Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond
Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Follow Burnt Orange Report on Twitter (@BOR) and Facebook.

Michael McCaul Distorts Truth, Continues to Oppose Real Health Reform for Texans


by: Katherine Haenschen

Thu Nov 05, 2009 at 00:00 PM CST


Republican Rep. Michael McCaul is working hard in D.C. to make sure that Texans in the 10th District receive no meaningful health reform. With efforts to block President Obama's proposals at every turn, the unremarkable incumbent has now taken to touting bogus polls and whining about not being included in the process. And what does McCaul have to show for it? A Republican bill that will leave 17 million Americans uninsured, and won't cut the deficit nearly as well as the Democratic bill.

Last week, Michael McCaul went on KVUE to complain about health insurance reform, touting an oh-so-scientific poll from his own website. From KVUE, October 31, 2009:

"In my view, the majority of the American people don't support [the Democratic health reform plan]. Certainly in my district, on my website I have a poll, and it's about 85% against this, it's what's called the public option, the government-run option, the government takeover of our healthcare, it's one sixth of our economy."

Michael McCaul is wrong about health reform. In August, 77% of Americans supported the public option, according to a SUSA poll. That's even higher than it was in June. According to an ABC News poll conducted last week more Americans prefer the Democrats' public option than a watered-down, bipartisan compromise.

McCaul continues on with a series of bogus Republican buzz-words against health reform: "government-run takeover," "getting in between you and your doctor" and "health czar!" Funny, last time I checked, the only person coming between me and my doctor was some insurance company bureaucrat trying to decide if I really need that M.R.I., or visit to a specialist, or blood test, or not. And what's with their czar fetish?

To provide justification for his position, McCaul sites a bogus poll conducted on his website. (How does he know the folks voting on his website are only constituents? Hmm?) On his Facebook Feed, McCaul also published the results of another bogus poll conducted during his own tele-town hall, with 65% opposed to the public option.

Whaaat? You mean to say the small sample of folks who bother to visit his website or join a tele-town hall happen to overwhelmingly agree with his views on the public option?! What's extra irritating here is how the newscaster just takes the bogus statistic as God-given fact. Then she has the gall to suggest that health reform is actually moving too fast. As anyone who has actually been following the legislative process can tell you, things are definitely NOT moving too fast, especially for the 9.3 million Texans who were uninsured for all or part of last year.

Then, just this week, McCaul continued whining in a call-in press conference that Obama and the Democrats have "left out" the Republicans in the health reform process. This is disingenuous, for three reasons.

First, the Republican bill championed by McCaul is widely considered to be a dismal failure. From Ezra Klein:

In 2019, after 10 years of the Republican plan, CBO estimates that ...17 percent of legal, non-elderly residents won't have health-care insurance. The Republican alternative will have helped 3 million people secure coverage, which is barely keeping up with population growth. Compare that to the Democratic bill, which covers 36 million more people and cuts the uninsured population to 4 percent.

According to CBO, the GOP's alternative will shave $68 billion off the deficit in the next 10 years. The Democrats, CBO says, will slice $104 billion off the deficit. ... The Democratic bill, in other words, covers 12 times as many people and saves $36 billion more than the Republican plan.

McCaul describes the Republican bill as better, because it "incentivizes the free market and the private sector to provide coverage." Except that's the same idea that has failed Americans since World War II. It's no change in policy, and it will do very little to change the rate of uninsured Texans.

Second, Republicans--teabaggers and members of Congress alike--are deliberately trying to obstruct the reform process for ideological and political gain. They spent all summer yelling about death panels and insuring undocumented immigrants and shouting "YOU LIE!" during joint sessions of Congress. Republicans are too busy trying to prevent meaningful reform and coverage that will extend to all Americans, in order to support their buddies in the insurance industry. All they want is for President Obama's plans to fail--they don't care about meaningful reform, they only care about their own electoral prospects in 2010 and beyond.

