.
Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond
Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Follow Burnt Orange Report on Twitter (@BOR) and Facebook.

Voters to Texas Democrats: "Stand By Your Principles"


by: Matt Glazer

Tue May 26, 2009 at 04:00 PM CDT


Today, Representative Richard Raymond fully enunciated what the debate over voter suppression is about. Rep. Raymond made it clear that his stand, along with other Democrats in the House, is about principal and a greater good.

Texas Democrats have stood up in fights like this before.

In 2003, Tom DeLay, Tom Craddick, Rick Perry, Karl Rove and others fought for mid-decade redistricting to redraw congressional districts.  

Democrats stood opposed to this plan because it disenfranchised hundreds of thousands of voters.  

Of course, the Republican Party either didn't care or didn't believe the argument.  

Democrats had no choice.  Nearly every Democrat joined together and broke quorum to head to Ardmore Oklahoma.  Republicans called Democrats names.  They said Democrats would pay for this in the election.  They said voters wouldn't care and they said the plan was fair and legitimate.

Republican's eventually succeeded in getting their Republican maps.  They disenfranchised hundreds of thousands of Texans. The Supreme Court ended up getting involved in this debate.  Nearly 3 years later, the Supreme Court ruled the Republican drawn map was unconstitutional.  In United States Supreme Court in League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, the Supreme Court upheld a state could redistrict between censuses, but struck down Congressional District 23 as racial gerrymandering in violation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.

Democrats were proven right.

Not only did the court agree with the 52 Democrats who went to Oklahoma but Democrats have made substantial gains in the Texas House since protect your right to vote.  Since 2004, Democrats have gone from less than 60 Democrats in the House to 74.

Of the 52 Democrats who went to Ardmore, only one appears to have lost a general election. That one was John P. Mabry, Jr. (Waco) who lost to Charles "Doc" Anderson in a heavily Republican district.

As one friend concisely stated, since 2004, only one non-freshman Democrat has lost in November. All in all, I'd say that's a record to be proud of.

I agree with them.

When Richard Raymond spoke passionately today about why he stands opposed to the Republican backed voter suppression legislation, he can stand knowing history is on his side.  Richard Raymond and all of the Democrats working to protect your right to vote can know, Texans stand behind them in the only poll that matters.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I think you mean (0.00 / 0)
.."Principles"  

Thanks (0.00 / 0)
KT wrote the title because I couldn't be original.  Thanks for the catch.

[ Parent ]
oh sure blame it on me (0.00 / 0)
Who's to say that Texas Democrats shouldn't stand by our state' principals! We are pro-education as well aren't we?

Please read the Community Guidelines and How to Rate Comments.

[ Parent ]
principal and a greater good (0.00 / 0)
Well, at least try to catch it everywhere.

Anyway, Raymond is a bit opportunistic known for putting himself in the spotlight likely for future political gain.


[ Parent ]
future political gain? (0.00 / 0)
How, Raymond has just made himself a bigger target for Republican party hacks. I think he was taking a principled stand rather than just pandering to Democratic primary voters. During the opening session of 2007, Raymond was the only member who rose to ask fellow members to vote against Craddick, even though he had no opponent

I have known Richard for quite sometime. He is quite capable of saddling up and riding toward the political gunfire for all the right reasons. Raymond took one for the team when he ran for the open Land Commissioner office in 1998 against Dewhurst, giving up his safe seat in the Texas House.

I expect Raymond to either run for Congress or state-wide again. Texas Democrats would have the real thing with him representing them.



[ Parent ]
It's a little harder now (0.00 / 0)
In 2003 we were down to 62 Democrats in the House. We had already lost most of the swing districts, meaning that the remaining Democrats were mostly in safe districts and could afford to go to Ardmore. We needed 51 to break the quorum, and we got 52. I applaud every Dem who went to Ardmore, but there were only a handful, like John Mabry and Patrick Rose, who took big risks in doing so. Thankfully, all but Mabry survived.

Now we're up to 74 seats, many from swing or Republican-leaning districts, and we need almost all of them (plus a few Republicans) to stop Voter ID if it comes up to a vote. That's a tough assignment.

Which is why we need parliamentary tricks like chubbing.


It's a not a trick (0.00 / 0)
It's within the bounds of the rules that every house member but 1 voted to approve.  

Please read the Community Guidelines and How to Rate Comments.

[ Parent ]
There's nothing wrong with it, (0.00 / 0)
but it's still a trick. Just like breaking a quorum is a trick. Just like filibustering is a trick. Just like budget reconciliation is a trick. And just like carving an exception to the 2/3 rule for voter ID was a trick. They're all legal, but they're all desperation measures for when you don't have the votes to win the usual way.

These tricks often work, and you'd be a fool to never use them, but they make you look bad and they set you up for retaliation. Then, when both sides are unloading all their tricks, the whole system breaks down. That's what happened this session, with the R's power play in the Senate being paid back with Democratic chubbing in the House.

Anyway, I sure hope that the chubbing works, or that the point of order trick works, because there's no point in our paying the price if we're not going to win.  


[ Parent ]
no no no no no (3.00 / 2)
there is a process under the dome (despite many appearances to the contrary). that process is specifically designed so that each bill is afforded as much daylight as the body feels it needs.

is extending debate a trick? is closing debate a trick? is vote verification a trick? is parliamentary procedure a trick?

totally disagree on how they make you "look". this caucus is doing everything they can to protect voting rights of seniors and minorities. that looks better than going prostrate for the majority.

we really didn't pay a price in 03...it energized our base and we won some tough swing races in 04. we won't pay the price here.

the repubs fought us like hell in the mid 90s and late 90s using every "trick" in the process and it didn't exact any toll on them at the poll.

i appreciate that anecdotally some folks are annoyed, but this chubbing talk is still such inside baseball that it doesn't have legs 15 months long.


[ Parent ]
Burnt Orange Reader

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Poll
Who do you support in the Houston Mayoral Run-off?
Annise Parker
Gene Locke

Results

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- A Capitol Blog
- As the Island Floats
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- Latinos for Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Burnt Orange Reporters
Publisher - Karl-Thomas M.
Editor-in-Chief - Matt G.
Staff Writer - David M.
Staff Writer - Katherine H.
Staff Writer - Michael H.
Staff Writer - Todd H.
Guest Writer - Vince L.
Founder - Byron L.

Powered by: SoapBlox