Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Lee Leffingwell Loans Campaign $58,837


by: David Mauro

Wed Apr 08, 2009 at 04:59 PM CDT


Lee Leffingwell, candidate for Mayor of Austin, has loaned his campaign $58,837, the Austin American-Statesman reports. After a previous loan of $41,163 on January 16, that brings Leffingwell's total loans to $100,000.

His campaign says Leffingwell always planned to loan at least this much to the campaign. Personal campaign loans are not unusual in Austin Mayoral campaigns, either. In fact, current Mayor Will Wynn loaned himself $90,000.

As the Statsman points out, given the $350 per person limits and the state of the economy, raising money for city races is not easy. While the strict contribution limits had good intentions, they clearly are hurting voter turnout in Austin Municipal elections.

Many have predicted that this year's elecion will have a turnout of about 13 percent. That is significantly lower than the 26 percent turnout we had in the 1994 Mayoral election (Bruce Todd and Daryl Slusher), the 23 percent turnout in 1991 (Bruce Todd and Robert Barnstone), and the 17 percent in 1997 (Kirk Watson and Ronney Reynolds).

Of course, all three of those elections were before the contribution limits made it difficult to wage an aggressive campaign in a city of Austin's size, especially without a candidate dipping into their own pocket.

In the coming years, it would be nice to see a conversation begin about raising the contribution limits to try to raise turnout in city elections and ensure that candidates do not have to loan their campaigns money to run aggressive races.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
campaign reform is for the birds (0.00 / 0)
here! here!  me and the rest of my developer buddies would LOVE to openly give more to our candidate.  vote for brewster!

Pettiness is for the birds (0.00 / 0)
JoJo-

That is a tired verse.

Brewster and Lee are both going to come out with a list of contributors that include (GASP!) developers, attorneys, title company people, accountants, gays, lesbians, Hispanics, African-Americans, Asian-Americans, Democrats, Republicans, independents, men, women, runners, joggers, walkers, bikers, swimmers, and artists.

Lee and Brewster each asked the same people for support and there is not a developer that Lee would have refused a donation from. In fact, Lee proudly lists the two most active lobbyists for developers as supporters.

Spare us the proportional moral relativism that Brewster may have MORE of some than others. They will both have supporters from Austin and elsewhere. They will both have a pile of money.

It is what they DO with that money that is meaningful. Will they both be positive? Let's hope so, even if some bloggers are not.


Contribution caps are not the problem (5.00 / 1)
I personally don't have a problem with the contribution caps, although I do think they could be a bit higher.  Maybe $500  

In my opinion, they serve their intended purpose of leveling the financial playing field for candidates and providing an avenue for citizens to show their support for the candidate of their choice without being shouted down by others who can afford a larger megaphone.

What I do have a problem with is that they've left a loophole in our campaign finance laws that you could drive a truck through.   Namely, being able to make massive donations to your own campaign.  This totally negates the spirit of the law and the parity sought by the caps, and gives those with large personal fortunes a distinct advantage over those without.

Pardon my whining, but I suspect that if the situations were reversed and Brewster was the one financing his own campaign, we'd never hear then end of it from the opposition.

Austin


Absolutely agreed (0.00 / 0)
The conventional wisdom among so many covering this race is that McCracken is the rich candidate favored by developers and Leffingwell is a comparatively middle-class public servant representing the people.

As with Laura Morrison and Cid Galindo, the facts don't support the narrative. Turns out the establishment-'progressive'(*) candidate is actually the richer one. (That's about the only way I'd group together Morrison and Leffingwell; I like him a heck of a lot more).

(* - trying to keep everything the same, or even roll it back to the way things used to be, is NOT progressive, hence the quotes).


very good point (5.00 / 1)
m1ek, if I recall correctly I think Cid ended up loaning his campaign more than twice what Laura loaned hers...

But your point, Upbeat Nihilist, is a very good one.  The way the system is now, truly middle class candidates have no chance against well-off ones.  Because my dad could in no way afford to loan his own campaign the vast amounts that Cid and Laura did, there was no possibility that we could compete in terms of message dissemination and voter contact.  I'm certainly not presuming we would have won had the warchests been equal, but we would have had a chance to let our message compete and really let the voters decide.

I don't harbor any hard feelings about having lost (well, hardly any :) ), but the basic, undemocratic unfairness of this is what really got to me.  I wonder if there's any chance we could get the council to close the loophole ...


True (0.00 / 0)
I forgot the loan amounts - but Morrison also had BATPAC to rely on, and her family wealth is quite considerable. She's most definitely NOT one of the little people, that's for sure (neither is Galindo, of course).

[ Parent ]
From 101X this morning (0.00 / 0)
McCracken pointed out that he has a considerably larger number of individual donors than do Leffingwell or Strayhorn. This also is inconvenient for the standard narrative being pushed here about who's representing the masses.

Good point (0.00 / 0)
McCracken's fundraising report was very impressive. Unfortunately, when there is expected turnout of 13%, no one can really claim to "represent the masses." This election will likely be decided by the same people who voted in last year's city election and the one before that. McCracken's greatest challenge is to expand the voter universe but it will not be easy. His fundraising, however, gives him a chance.

[ Parent ]
Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On the Go: Mobile App

Upcoming BOR Events

"Do I Look Illegal?"
Arizona GOP Debate Watch

Wednesday, February 22
6:00-9:00 p.m.
Angie's Restaurant
1307 E. 7th Street
RSVP on Facebook

Save The Date:
Super Tuesday Super Watch Party!
Tuesday, March 6
6:00-10:00 p.m.
Scholz Garten
1607 San Jacinto



Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Grading Texas
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox