Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Evan Smith: "That's the way the game is played, Bubby."


by: Matt Glazer

Tue May 26, 2009 at 11:02 AM CDT


It was a holiday yesterday, so you might not have been paying full attention to the Texas legislature-- specifically the Texas House.

Voter ID has slowed the Texas House to a near crawl.  Republican's put the bill on the calendar and refuse to take the highly controversial bill off the general calendar.

Paul Burka criticized Democrats and since then, we have been making it a point to show the error of his logic. As Phil points to, this is Republican Joe Straus' House.  As Phil aptly points out, "Democrats can stand on principles while [Joe Straus] stand on politics."  

KT then made it a point to discuss who controls what part of the legislative process.  It looks a little like this:

Republicans control the Texas Senate.
Republicans control the Texas House.
Republicans set the calendar.
Republicans set the speaker.
Republicans set the agenda.

Now Evan Smith, President of Texas Monthly, has chimed in and agrees with us.

Had Craddick not be ousted, had they still hovered somewhere just south of 90 members, etc., etc. But the fact is, he was, and they don't. So it's up to the House Rs, not the House Ds, to get the train back on track. They're the ones who have to get the Ds to compromise, because unless they do, the Ds can use, in the Speaker's parlance, the process that's available to them.

Smith even quotes the Speaker himself from the Quorum Report.

"Democrats have been using the process that's available to them to use in a way that I wouldn't suggest is helpful," he said in an impromptu gaggle with the press during floor discussion of the Top 10 Percent Rule debate. "I would say the more they talk, the more explaining they have to do and I feel like the entire Republican caucus agrees with me on that. And I just hope they put aside some of this, some of the abuses of the process - legitimate - but I think ill-timed beyond just making their point."

Smith finally boils down the debate to the simplest point.

As for the explaining to be done, I would say it falls to those people who are so hell-bent on passing voter ID ahead of windstorm, insurance sunset, and other bills that pass the test of pressing need.

This is a complicated issue.  Republicans control every branch of government in Texas. The far right wants voter suppression legislation over any other bill.  They have made that decision... not democrats.

We have 1 day left to get to work on the people's business.  It is only up to the Republican's in the House to get that done.  They are the ones in power after all.  

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

In all fairness... (0.00 / 0)
"The far right wants voter suppression legislation over any other bill."

Yes, the Rs have made that bill their top priority. But in all fairness, Ds have also made that bill their top priority (just blocking rather than passing it). So both sides have chosen to sacrifice other legislation vis-a-vis that bill. All it takes to start passing other bills is for one side to give on that bill, and it could be the Ds as well as the Rs.

For either side to claim the other is solely responsible for this state of affairs is rather disingenuous.


False equivalency (0.00 / 0)
Because it makes suppressing voter rights-which is what the Republican bill is about-a little technicality that if Ds would just concede would make all those other things accomplishable.

Here's the real story, to quote my comment on Evan's blog entry:

Q: What do these things have in common? windstorm insurance, solar, energy efficiency & air quality, texdotsunset, unemployment

A: They are all less important to Texas Republicans than their precious voter suppression bill.



Before you win, you have to fight. Come fight along with us at TexasKaos.

[ Parent ]
Process v policy (0.00 / 0)
There's a process issue and a policy issue. The process issue applies to both parties equally - if one gives, other bills can be heard. Bringing in what the does shifts it to an argument over policy. The assertion that it is all the Rs fault other bills are not being heard is about process, and is inaccurate. Smith's last statement, which you bolded, could just as easily read 'They are all less important to Texas Ds than stopping the voter suppression bill" -- which is accurate.

I don't support the bill, and don't have a problem with the Ds chubbing other bills to death to block it. I just don't like the way this argument is being made - both sides have to participate in this process for it to continue, and you don't change that fact just because you happen to agree with one side's policy rationale. The appropriate response is not to say the Ds are not part of the reason other bills will die, but to make the case for why stopping this bill is a higher priority than the other bills that won't make it as a result of the stalemate.  


[ Parent ]
Hardly (0.00 / 0)
From the beginning of the session, the Republicans have prioritized voter supression.  Now they are willing to sacrifice highly important legislation to keep it on track. Blaming Democrats seems disingenuous.

Whatever happened to the procedural errors? (0.00 / 0)
A couple of days ago, there was a big story in BOR on how the time-stamps on the minutes from the committee hearing on Voter ID showed that the minutes were late, invalidating the whole law. Since then, all we've heard about is chumming.

Was the time-stamp card played unsuccessfully? What happened?  


Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On Tumblr: BOR
On Pinterest:
Rick Perry's Rental Mansion

Need A Vendor?
Check out BOR's Progressive Vendor Page for campaigns and non-profits.


Texas Blue Pages

Texas Blue Pages
A career network for progressives.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Burnt Orange Reporters
Publisher: Karl-Thomas M.
Editor-in-Chief: Katherine H.
Contributor: Phillip M.
Senior Writer: Michael H.
Staff Writer: Ben S.
Staff Writer: Chaille J.
Staff Writer: Edward G.
Staff Writer: Emily C.
Staff Writer: Joe D.
Staff Writer: Nick H.
Staff Writer: Shelby A.
Founder: Byron L.

Read staff bios here.

Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox