Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
December 30, 2003Ashcroft Tries to Dodge the BulletBy Andrew DobbsFrom the AP: Attorney General John Ashcroft removed himself Tuesday from the investigation into whether the Bush administration leaked a CIA operative's name to a newspaper columnist, and a career federal prosecutor from Chicago was named as special counsel to take over. In a move cheered by Democrats, Deputy Attorney General James Comey announced that Ashcroft had stepped aside to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest after reviewing evidence recently developed in the inquiry. He would not specify the nature of that evidence. Comey said U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald in Chicago, a veteran of terrorism and political corruption cases, would take over as a special prosecutor and would be given "the tools to conduct a completely independent investigation." Note the interesting grammar here, maybe I'm reading too much into this but perhaps I'm not: Comey announced that Ashcroft had stepped aside to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest after reviewing evidence recently developed in the inquiry. Other stories have noted that Ashcroft kept very close tabs on the investigation, being briefed on every new news that came up. Now, after reviewing all of this, after hearing all of this confidential information he's doing a complete 180 on the administration's policy and passing the buck to someone else. If he had done this from the beginning we'd just say that he was being cautious, being honest. Now, after the investigation has been on going, it seems as though he's trying to get out of the way of an oncoming freight train. Whoever it is that betrayed the secrecy of a CIA agent's identity- whether its the Democrats' dream of Karl Rove or some low level person without any political weight attached to him/her it is important that they go to jail for a long long time. Putting the lives of Americans and American allies at risk for political gain is shameful and ought to be punished. The thing that chaps my ass is how nonchalant Bush seems to be treating this. This ought to be project number one- get the traitor- but it isn't for some reason. Still, looks like someone else, Jim Comley to be exact, will see it in that light. To recap- "senior level Bush Administration official" puts the lives of unknown numbers of Americans and American allies at risk so that he can one-up an enemy of administration and no one seems to know who it is and Bush seems to not care too much. He hands the job off to Johnny Ashcroft down at the DOJ who keeps a close eye on things. Democrats ask for someone not directly associated with the administration to take over but the Administration gives em the finger. Finally, Ashcroft looks at everything for a while and lickity split he calls up someone else and gets the hell out of dodge, thereby contradicting what everyone's been saying all along. Now why would anyone suspect something fishy about that? Posted by Andrew Dobbs at December 30, 2003 09:50 PM | TrackBackComments
Just an FYI, Fitzpatrick is the USA (US Attorney) that brought the corruption charges against former Illinois Governor Ryan. Fitzpatrick is hardly an independent investigator. He is, as all USAs are, a political appointee who answers to John Ashcroft. I confess I know little about Fitzpatricks' background, but I do know how the US Attorneys Offices work (having worked in one myself). The USAs are NOT independent - they are subordinates of Main Justice in DC. (This administration especially has a reputation for reigning in any autonomous decision making at the local US Att. Office level). Posted by: WhoMe? at December 30, 2003 11:40 PMFirst of all, to WhoMe?: It's Fitzgerald NOT Fitzpatrick. If anything, there seems to be a shortage of surnames among Illinois Republicans. Local hardline Republicans here in Illinois were disappointed when Sen. Peter Fitzgerald pushed for the appointment of Patrick Fitzgerald (no relation) as U.S. Attorney for the district of Northern Illinois. Patrick F. was seen as too impartial and not partisan enough by hardcore Bushies. Indeed, his appointment was greeted with praise by the local media and relief by local Democrats. In 2002, Democratic Congressman Rod Blagojevich defeated Republican Attorney General Jim Ryan and became Illinois' first Democratic governor in 26 years. While Rod probably would have won anyway, he was certainly helped by the fact that many voters confused Jim Ryan with Gov. George Ryan (no relation). Patrick F. already had an impressive conviction rate against the then governor's cronies and associates. While George Ryan is best know outside the state for his opposition to the death penalty, much of the media coverage he's gotten in Illinois over the past few years has focused on corruption charges. Certainly nobody is 100% free of political bias. But locally, the feeling is that Patrick Fitzgerald is as good as it gets. It's not likely he would tarnish the excellent reputation he's gotten in Illinois and New York by permitting himself to become a willing dupe for John Ashcroft or even Karl Rove. Tim Z, Thanks for the correction on Fitzgerald v. Fitzpatrick - All those Irish names sound alike to me. :) I was aware of Ryan's follies, which outside of Illinois seemed to have initially been reported as incidents within the agency responsible for commercial driver's licenses. I am glad to hear that the USA-NDIL has a reputation of even-handedness. Nonetheless, my suspicions still linger because of the structure of the DOJ. The USAs are very much tied to Main DOJ by an umbilical cord. Thanks for the insight into Illinois politics. By the way, who took over Dan Rostenkowski's seat? Posted by: WhoMe? at December 31, 2003 08:30 AMIn the wake of the postage stamp scandal, Rostenkowski was defeated in 1994 by Republican nobody, Michael Flanagan. On www.bushflash.com, there is a good link to a story about US Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald for those unfamilar with his background (like me up until now). He is a native New Yorker and was a career prosecutor in the US Attorneys office for the Southern District of New York (Manhattan, Bronx, Westchester, a few other counties, but NOT Brooklyn, Queens, Long Island). He developed a reputation for prosecuting the WTC bombing case (known as one of the "bomb boys"). Apparently, Sen. Fitzgerald (no relation) wanted someone as USA-NDIL with no ties to the local political establishment because Illinois politics are known as being so crooked, he wanted someone who had no apparent conflicts of interest. Tim, thanks for the info on Rostenkowski's old seat. I was curios whether Shakowski was the successor, but you cleared it up. I looked at the boundaries of the Ill 5th - it is kind of hard to tell, but it appears to have Lincoln Park, Lakeview, maybe some of Near North, and some of suburban Cook County. If the Rethuglican Re-ReDistricting map holds up in TX, I would love to see Illinois even the playing field (don't we have the numbers to set things straight in PA too?). The Rethuglicans started this, and we cannot lose the arms race. Posted by: WhoMe? at January 2, 2004 09:10 AMPost a comment
|
|