Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond
Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Follow Burnt Orange Report on Twitter (@BOR) and Facebook.

Support The Public Option, Support Progressives Who Took The Pledge


by: Katherine Haenschen

Tue Aug 18, 2009 at 04:13 PM CDT


Without a public option--without every American having the choice to buy their own affordable health insurance--we won't succeed at truly reforming insurance in this country. While angry conservatives rail against giving regular Americans access to insurance, a group of progressive Congresspeople has been holding the line on progressive reform, refusing to vote for any plan that doesn't include a strong public option.

Today, Blue America PAC launched an ActBlue fundraising page for the progressives in Congress making sure that all Americans get real health care reform. Called They Took The Pledge, the page lists the members of Congress who are committed to preserving a public option.

Now, it's time to stand with them them, and encourage other Congresspeople to get on board as well. As the fundraising page states:

Democratic members of Congress need to understand that a healthcare reform bill with a Public Option is simply not an option--it's a requirement. The congressmembers on this list have said in no uncertain terms that they will not vote for a bill without a public option all the way through Conference. That takes courage, and we need to show them how much we appreciate them for doing so.

The efforts are already attracting attention from the national media, who are catching on to the fact that the Town-Hall Shriekers don't represent the vast majority of Americans who want and need health insurance reform. Money talks, and while progressive activists don't have the buying power of Blue Cross or United, we can show our support for the Congresspeople who hold strong to our values. The ActBlue page has already raised $47,000 $49,000 $51,000 so far today (seriously, they raised over $4K while I wrote this post), and the higher it goes, the more the national media will listen to our calls for real insurance reform.

These are our progressive champions in the House, the Congresspeople who stand up for the little guy and gal as a matter of course. Now, it's time to stand with them.

Here in Texas, we're lucky to have three such Representatives on the list: Lloyd Doggett (TX-25), Sheila Jackson Lee (TX-18), and Eddie Bernice Johnson (TX-30). It shouldn't escape your notice that these three represent the urban areas of Austin, Houston, and South Dallas, respectively. Their districts contain huge numbers of uninsured residents -- all higher than the national average of 15%.

Austin is 20% uninsured.
Houston is 28% uninsured.
Dallas is 24% uninsured.

Their residents so desperately need this reform, and we need to stand with them to make sure that all Texans have access to affordable health care.

The list is pretty broad, and contains folks from states like Florida and Kentucky, and Netroots candidates including Donna Edwards and Eric Massa. So, go drop some coin into the ActBlue page. You know, while some of folks may be safe in 2010, it's still important to put our dollars where our values are.  

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
We should be asking our candidates already in the races about this issue! (0.00 / 0)
I know for a fact there are several candidates in the races around Texas for Congress that need to step forward on this issue. It needs to be reiterated so we know where they stand and we know they're the best to be put forward by the party in the primaries. I applaud our already-elected members of Congress for doing so (including my once and future Congressman, Lloyd Doggett), but where are all the Democratic Congress Candidates?  

what people really want from health reform (0.00 / 0)
The chairman of Harris Interactive (a polling firm) put together a summary of what recent polls tell us about public opinion on health reform.

http://www.thehealthcareblog.c...

I'd like to see a public option, but I don't think it is politically realistic. Here's what Nate Silver thinks (caveat - I take issue with his policy conclusions):

http://www.fivethirtyeight.com...


Politically realistic? (0.00 / 0)
Did you not read Phillip's link to this post today.  Look to the top right sidebar, the BOR Reader.

Do you think the government should stay out of
Medicare? If yes, press 1. If no, press 2. If
you're not sure, press 3.

Yes ...... 39%
No ....... 46%
Not Sure.. 15%

People are really confused. And the misinformation coming from the right is contributing 100% to that. I'm not sure what your point is, either. The Nate Silver piece is from 3 days ago. Long time ago in this changing discussion.

It's August. The insurance industry lobbyists (Dick Armey) knew exactly what they were doing...but it's not going to work.


