HJR 6 Update
By Karl-Thomas Musselman
Ok, I had to go hunt this down on the LGRL blog to find out why today's second reading vote on HJR 6 means it was passed to the Senate without needing a third reading in the House.
Joint resolutions are used to propose amendments to the Texas Constitution, ratify proposed amendments to the U.S. Constitution, or request a constitutional convention to propose amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Joint resolutions proposing amendments to the Texas Constitution require a vote of two-thirds of the total membership of each house for adoption. Other joint resolutions require a simple majority vote in each house for adoption. A joint resolution takes the same course through both houses as a bill and is like a bill in all respects, except that, in the house, if it receives the required number of votes at any reading after the first reading, the resolution is passed. Three readings are still required to pass a joint resolution in the senate.
And to think, any 2 Aye votes could have just voted present and not voting and this would have been that much closer to dieing. My personal gripe, shame on Rep. Patrick Rose. I gave money to your last campaign but don't be expecting any from me the next go round.
Posted by Karl-Thomas Musselman at April 25, 2005 11:50 PM
| TrackBack
The Patrick Rose vote doesn't surprise me at all. He's never struck me as anything better than a moderate and fence sitter.
Damn, to have the good 'ole days when Libby Linebarger was in that seat. Actually, she wasn't all that great, but she did a better job than Rose!