Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
February 26, 2005A Close Look at CD 23By Byron LaMastersI read Charles Kuffner's post on the looming primary fight in CD 28 (currently held by Henry Cuellar, previously held by Ciro Rodriguez, and eyed by State Rep. Richard Raymond). Kuff (among others) has pointed out that Richard Raymond should take a serious look at running in CD 23 which would be open if Henry Bonilla runs for the U.S. Senate. I started writing a comment, but an hour of typing and research later (yes, I'm a big dork), I developed a detailed analysis of Democratic chances in CD 23. The DPI (Democratic Performance Index) of CD 23 (based on 2002 data - pdf file) is 43.2, whereas the DPI of CD 28 is 58.9. That begs the question of how much can an intense voter persuasion campaign shift the DPI? I decided to take a look at the 2002 DPI of the six congressional races with well funded Democrats, and compare that with the 2004 election results. Here's what we get: Data District 1 (Sandlin) District 2 (Lampson) District 17 (Edwards) District 19 (Stenholm) District 22 (Morrison) District 32 (Frost) Analysis In four of six races, the Democratic candidate ran 7 points or better ahead of the DPI - the margin a Democrat would need in order to win in CD 23. A well-funded Democrat running an intense voter persuasion campaign has a real shot at winning an open CD 23 in 2006. However, several other factors should be considered as well. First, it is very probable that the DPI of CD 23 decreased in 2004. Webb County (Laredo) turned out very heavily for Tony Sanchez and the Democratic ticket in 2002. The turnout was only slightly higher and decidedly less Democratic in 2004: 2002 U. S. Senator 2002 Governor 2004 President/Vice-President The abortion issue obviously hurt John Kerry in Webb County with the high profile campaign in the Catholic Church made against Kerry. Webb County is overwhelmingly Hispanic and Catholic. Other down-ballot Democrats significantly outperformed Kerry: 2004 Railroad Commissioner 2004 Justice, Supreme Court, Place 9 2004 Judge, Court of Criminal Appeals Place 6 From these numbers it is clear that John Kerry’s performance is an anomaly, and that a generic Democrat can expect to receive a sizeable margin from the county. Hispanic candidates of any party run very well here. Perhaps most instructive is to look at the Supreme Court race where there were two White candidates. If Van Os’s total is what a generic Democrat can expect out of Webb County, then that would peg the DPI in the high sixties – still a nearly 20 point drop from 2002. Conclusions Even though only half of Webb County is in CD 23, the massive drop in Democratic performance in 2004 in the county severely reduces the DPI of the district as a whole. Finding the exact DPI of CD 23 in 2004 would take a bit of time and research, but one can reasonably conclude that the DPI decreased in 2004 from the 2002 DPI of 43.2. Another factor to consider is what kind of candidate would be best for Democrats to run in an open CD 23. Would someone like Richard Raymond – who took a very high profile and partisan role during the 2003 redistricting fight, be the best candidate to run in a GOP-leaning district? Should a more conservative candidate be recruited? The ideology of the candidate didn’t seem to make that big of a difference in the ability of a candidate to run a successful voter persuasion campaign. Martin Frost was a prominent member of the Democratic leadership for many years and had a voting record in the mainstream of the Democratic Party and still ran 8.3 points ahead of the DPI. On the other hand Blue Dog Max Sandlin ran only 0.7 ahead of the DPI. Conservatives Charlie Stenholm and Chet Edwards ran very successful voter persuasion campaigns as well. I would argue that the candidate mattered less than the campaign. Chet Edwards, Martin Frost, Charlie Stenholm and Richard Morrison all ran campaigns where swing voters were highly targeted and many GOP-leaning voters crossed over to vote for them. Looking at the tactics used by those campaigns should give us insight as to how those efforts could be replicated in a district such as CD 23. Posted by Byron LaMasters at February 26, 2005 02:10 AM | TrackBackComments
Do you mean Henry Cuellar ("D") or Henry Bonilla (R)? I seriously hope Henry Cuellar has no further political ambitions. Posted by: Jim D at February 26, 2005 04:22 AMwhoops... I changed that.... it's Henry Bonilla running for the Senate, not Cuellar... too many Henry's.... Posted by: Byron L at February 26, 2005 04:35 AMDistrict 23 can be won by a Democrat, but it has much lower Hispanic registration and participation and a lower rate of performance in general elections for Hispanic candidates of choice. While it could flip, an intense GOP effort could make it tough going. And remember, the state GOP hates, absolutely hates, your candidate. Posted by: keith at February 26, 2005 10:44 AMI thought the 23rd was made more GOP through DeLay's gerrymandering. Most of Laredo (heavily Democratic) is in Cuellar's 28th now. Bonilla's much safer than he was in 2002 due to the new map. Posted by: Nathaniel at February 26, 2005 10:57 AMCorrect, correct. Redistricting sliced Webb County (Laredo) in half - half in the 28th and half in the 23rd. Webb County was by far the most Democratic portion of the 23rd, so I think redistricting had the district go from something like 48 DPI to 42. Keith - I know that the state GOP hates Raymond. The Democratic activist base loves the guy - but that won't win you a 42% Dem district. That's why I don't think that he would be the best candidate for CD 23. Raymond's best hope for serving in Congress would be to run in CD 28. That's why I've been decidedly less vocal than other Texas Dem bloggers (Kuff..) in urging Raymond to run in the 23nd if it were to open up. Posted by: Byron L at February 26, 2005 11:58 AMByron, you make a fair point, but who would you prefer to run in CD23? We need a candidate there whether Bonilla is running for reelection or not, a sentiment with which I know you agree. I don't know the area well enough to suggest an alternative. Posted by: Charles Kuffner at February 26, 2005 05:32 PMA democrat is not winning in 23, too much hill country, too much northside SA. Posted by: Tek_XX at February 26, 2005 08:00 PMI am familiar with the NW side of San Antonio. It's not as affulent as Alamo Heights, but it's a middle-to upper middle class Republican area. A Dem will have to get a huge turnout in the border areas El Paso, Del Rio, and Laredo to match NW San Antone, Bandera, and Kerr counties. I don't know how well SA Councilman Art Hall has done in the NW precincts, plus he's unproven outside S.A. But he is a good articulate candidate who would make a good case for votes of the 23rd. Posted by: pc at February 28, 2005 06:38 PMPost a comment
|
|