Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond
Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Follow Burnt Orange Report on Twitter (@BOR) and Facebook.

Barbara Radnofsky Makes Countdown's 'World's Best Persons List'


by: Todd Hill

Fri Nov 20, 2009 at 10:16 AM CST


Barbara Ann Radnofsky wraps up a widely successful five-city announcement tour today culminating in a final appearance tonight at the Mid-Cities Democrats Birthday Bash in Euless.  Radnofsky, and her supporters, should be quite pleased with the large amount of earned media garnered from an entire week of hard campaigning.

You may have read this week that Barbara Radnofsky made news by declaring the 22-word clause (Subsection B) within the 2005 constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman-essentially banning unions between same-sex couples, may in fact null all marriages in Texas due to sloppy language.

Subsection B reads:

"This state or a political subdivision of this state may not create or recognize any legal status identical or similar to marriage."  

The language is certainly murky at best, and could be widely interpreted as to anull any form of marriage in Texas, but it was a constitutional amendment widely supported by the Texas legislature and overwhelmingly approved by Texas voters.  

However, that doesn't dismiss the fact that Republicans who authored the amendment, in their fit to curry political points by treating the LGBT community as their personal political piñata, may in fact have screwed up something that realistically should have been a political slam dunk.

For her work this week in raising awareness of this error that might require yet another constitutional amendment to fix, Radnofsky made Keith Olbermann's "World's Best Persons List" on MSNBC's Countdown.  You can view the video here.

ADVERTISEMENT
What I would add is that I do believe that Radnofsky is ultimately correct in pointing out the murky language, but I also believe that she is correct in that it would take another constitutional amendment to fix the problem.  That actually could work against Democrats and the LGBT community simply because same-sex unions and LGBT issues have been premier wedge issues and political fire for our opponents.  These constitutional amendments, a Karl Rove designed way of injecting wedge issues into elections, has proven to be effective in galvanizing people to the polls in recent cycles.  And certainly galvanizing people that Democrats would rather have stay home.    

So, lets just work hard to elect Barbara Radnofsky as Attorney General and get a Democratic state house and we won't have to worry about all of that.  

Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
During the campaign (0.00 / 0)
against that damned amendment, supporters of marriage equality tried to make that argument and were widely laughed off.

Yeah (0.00 / 0)
I remember.  

Todd

"You must be the change you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi


Silly argument (2.00 / 1)
They were laughed off because it is a silly argument, as any lawyer worth a damn should know.  Just because the language is murky doesn't mean it abolishes all marriages in Texas.

I am impressed by Radnofsky's energy and determination, but not her campaign. But what do I know - she got coverage on Countdown with that silly argument!


Silly is an understatement... (0.00 / 0)
The subsection serves one purpose. It bans civil unions.

There is something about V&E attorneys. My favorite is the Ouija Board Lady. The one who billed for telephone consultations with someone during the MUNY scandal, interesting that V&E always seems to be involved in the financial scandals, which in itself is not scandalous except for the fact that the person she billed had been dead for two years.

She lost my vote with this. Aparently you can take the girl out of V&E but you can't take V&E out of the girl.

She will have to come up with something else to get my vote back.

One thing she might become more proactive about is the appalling approach to domestic abuse/violence, sexual assault, and stalking in this state.

We need more prosecution of our laws. Not more education. And certainly not more "titty bar taxes" that she would have to defend.

One example of the state of things is the "stalking information" website that UT maintains which no doubt garnered a big chunk of VAWA funding to allow them to fully research and establish an information base for stalking victims and advocates.

http://homepage.psy.utexas.edu...

It might help if they had the actual law posted. The one they have posted is the old law that the legislature changed in 2001. So much for their "constantly updated information." Maybe someone from the UT Psychology Department will read this and finally "take the hint."


[ Parent ]
National coverage (3.00 / 1)
Is a good thing. Hope it brings some financial support from around the country for her campaign.

"The next time everyone will pay for it equally, and there won't be any more Chosen Nations, or any Others. Poor bastards all." ~The Boomer Bible

[ Parent ]
Jim Mattox (4.00 / 2)
Went to General Mattox's head stone dedication today on the one year anniversary of his death in 2008. If the Democrats want to get the Office of Attorney General back, I would suggest that Radnosky skip arguing with Abbot over the esoteric wording of a wedge issue constitutional amendment that passed in 2005.  She needs to get back on Mattox's core message of the AG as the "People's Attorney".

We want an AG that protects our water and air quality. We want an AG that protects consumers from price fixing, restraint of free trade, and knowingly selling dangerous products to the public by corporations. We want an AG that cares about civil rights for all and fair trails for criminal defendants. We want an AG that will collect past due child support. We need an AG that will be a tireless fighter for the average working families in Texas.


No, Seriously (1.00 / 1)
The best way to encourage voters down the ticket is to have someone at the top of the ticket running around saying marriage is illegal. I see a Dem sweep in Texas next fall.

[ Parent ]
Completely agree (0.00 / 0)
It is hard to believe it has been a year since the loss of Jim Mattox. Thanks for the reminder of the powerful effect a "people's attorney" can have as AG.

[ Parent ]
The Economist, too (3.00 / 1)
I just found that the Economist joined in by pointing out this issue: at the "Lexington's Notebook" blog

"Let us tenderly and kindly cherish therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write."  -  John Adams

Burnt Orange Reader

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Poll
Who would you vote for in the Democratic Primary for Ag Commission?
Kinky Friedman
Hank Gilbert

Results

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- A Capitol Blog
- As the Island Floats
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- Latinos for Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Burnt Orange Reporters
Publisher - Karl-Thomas M.
Editor-in-Chief - Matt G.
Staff Writer - David M.
Staff Writer - Katherine H.
Staff Writer - Michael H.
Staff Writer - Todd H.
Man of Mystery - Phillip M.
Founder - Byron L.

Powered by: SoapBlox