.
Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond
Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Follow Burnt Orange Report on Twitter (@BOR) and Facebook.

Pinocchio Joe Games the System


by: Matt Glazer

Tue May 26, 2009 at 06:33 PM CDT


Because there are valid points of order on the Voter I.D. proposal, Democrats early on ask Speaker Joe Strauss if he would sustain one of them -- the fact that committee minutes for the bill were not filed within the three day deadline. He said the violation of the rule would make a bill ineligible for consideration.

Later, Straus indicated he might have, uh, misunderstood the question.

If it was a misunderstanding, it is a misunderstanding that cost the House several days work. Because if Straus had stuck with his original statement, Voter I.D. could have been called up, dispensed with on a point of order, and the House could have gone on to work on insurance reform and other issues.

But Straus and Republicans don't want to bring those bills up. It's clear they've gamed the calendar and the process to help their friends in the insurance industry, as well as Gov. Rick Perry who says he doesn't want to accept federal stimulus money for unemployment compensation -- another bill behind voter I.D. on the calendar.

Pinocchio Joe. The people's foe.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
a career line? (3.00 / 1)
Matt, your communications future may have just received a boost with that last sentence.

Come on now (0.00 / 0)
The point of order was weak and the Speaker was well within his discretion to overrule it.  

Really? (0.00 / 0)
I suppose that's why when it was posed to him by Jim Dunham in the hypothetical he said it would be a good point of order until he realized it was about voter ID.  Then he had to go learn his story?  Pinocchio Joe, indeed.  

[ Parent ]
Corrected minutes (0.00 / 0)
Has a point of order ever been sustained regarding corrected minutes? Apparently not, according to both Dunnam and Straus. If the rules are not clear and there has never been a ruling one way or the other, then the Chair is going to be given a lot of discretion on how he rules.


[ Parent ]
according to the memo (0.00 / 0)
there were at least 3 points on that bill - and the Speaker never overruled anything.  He did let a small faction of conservatives overrule the will of the House and refuse to take up important state priorities.

And remember - those members that blocked the House from taking bills out of order didn't just sacrifice unemployment insurance, insurance reform, tax cuts for veterans, etc - they blocked the House from taking up bills like ultrasounds before abortions.  Voter ID was more important to them than pro-life issues.  It shows the extent to which extreme partisans were willing to go to get Voter ID - they chose voter suppression over the sanctity of life.


[ Parent ]
wow (0.00 / 0)
How about some basic fact checking guys before you hit send on your diatribes: the UI bill was ahead of Voter ID on the calendar.

Didn't say it wasn't (0.00 / 0)
What I said was, if "Straus had stuck with his original statement, Voter I.D. could have been called up, dispensed with on a point of order, and the House could have gone on to work on insurance reform and other issues."

There are procedural actions that allow bills to be taken out of order and dealt with.  

If there was a sustainable point of order, then the bill could be taken out of order on the calendar by a 2/3rd vote and then removed from the calendar.  If that had been done, I am sure the calendar would have moved much faster.  The other thing that could have been done is Speaker Straus could have removed SB362 from the calendar.  

Instead, Democrats had to use process to protect voter's rights.

Hopefully this clarifies the specifics of the post.


[ Parent ]
Nope (0.00 / 0)
What you said was:
"It's clear they've gamed the calendar and the process to help their friends in the insurance industry, as well as Gov. Rick Perry who says he doesn't want to accept federal stimulus money for unemployment compensation -- another bill behind voter I.D. on the calendar."

SB 1569 - the unemployment insurance bill was set before the voter ID bill.  It got postponed by Strama and was then after the Local and Consent Calendar.  At no point was it ever behind voter ID.


[ Parent ]
Burnt Orange Reader

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Poll
Who do you support in the Houston Mayoral Run-off?
Annise Parker
Gene Locke

Results

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- A Capitol Blog
- As the Island Floats
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- Latinos for Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Burnt Orange Reporters
Publisher - Karl-Thomas M.
Editor-in-Chief - Matt G.
Staff Writer - David M.
Staff Writer - Katherine H.
Staff Writer - Michael H.
Staff Writer - Todd H.
Guest Writer - Vince L.
Founder - Byron L.

Powered by: SoapBlox