Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Austin City Council Votes for Nation's Largest Photovoltaic Array


by: citizen.sarah

Thu Mar 05, 2009 at 02:36 PM CST


(Sarah saved me the time and energy from writing my own post. Thanks! - promoted by Phillip Martin)

This afternoon the Austin City Council moved unanimously to approve Item 16 on the agenda, the purchasing power agreement with Gemini Solar Development Company to build a 30 MW solar plant at the Webberville tract.  That means that by the end of 2011, Austin should be the proud home of the nation's largest utility scale photovoltaic installation.  This is a tremendous milestone for both the City and Austin Energy that will set us up as a leader in solar energy, create jobs, attract industry, and protect our citizens from volatile future energy prices while curbing our global warming emissions.

Lee Leffingwell made the motion to approve item 16 with three additional recommendations.  The first direction was to include a provision that any federal stimulus funds, rebates, or incentives recovered would be passed on to Austin, rather than kept by Gemini.  The second was to create a new task force to review future energy projects.  The task force, he promised, would consist of diverse stakeholders and not be weighted in terms of energy usage.  This is an important point, as several representatives from the city's large scale industrial users such as Spansion and the Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) specifically requested that future stakeholder meetings be based upon the size of user consumption-- meaning that in future energy projects, city council dialogue would be dominated even more than ever by large industrials.  As David Power, Public Citizen's Deputy Director, testified, that sounds a little too much like, "for every dollar I spend, I get a vote."  Cheers to Lee Leffingwell for insisting on a more inclusive process.

The third and final additional direction was, as expected, to roll the power purchase agreement into Green Choice, so that citizens would be able to voluntarily opt into a program to buy solar power at a locked-in price. Councilman Mike Martinez stated that he would be more than happy to be the first person to sign up for such a program, except that Leffingwell already called "shotgun" on that distinction.

Council members Sheryl Cole, Laura Morrison, and Randi Shade all made additional comments in support of the plant, stating that this was a tough decision to make in hard economic times but that this solar plant, far from a luxury item, was an important element of Austin's long term energy goals.

The Austin City Council has earned Public Citizen's most heartfelt appreciation for proving itself, once again, a renewable energy leader.  We especially respect the time and effort that the Council and its staff put into this contentious process, and look forward to working with them on future projects.

We also encourage Austinites to express their thanks to the Mayor and City Council for approving this historic first step towards our renewable energy future.

Sarah McDonald is Public Citizen's Media Coordinator and blog lady. But that doesn't mean she's not her own person!

Original post can be found at www.texasvox.org

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
The political angle (0.00 / 0)
Besides being good for Austin, this vote makes both Leffingwell and McCracken look good, and undercuts the main negative argument each makes about the other.

McCracken's central argument is that he has a vision of making Austin a green-energy center, and that Leffingwell won't lead on this issue. By making the motion to approve the solar array, Leffingwell just led.

On the other hand, Leffingwell's argument is that McCracken is a lone wolf who can't work for consensus on the council the way that Leffingwell can. A unanimous vote on McCracken's key issue doesn't sound like a lone wolf.

McCracken backers can still say that Leffingwell followed and didn't lead, and Leffingwell backers can claim that it was Leffingwell, not McCracken, who swung the unanimous vote, but those criticisms will ring fairly hollow. Both men did right and both deserve credit for what they did.  


the call for a new task force is kind of odd... (0.00 / 0)
Both the Electric Utility Commission and the Resource Management Commission vet future energy projects (including this one).  Here is the mission of the EUC:


Review and analyze all policies and procedures of the electric utility including the electric rate structure, fuel costs and charges, customer services, capital investments, new generation facilities, selection of types of fuel, purchase of fuel, transportation of fuel, billing procedures, and the transfer of electric utility revenues from the utility fund to the general fund.

And for the Resource Management Commission:


Advise the city council in developing and reviewing city plans and programs in the area of alternative energy technologies, renewable energy sources and on energy and water conservation.

I'm interested to hear why the combination of these two commissions is not sufficient.  Do they not represent a broad range of stakeholders?


Sounds like a nice little project (0.00 / 0)
I've been an advocate of solar power since the 1970s, and Democratic leaders used to hate me and my allies for it.  The AFL-CIO leadership used to go crazy telling us how stupid we were.  

But objective observers can see that this project has more complications than you seem willing to admit.  A quarter of a billion dollars for a teeny little 30MW plant is a lot of money - especially given that it cannot deliver electricity 24 hours a day.  By comparison, the Matagorda nuclear power plant delivers up to 1300 MW; even at only 1000 MW, 34 solar plants of this size would be required to match it, which would mean $8.5 billion -- and that's if you could find the suppliers required to do the job.  Chances are, prices would rise to meet the demand.  

By one account this solar plant could supply only 5,000 homes.  I have not yet verified that claim, but it cannot be too far off the mark.  In a city of 800,000-plus people, this is more of a starter project - a demo project - than a serious production facility.  So while it is really cool that it is getting done, it is nothing to write home about.  For the folks who are responsible for delivering electricity to everyone, 24/7, this does almost nothing to relieve them of their burden; in many ways, it increases the burden.  But it really is cool, and some day we can hope for more, at more reasonable prices.


Da Man! (0.00 / 0)
B-mac also has a plan to harness the power of lightning and tornadoes. Austin will be the premier purveyors of shock-and-awe electricity generation during his second term.  Stand back peons and be amazed!

Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On the Go: Mobile App

Upcoming BOR Events

"Do I Look Illegal?"
Arizona GOP Debate Watch

Wednesday, February 22
6:00-9:00 p.m.
Angie's Restaurant
1307 E. 7th Street
RSVP on Facebook

Save The Date:
Super Tuesday Super Watch Party!
Tuesday, March 6
6:00-10:00 p.m.
Scholz Garten
1607 San Jacinto



Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Grading Texas
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox