Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
June 14, 2005Thinking about TexasBy Karl-Thomas MusselmanThis morning I had a chance to catch some coffee with Chris Bell blogger guy Jason Stanford on the Drag here in Austin. Being a bit late thanks to a cantankerous alarm clock, I didn’t recognize him at first but figured that it was one of the two guys sitting outside by himself. In any case, it was refreshing to chat with him, about the nature of the Bell campaign, Texas strategy changes in this elections compared to last, and the importance of not taking the base for granted in Texas statewide elections anymore. I’ll be the first to admit that I’m more of a liberal Democrat when it comes to campaign candidates, styles, and strategies. I’m the kind of person that is attracted to campaigns that are innovative, grassrootsy, and maybe odd. I was a Deaniac, the closest thing to a Margot Clarke supporter on this blog, and someone who will sign Jennifer Gale’s ballot access petitions at 1:30 AM in the middle of the Drag for whatever race she may run. But having spent some time around Byron and Andrew, as well as many of the Austin politicos, I have a greater respect for some of the more old-fashioned Democrats and campaign styles. It’s not that I think they are wrong; it’s just that I think that we keep trying them and losing. (See 2002 as Example A-F) In small local elections, be it out in the Hill Country or East Texas, getting some old LBJ family member or Texas legend to run and win can work and should be done. But the days are fading where we can continue to do that on a statewide level and hope that our never-changing strategy of huge turnout in the Valley and Urban Counties will give us a win over the other 230 counties in the state. Why? Because those two regions would be our base, and when campaigns are set up the way they have been, we offer very little for our base to get out and vote for. Since the old way isn’t working, and we can only wait around so long for demographics to turn our way (while the GOP eats away into our traditional Hispanic support), why don’t we try something different? Let’s run against corruption in a mainstream to populist way (in a slightly less “Van Os”ian way). Let’s run Bell against Perry (like Kinky is). Let’s run a Courage against Smith. Let’s run primary challenges against turncoat/Craddickrats. On the state and federal Texas elections, let’s run on reform and good government. That’s not liberal or conservative. It’s just Good and Right. Run on that and you won’t have to worry as much about the social politics which always dog us. To crib from Kinky, Why the Hell not? Comments
Or to crib from the late Sam Peckinpah/Warren Oates in my favorite film, "The Wild Bunch," simply "Why not." Win or lose in the short run, it's crucial to stay in the game and get well practiced for the long haul. And to crib from my late old man: "there's always the unexpected, isn't there?" Posted by: Tom Coleman at June 15, 2005 12:38 PMI think you are dead right. We do need to move away from the old caliche and patron style politics. As a Rio Grande Valley resident of Cameron County, I was stunned when Bush won Democratic Cameron County. There were reliable Democratic precincts in neighboring Willacy County that voted for Bush, though Kerry still won, just barely. I understand Kerry was a terrible candidate, but losing should not have happened in one of the last Democratic Bastions in Texas, but it did. It freaks me out to see how much the Republican Party is siphoning off Hispanics in the Valley. Unacceptable! Posted by: Edward G. at June 15, 2005 01:37 PMand where did jason stanford's comments fit into this? Posted by: Curious at June 15, 2005 01:48 PMJason and I talked about a wide variety of things, mostly about the Bell campaign, but some about Democrats problems with elections in Texas. That conversation led me to think about such things again and make this post. It's not a shill for the Bell campaign. I'm not on their payroll or anything if that is your concern. I'd be sure to disclose that if I was. Posted by: Karl-Thomas at June 15, 2005 04:11 PMNote to Edward G in regards to how "It freaks [him] out to see how much the Republican Party is siphoning off Hispanics in the Valley". Has it ever occurred to him that Hispanics, just like other racial groups, are made up of individuals that have the capacity for individual thought and just might vote based on their understanding of the world and the issues? Comments like this are one of the things that drive me crazy about the Democratic Party. There is an implicit, racist condensation toward Hispanics (and other racial groups) when these kinds of comments are made because such comments assume that "Hispanics" (apparently unlike whites) can only have one point of view (e.g. that of the Democratic Party). Much like the political disagreements that exist within "white" America, political disagreements exist within "Hispanic", "black", "Asian", etc. America. Mr. G can make a commment like "It freaks me out to see how much the Republican Party is siphoning off Hispanics in the Valley", but if he were to substitute "white" for "Hispanic" in the same sentence, he would be looked at as some sort of freak. It could be this sort of implicit racism that is driving people away from the message of the Democratic Party into the arms of the Republican Party. Posted by: Anonymous Independent Thinker at June 16, 2005 11:30 AMQuick prediction: The GOP sweeps every statewide elected office in 2006, no matter what candidates the Democrats throw up there, no matter how innovative their strategies are, no matter if you try to frame this in terms of reform and good government, no matter if Republicans run lousy campaigns top-to-bottom. Democrats lose on the ideas. Texans just disagree with the way the Democrats think. You would be the perfect example of that, actually. Texans really can't stand people like Margot Clarke and Jennifer Gale. Posted by: Will Franklin at June 16, 2005 09:45 PMWell that's a good thing, because Texas doesn't depend on Margot and Jennifer. In fact, I'm not sure who depends on Jennifer, other than comedians. Posted by: Karl-Thomas at June 16, 2005 10:55 PMWhy are Margot Clarke and Jennifer Gale being lumped together anyway? They're not anything alike. Posted by: Bob Streeter at June 19, 2005 10:44 AMPost a comment
|
|