Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
June 25, 2003Re-Redistricting UpdateBy Byron LaMastersWith the special re-redistricting session less than a week away, there does not appear to be any Democratic plan to break quorum again. The Austin American Statesman reports. Meanwhile, the Houston Chronicle reports on Sen. Jeff Wentworth's (R-San Antonio) proposal to create an independent commission to deal with redistricting, taking it out of the hands of the legislature, much like what is done in Iowa, New Jersey, and several other states. It's a great idea, but I doubt that it will go anywhere. Here's what the Houston Chronicle says about it:
I like Wentworth's plan for the redistricting commission. If any good comes out of this special re-redistricting session, it would be taking redistricting out of the hands of the legislature. Democrats should have done this in the early 1990s when they were in charge. Wentworth is generally considered a moderate Republican. He narrowly won his primary challenge against a ultra-conservative opponent who had the support of the state party chair. Wentworth has made appeals to the conservative base this session, as he authored the Texas Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), and made the following statement:
Fortunately, the Lesbian, Gay Rights Lobby of Texas attacked him nearly daily for the statement, which pissed off Wentworth, but he's really not that anti-gay. He's just scared to death that he'll lose a Republican primary, as he is pro-choice, and generally moderate, and not beholden to the state party leadership. The Houston Chronicle also writes that two senators, Frank Madla, D-San Antonio and Bill Ratliff, R-Mount Pleasant were unsure of their vote on redistricting. The Dallas Morning News writes that Democrats are counting on the senate to kill re-redistricting. Posted by Byron LaMasters at June 25, 2003 01:22 AM | TrackBack Comments
I'm personally convinced that we're screwed on the redistricting. I do like Wentworth's plan, but it's not Tom DeLay Certified (tm), so I think it has the proverbial snowball's chance. Just because it's the right thing to do doesn't mean politicians of any stripe will get behind it. Posted by: Ginger at June 25, 2003 07:27 PMThe thing that is most disturbing about this re-redistricting mess is that no one is taking the entire price tag into consideration and then holding it up against the state budget and asking, 'where are you getting the money for this?' People say the cost will be $1.7 million; that's only part of the story. Like the war in Iraq, you can't see yet what this will cost in the end. Take this into consideration: The plan will end up in court: $3 million. Maybe $4 million if you consider the state's attorney made over $845,000 for representing the state in 1997 congressional redistricting trials. All changes in districts must be precleared by the Department of Justice before they can become law. Price: unknown. Once the DOJ gives its approval, the individual counties of this state have to re-draw any precinct lines that were split by the new congressional plan. Depending on when the approval finally comes, they may have to put in some overtime to get this done before the primary elections in 2004. They may have to hire attorneys to help them out, like they did in 2001. THEN after all of that, they TOO must submit their changes to the DOJ. In a county like Harris, Dallas, or Bexar, I would guess that would cost SEVERAL THOUSAND DOLLARS. So what are we looking at now? We're pushing the $10 million mark, baby. And remember: we can't afford to give our schoolchildren up-to-date textbooks; we can't afford to pay our teachers; we can't afford to provide healthcare to kids whose families can't afford it; and we've ALREADY been promised ANOTHER special session to fix school finance. Welcome to George Bush's Amerika! Posted by: quancuvo at June 26, 2003 01:23 PMPost a comment
|
|