Third, while McCaul complains about not having a seat at the table, he made it nearly impossible for his own constituents to share their views on health reform. He complains that the Democratic bill was written "behind closed doors in Washington," despite the many open town-halls held by Democratic Representatives and constant stream of news coverage about every single step of the process and constant updates from Democratic Congressional leaders.

Meanwhile, it's McCaul who is largely operating behind closed doors, having private meetings with folks who seem to unanimously oppose reform. According to his website, McCaul held only one in-person town hall, at 9:00 a.m. on a Friday, in Katy, the day before Labor Day weekend. He waited until the final day of the Congressional District working period to solicit real input from his constituents. It was only posted to his campaign website three days before the event. Sounds as if Rep. McCaul doesn't want to hear what his constituents have to say. In a district that spans 150 miles from Austin to Houston, he holds only one event, off in one of the most Republican parts of the district. There sure was no event in Travis County, because if there was, McCaul would have heard an earful from his constituents who are tired of losing coverage for pre-existing conditions, being dropped from their plans, and watching premiums rise as access to quality care drops.

To conclude, let's sum up the many ways in which Michael McCaul is wrong about health reform:

  • Elections have consequences. Barack Obama won, and Democrats have significant majorities in the House and Senate. Democrats are supposed to set national policy. That's what people voted for. (N.B.: Olympia Snowe is not a Democrat and should not be setting health care policy.)
  • If Republicans want a seat at the table they need to offer real solutions backed by their party, not just vitriol and obstruction. A bill that leaves 17 million people uninsured and doesn't cut costs as well as the Democratic bill is not a real solution.
  • Congresspeople can't conduct bogus polls on their websites and conference calls and tout it as scientific fact. Anyone who actually has a say in our nation's education funding should know better. The thought makes me shudder.
  • Michael McCaul is yet another out-of-touch Republican in Congress working hard to prevent the people of the 10th Congressional district from having access to quality, affordable health care. He needs to go.
ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
McCaul is right and so is Joe Wilson (0.00 / 0)
BO said no Federal funds for abortion and you can keep your private health care.  Pelosi bill says different.  As simple as that.  

Forgot to mention why McCaul is right. (3.00 / 1)
You blame him for considering a poll of his constituents?  The House of Reps is the peoples house.  McCaul represents his district not the US at large . . .  ONLY those in his district.  I can guarantee you a super majority of those constituents do not want THIS health care bill.  The real turncoats are the Democrats that represent districts that are against this bill but will vote for it because Pelosi or Rohn are threatening them.  By the way they will vote for it solely to keep their job.

You can think what ever you want about McCaul but he represents his constituents.


The Source? (0.00 / 0)
" a super majority of those constituents do not want THIS health care bill."  The source is the Congressman.  

[ Parent ]
EXACTLY! (0.00 / 0)
The source is the Congressman as he listens to his constituents.  Those who call, fax, email, those who take part in electronic and live town halls. He is listening.

 


[ Parent ]
Who wants Healthcare Reform + a Tax Increase??? (0.00 / 0)
I sure don't.

First, I'm not sure anyone will tell you that they agree with the Democratic plan to cut more of the deficit by taxing the hell ($729.5 Billion in Tax Increases) out of families and small businesses while also including $170 Billion in Medicare Advantage Cuts.

I know what you're thinking, these cuts to the deficit look really tempting...but don't buy in just yet. Ask this question, How sustainable is this??? I see no part of this bill that ensures that the government will actually proceed with these cuts. However, I do see a Republican alternative that doesn't include any cuts to Medicare and includes FAR LESS Taxing. (SOLD ME HERE).

Second, in regards to the website polls that our Congressman so graciously entertains on his website: Have you ever actually voiced your opinion in one? If so, you would see that you must include an address in Congressional District 10 to participate. Also, if you understood a bit about the tele-town halls you would realize that they are done randomly in congressional districts and do not target supporters...so these are all a great cross section of McCaul's Congressional District.