[ Parent ]
Can you point me to other information? (0.00 / 0)
The article you cite mentions Armey has worked with the life insurance industry but not the health insurance industry. The only thing I've seen the health insurance industry oppose about reform is the public option. Otherwise they've expressed support for reform. In fact, they said a few months back that they would support a number of industry reforms (like guaranteed coverage, etc) - it was likely just trying to work with the inevitable and perhaps try to head off public option...but still, I am not aware that they oppose any of that. However, I know I don't catch everything out there, so if you can point me to sources that suggest otherwise, I would certainly be interested.

The Harris Poll guy was summarizing results of numerous polls. The one Philip cited (which I had not seen previously, thanks) doesn't seem particularly inconsistent with the summary. I agree there is confusion. Some of it is obviously due to people hoping to cause confusion about what's in the current proposals - but even before the current brouhaha, polling showed lack of knowledge about the system, and split opinion about how the system should be reformed.

Nate Silver's analysis is from the 16th, but I haven't seen any indication that the picture has changed. Again, if you are seeing things I've missed, I would be glad to be directed to additional information.


[ Parent ]
Democrats Readying to "Go It Alone" (0.00 / 0)
Today.

Rahm Emanuel, the White House chief of staff, said the heated opposition was evidence that Republicans had made a political calculation to draw a line against any health care changes, the latest in a string of major administration proposals that Republicans have opposed.

"The Republican leadership," Mr. Emanuel said, "has made a strategic decision that defeating President Obama's health care proposal is more important for their political goals than solving the health insurance problems that Americans face every day."

The Democratic shift may not make producing a final bill much easier. The party must still reconcile the views of moderate and conservative Democrats worried about the cost and scope of the legislation with those of more liberal lawmakers determined to win a government-run insurance option to compete with private insurers.

On the other hand, such a change could alter the dynamic of talks surrounding health care legislation, and even change the substance of a final bill. With no need to negotiate with Republicans, Democrats might be better able to move more quickly, relying on their large majorities in both houses. [emphasis added.]



[ Parent ]
Thanks (0.00 / 0)
I don't read it as saying public option is a done deal - the bit about reconciling views of moderate and conservative Ds suggests it isn't. But who knows. Silver says 43-45 Senate Dems for public option, and that under certain scenarios it might get enough votes to pass. Everything I've read leads me to believe this is likely an issue that will get resolved in conference - if public option comes out of conference, my guess would be it would pass in both House and Senate but I don't think it is a certainty.

[ Parent ]
Ongoing Discussion (0.00 / 0)
The belief that the public option is "dead," is simply the media making sweeping pronouncements. All the effort the right has put into disrupting these town halls...they have to believe they've "won." It's all they've got.  

[ Parent ]
Eddie Bernice Johnson, TX-30 (0.00 / 0)
I love her. She was absolutely brilliant this past Sunday on CNN.

"It would be very, very difficult," to support a bill that lacked a public health insurance option, Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson said Sunday on CNN's State of the Union, "because, without the public option, we'll have the same number of people uninsured. If the insurance companies wanted to insure these people now, they'd be insured.

Johnson added that "an option that would give the private insurance companies a little competition" is "the only way" to be sure that insurance is available to low income people and people without employer-provided coverage. [emphasis added.]

I contributed to her on her ActBlue page today, too ~ "Standing up for the Public Option."  Thank you for the link, Katherine.  

Wow! Well on the way to $250,000!  


Burnt Orange Reader

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Poll
Who would you vote for in the Democratic Primary for Ag Commission?
Kinky Friedman
Hank Gilbert

Results

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- A Capitol Blog
- As the Island Floats
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- Latinos for Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Burnt Orange Reporters
Publisher - Karl-Thomas M.
Editor-in-Chief - Matt G.
Staff Writer - David M.
Staff Writer - Katherine H.
Staff Writer - Michael H.
Staff Writer - Todd H.
Man of Mystery - Phillip M.
Founder - Byron L.

Powered by: SoapBlox