?By Vince LeibowitzCarole Keeton McClellan Rylander Stayhorn...what are we going to do with you, honey? Like a stubmling nursing home patient who forgot to take her "memory pills," and accused her own son of hiding the family silver where she couldn't find it, 'One Tough Grandma' Carole Strayhorn today accused GOP Governor Rick Perry of dismantling public schools in favor of vouchers. Poor 'One Tough Grandma!' I guess she forgot to take her Ginko, because all of her commercials I see on television, though she proclaims herself a "Texas Independent" end up having the word "REPUBLICAN" flash down somewhere on the right hand side of the screen at some point. Not to mention the fact that back in 1998, she was all about being supreme voucher advocate (and right-wing Sugar Daddy) James Leininger's bitch when he guaranteed a $950,000 loan that helped catapult her into office with that landslide .05 percent of the vote. Sure. She has the TSTA endorsement. She's gotta complain about vouchers and claim that Rick Perry is going to destroy public education as we know it. That Perry will destroy public schools with vouchers is true, so in that regard, I'm not calling Mrs. Keeton McClellan Rylander Strayhorn a liar. However, I do not recall her ever coming out so strongly against vouchers prior to her exploring a race for governor. Now, if anyone else does, please, by all means, correct me. I've Googled the subject to death, and found nothing substantive. To be fair, I also Googled around to find articles about Strayhorn (yes, I Googled under all the various and sundry names) supporting vouchers and found little except the fact that, duh, Leinninger and other voucher advocates have given her tons of money over the years. Of course, when she started sparring with Perry, Dewhurst, Craddick, et al circa 2003-2004, that did stop or decline, as I recall from media accounts at the time. So, what's the real deal with 'One Tough Grandma?' It's easy to say that Carole Four Names either (a) never supported vouchers or only mildly supported them or (b) she still supports them and is lying because it's politically appropriate right now. However, I believe the cold, hard, naked truth swirling around Strayhorn like the smell of urine at an animal shelter is that she simply says and does whatever is politically expiedient for her at the time and whatever she believes will help her get ahead the fastest to the next level. Look at her past: Strayhorn's nothing but a chameleon who changes her spots/stripes/political colors to suit her own ambition. She's had more differing opinions and political viewpoints than she has had last names. Though I'm sure readers of BOR are tired of me referring to the classic Austin Chronicle piece from '98 about Strayhorn, just recall this quote from that article if you have any doubts about whether Texas' 'One Tough Grandma' cares more about Texas or her own political ambitions:
Vintage Chameleon Carole. Her political career is easily likened to the stereotypical wealthy suburban houswife who goes through a divorce, gets a new set of friends, joins a new church, becomes the beneficiary of her husband's new money, gets another divorce, gets remarried, and then gets new friends, a new church and new money. Except (and in spite of the four names) her divorces were from political parties. She divorced the Democrats, and now has divorced the Republicans, although it's clear that divorce is far from finalized given she still has the affiliation on some of her campaign commercials. So, is it a lapse of memory for 'One Tough Grandma' or simply the blind ambition of a political chameleon who would eat their young (if they weren't serving in the Bush administration) to get ahead? I'll say it's the latter, but maybe a dose of the former. So, calm on down, 'Grandma,' and just sit in your rocker a spell, hon. There's not anyone in Texas who doesn't know what you're doing. Just take a memory pill and keep takin' those pot shots at Rick Perry. You'll help the real Democrats by doing so and it will all be all right come November. All right for Texas, that is. Because a real Democrat will be in the governor's mansion (hopefully). Either way, you'll be out of state government for good and looking for your next political fix. Posted by Vince Leibowitz at January 20, 2006 05:44 PM | TrackBackComments
Oh what will we do with that lady. That's lady with two L's. Posted by: Karl-T at January 20, 2006 07:23 PM"lightning-quick conversion"??? Mark White might disagree about his State Board of Insurance member. Anyone remember the Governor sitting on the front row of ratemaking hearings to emphasis his point? Posted by: notgannatell at January 20, 2006 08:03 PMIn my adult life I have evolved from Liberal Democrat, to Republican, to Libertarian and now a Centrist. Things change: circumstances, philosophy, party leadership. I believe this is true for Carole. She is basically a pragmatist not an ideologue. She is looking for what works without regard for the label or the source. As with most Centrists she may believe that Vouchers can play a role in some chroncially underperforming schools but are not a reasonable solution to the overwhelming majority of well run school districts. This is the way many of us in the middle think about these issues. Not as black or white, but in shades of grey. And we favor candidates that can do likewise. Posted by: Paul at January 21, 2006 09:09 AMWell said, Paul. My father was once a Goldwater Republican, but is now a centrist Democrat. Does that make him a hypocrite just because his political views have evolved? I would argue that we all grow wiser with time. Several folks on this blog quickly forgave Bob Gammage despite his bad votes on abortion and minimum wage. Why not give the same benefit of the doubt to Carole? After all, the teachers (who are directly affected by this voucher issue) seemed to have moved on. Posted by: Ian at January 21, 2006 10:29 AMFYI. She's dropped the word "Republican" from her TV ads, too. Posted by: Ed at January 21, 2006 11:18 AMI noticed after this post that she had dropped the word "Republican" from all but one of her ads that are still running in this market. Anyway, I don't dispute that people evolve. BUT, I don't think Strayhorn just "evolved." She's a little bit of a different character. Just look at her past. That first switch just about says it all. Posted by: Vince Leibowitz at January 21, 2006 12:01 PMMaybe her current husband is all over the map ideologically and she is merely adhering to the Republican dictum of "husband first, party second" like Kay Bailey Hutchison, who probably should register as a lobbyist for Vinson & Elkins. One thing about Strayhorn is she makes Bell look good. At least he knows what day it is. I think. Posted by: Baby Snooks at January 21, 2006 01:21 PM"As with most Centrists she may believe that Vouchers can play a role in some chroncially underperforming schools but are not a reasonable solution to the overwhelming majority of well run school districts." That is true, and that may indeed be her position, but then Perry is not too far from that either. Modest school choice proposals that targetted only failed schools were shot down in the last session by anti-school-choice legislators fearing even a So it is demagoguery to talk in apocalyptic terms of Perry's position on school choice when, as noted, she's not be too far from Perry's view. Being pro-school-choice is not anti-public-school, they can thrive together, unless you believe our public schools are so awful they couldnt stand competition and require captive student populations to survive. Posted by: Patrick at January 21, 2006 02:09 PMIan: I think if Goldwater were still alive he'd now be a centrist Democrat. People change; people make mistakes. It's admitting them, correcting them and moving forward that shows a persons true character. I don't have a problem with Carole for changing a position as long as it's genuine. However, she still has the same problem as all the R's at the top... they're peevish and petty little people with a 'gotcha last' attitude that does nothing to fix the problems in this state. Posted by: original TREY at January 21, 2006 02:39 PMMemory pills..and the pot calling the kettle black...speaking of which, Vince, didn't Texas have a Democratic gubernatorial candidate (Tony Sanchez) who was a Bush Pioneer (donated more than $200,000 to Bush's presidential campaign) and was appointed by Bush to the UT Board of Regents, then ran for governor as a Democrat when the opportunity presented itself? Trey says: Memory pills..and the pot calling the kettle black...speaking of which, Vince, didn't Texas have a Democratic gubernatorial candidate (Tony Sanchez) who was a Bush Pioneer (donated more than $200,000 to Bush's presidential campaign) and was appointed by Bush to the UT Board of Regents, then ran for governor as a Democrat when the opportunity presented itself? I say: You are correct. Although I don't think Tony Sanchez is the hypoctite Carole Strayhorn is, I wasn't saying that Strayhorn is the only person out for her own personal political gain. Also, remember that Sanchez was recruited to the ticket by others who actually thought that he'd been a Bush Pioneer would be appealing, I guess. Posted by: Vince Leibowitz at January 21, 2006 04:38 PMIf the Democratic nominee can't crack 30%, and one of the independents has truly connected with the voting public, then what? If we have a chance of dethroning Perry with an independent, then will we be realistic or stubborn? My view is that anybody is better than Rick Perry, including Carole or Kinky. I'm hoping that 2006 is the year that Democrats finally stop the bleeding and re-take the Governor's Mansion, but I'm keeping an open mind. Ian: Don't too much faith in early polls, especially Zogby. I'm suprised anyone still listens to Zogby given their performance in 2004. Posted by: original TREY at January 21, 2006 08:34 PM"I think if Goldwater were still alive he'd now be a centrist Democrat." Goldwater voted against the 1964 Civil Rights Act beacuse he thought it infringed on people's private property rights. Say what you will about Barry Goldwater, but the man was a conservative Republican. Posted by: RMG at January 22, 2006 03:41 PMPost a comment
|
|