To conclude, I am so glad to see that you've posted links to Congressman McCaul's KVUE Interview & his Facebook Page so that his constituents and your readers are able to easily access and see the great work that our Congressman does for us in Washington.


I wonder if McCaul (3.00 / 1)
knows that 127 of his constituents have died because they either do not have health care insurance or they were denied care.

Does he care?

I seriously doubt it.  Texas Republicans are too busy protecting the profits of their sugar daddies in the health insurance industry.  

http://www.texaskaos.com/diary...


Great ground work (0.00 / 0)
It must have taken countless hours to investigate all the deaths in each of the districts you list and figure out which ones were due to lack of insurance.  I know one thing for sure, if I stop purchasing insurance I'm moving to a district that votes democrat because they apparently have zero deaths.  

By the way are the formulas you used to create these figures similar to those used to calculate how many jobs are created or saved by the stimulus?  

I admit I am not that intelligent but the little that I do have is insulted.


[ Parent ]
Surprising results of Culbertson's poll on health care reform (3.00 / 1)
Recently, Congressman John Culbertson ran a poll on health care reform on his website, but the results didn't exactly turn out the way he wanted.

Here is the exact wording of the poll as it appeared on Culbertson's website:

After passing cap and trade legislation, which is the largest tax increase in American history, President Obama and the liberals in congress are now pushing a 1.5 trillion health care plan that will raise taxes, ration care, and let government bureaucrats make decisions that should be made by you and your doctors. The White House has said this health care reform is "key to our fiscal future". I think every American would agree that more taxes, more intervention, and more intervention is not the answer.

View the health care legislation proposed by the Democrats, and then vote on HR3200.


(The choices were " for" , "against" and "indifferent".)

The results?
77% for
27% against
1% indifferent

Given the outrageous partisan language of the poll, which uses every Republican talking point he could cram into it, the results are startling. Culbertson's constituents favor the Democratic plan, with a public option. Is he listening?

Note: as of today, the results of the poll have disappeared from Culbertson's website.



I live in Culberson's district (3.00 / 2)
unfortunately for me b/c he does not represent me or any Democrat and progressive constituents.  He is against everything we are for.  He votes against us 100% of the time.

The district is comprised of very conservative pockets and very progressive ones.  It also has a large number of gay/lesbian households, young urban professionals, medical, graduate and college students.  Demographics are changing district 7 to more of a purple than red.  

A friend of mine who attended his town hall meeting this summer (a Democrat) said it was so awful that she left in tears.  Apparently Culberson made sure a lot of teabaggers were there.  I missed the town hall b/c I was out of town.

If Culberson is appealing to only the teabaggers in the district, it is only a question of time b/f we can get rid of him.

Republicans in Houston ought to wake up and smell the coffee.   A gay woman and an African American are in a tight run off race for the city's mayor.  The old white guy with boatloads of bucks lost.  


[ Parent ]
Votes 100% of the time against public education (0.00 / 0)
I used to teach in Spring Branch, and was active in NEA. He votes 100% of the time against public education.

I think you are right about the changing demographics- a number of young professionals are moving into the part of Spring Branch north of I-10, and Kristi Thibaut won her state rep race which includes the northwestern part of Spring Branch.   Culbertson's district includes not only very conservative places like  Hunter's Creek and Bunker Hill, but also part of Montrose, Meyerland, and West University, which elected Ellen Cohen to the Texas legislature.  


[ Parent ]
Burnt Orange Reader

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Poll
Who would you vote for in the Democratic Primary for Ag Commission?
Kinky Friedman
Hank Gilbert

Results

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- A Capitol Blog
- As the Island Floats
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- Latinos for Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Burnt Orange Reporters
Publisher - Karl-Thomas M.
Editor-in-Chief - Matt G.
Staff Writer - David M.
Staff Writer - Katherine H.
Staff Writer - Michael H.
Staff Writer - Todd H.
Man of Mystery - Phillip M.
Founder - Byron L.

Powered by: SoapBlox