Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


If Republicans OK a 4-Year Grace Period on Voter ID, How Is It An Emergency?


by: Phillip Martin, Progress Texas

Fri Mar 27, 2009 at 08:40 AM CDT


I somehow had missed this -- from an older article on voter ID by Gardner Selby of the Statesman, "Voter ID fights take new shape at Capitol" --

Possible sweeteners floated by Dewhurst include a two- to-four-year grace period before identification demands are enforced...

If this is such an urgent and immediate problem, why would Republicans be willing to wait four years to make it law? Try to somehow explain why they would be willing to offer a compromise if they truly believed this...

"Voter fraud is a very real threat to the legitimacy of our electoral system, and in a close election could very well compromise the results of what voters would rightly expect to be a fair and honest election." -- Republican State Senator Craig Estes (Source)

...or if they truly believed this...

""The voting system we have today is easy to cheat...To assume there is no voting fraud in Texas is laughable." -- Republican State Sentaor Troy Fraser (Source)

...or if they truly believed this...

Senator West: Is this more important than dealing with tuition deregulation?

Senator Williams: Senator West, I believe that it is. (Source)

Why on earth would anyone be so insistent on passing legislation that would not even take effect until 2012? Especially considering that there is such an incredible amount of evidence to suggest it's not necessary? Couldn't they commission a state-sponsored, bipartisan study and wait two years? They could still have plenty of time to pass the law and have it in place by 2012 -- or are they worried that a study would prove what everyone already knows: this is a solution in search of a problem, that voter impersonation is a non-issue, and that if we really want to curb voter fraud and improve the integrity of our elections, there are plenty of other policies out there that can do the trick.

Of course, maybe it has nothing to do with policy. Maybe it has to do with politics, as TX House Republican Elections Chair Todd Smith admitted in this story in the Statesman, "Voter ID measure set to head back to House" --

"I believe to the bottom of my heart, if I was putting on my partisan Republican hat, the best thing that could possibly happen would be for this legislation to be narrowly defeated, so Republican candidates could go into these marginal (could go either way) districts and blame Democrats for elections being less secure than they could be," Smith said.

Yup. There you have it. Republicans don't care about voter ID -- they're willing to delay it. Republicans just want a wedge issue they can use against Democrats. And you don't even have to take my liberal commie word for it:

I'm just repeating what Texas Republicans are saying.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
"Voter ID" -- A "Consolation" Rather Than A "Wedge" Issue (0.00 / 0)
"Voter ID" is now GOP litmus.

It mostly consoles demoralized GOP voters and scared GOP office-holders today. They cannot explain why they have to do it nor do they care much about the eventual effect, if any. But, grandstanding over hypothetical "voter fraud" helps them manage the grieving process and sustains the great dream of a "Permanent Republican Majority" in Texas -- the last refuge of the Confederacy!

To be sure, "Voter ID" was the next to last part of a plan that was mostly implemented explicitly under the Help America Vote Act and by hook-or-crook when Congress failed to pass the Total Information Awareness data-mining scheme but Bush/Cheney black ops folks got it done anyway. There are already multiple photo ID requirements throughout the Texas Election Code and our society generally.

The keystone in all of the Rove/Spakovsky plan was always a scheme called "Real ID" in the US and the "National Identity Card" in the UK. That was going to be a "Global War on Terror" boondoggle. But, today, it is just an "unfunded mandate" that the US Senate will neither expand nor kill -- little more than an "earmark" in the US. The UK version supported by Tony Blair was shot down by Gordon Brown even before he became Prime Minister.

Still, there is some reason for Democrats in Texas to be concerned: Governor Perry could use $300 MM in "stimulus" funding for education to implement "Real ID" in Texas as a "law enforcement" measure. That is probably what Lt. Governor Dewhurst has in mind by asserting an emergency now, to start ramping up "Real ID", but postponing "Voter ID" until DPS can implement "Real ID".

The GOP tends to have a plan. Texas Democrats tend to think in terms of a "case" or a "matter" and strive to achieve a "deal" -- often a deal for the sake of a deal.

We do not have an election integrity agenda of our own and, so, can deal ourselves right into a GOP trap.

If we had our own plan, we could use "Voter ID" and "Black Box" voting as a "wedge issue" against the GOP.

Here is why we do not:

First, the political participation rate in Travis County is rather high and things are hunky-dory relative to Polk County or Harris County. So, controversy over election technology and procedures pits (a) the TDP establishment against the Travis County Clerk over "emphasis voting", (b) Glen Maxey against the Tax Assessor-Collector over whatever, and (c) all of those against Vote Rescue over paper-ballots in a series of internecine disputes few elsewhere can fathom. How do you get a plan out of that? You don't.

Second, outside of Greater Austin in most of the rest of Texas, the perpetually incumbent office-holders from both parties have vested interests (a) in racial gerrymandering, (b) in low political participation rates, and (c) in collaboration rather than competition generally. So, neither party establishment nor the Texas Legislature has much interest in more than granstanding or tinkering with election law. Both parties are happy to punt such matters to the DoJ.

Third, political junkies and mercenaries, whether self-styled "progressives" or "conservatives" are "advocates" for this or that group or cause. Popular or patriotic matters that unite people across party or -- this is very important -- class lines are not very interesting to them, not nearly as interesting as manipulating jingo-religion or group-identity.

This makes Obama-style "post-partisan" appeals quite annoying for both of them and minimizes their appreciation of the civic foundations of republican democracy, including the strange appeal of the Second Amendment.

The left-junkies don't like the Second Amendment and the right-mercs have utterly perverted it. That is sad because the "right to keep and bear arms" for personal protection and collective security is necessary and sufficient to realizing universal suffrage as set forth in Art. VI of the Texas constitution.

It's a crying shame, too, because a "Second Amendment Right to Vote" could restore the popular heritage and progressive reputation of the Texas Democratic Party.

Instead, we have sanctimonious shadow-boxing over "Voter ID".    


The Second Amendment (0.00 / 0)
John, you never cease to fail me with how far you can take a point off the tracks.

Now, a very great man once said that some people rob you with a fountain pen.

[ Parent ]
Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On the Go: Mobile App

Upcoming BOR Events

"Do I Look Illegal?"
Arizona GOP Debate Watch

Wednesday, February 22
6:00-9:00 p.m.
Angie's Restaurant
1307 E. 7th Street
RSVP on Facebook

Save The Date:
Super Tuesday Super Watch Party!
Tuesday, March 6
6:00-10:00 p.m.
Scholz Garten
1607 San Jacinto



Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Grading Texas
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox