Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


On Needing a Democratic Gubernatorial Candidate & Attacking Hutchison


by: Karl-Thomas Musselman

Mon Jan 26, 2009 at 10:00 AM CST


I know this seems really obvious, but let me just walk this though through. Let us suppose the following things are true.

  1. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison plans to run for Governor.

  2. Gov. Rick Perry is running for re-election.

  3. Sen. John Cornyn would rather KBH not resign anytime soon lest he lose another GOP Senator before 2010 where he already faces multiple retirements which are giving him headaches as NRSC chair. Also, losing a senate seat in Texas might dent his 2010 Presidential ambitions.

  4. Every Republican under the sun other than John Cornyn wants KBH to vacate so they can finally move up the GOP foodchain either by running for her Senate seat or other people's seats vacated in their run for her Senate seat.

We accept these things to be true. Here are some conventional outcomes.



Gubernatorial Outcome A: The Weak Democrats Self Fulfilling Outcome:

Kay Bailey Hutchison strikes fear into the hearts of Democratic candidates. Everyone believes her internal polling released 15 months before the primary that shows her beating Rick Perry. Democratic candidate fear having to go up against the woman who has slain other venerable Democrats like Barbara Ann Radnofsky, Gene Kelly, and Richard Fisher. As such, Democrats flee the Governor's race for the relative safety of Hutchison's Senate seat, not knowing when or even if it that door will open to them, recognizing that their ability to run for it is held entirely in the hands of Republicans that don't want them to win it. They leave the Democratic Gubernatorial primary open to the lesser candidates of little interest and off-cycle Democratic primary voters recognize this. These Democratic partisans, seeking their one chance to rid themselves of the hated "Good Hair Perry" abandon their pointless primary in droves to cross over and vote against Perry by way of Hutchison.

Senate Outcome A-1: By allowing the GOP primary electorate to expand beyond the base, with only Perry nipping at her heels from the right, she is successful in beating him in the primary. November of 2010 rolls around, and Hutchison is elected Governor in a mandate election, swapping out "Good Hair" with "Big Hair" from Dallas, giving the Texas GOP a new lease on life and delaying their eventual demographic demise.

Hutchison resigned at a time of her choosing to ensure the the Senate special election falls on the 2010 ballot. Facing little serious competition from Democrats in the gubernatorial general election, soon to be Governor Hutchison spreads her political capital across the ticket to help ensure turnout for the GOP, both in the general election and in the runoff. Democratic candidates who had fled the Governor's race for the Senate race suddenly feel like they are running against Hutchison anyways.

Senate Outcome A-2: Perry, being the skillful politician he really is, hangs on and defeats Hutchison in the primary. Just like in 2006, an unpopular Governor winds up getting re-elected in the general election because the Democrats didn't get their act together in the Governor's race.

Hutchison, convinced by Cornyn that the national GOP couldn't afford to lose her seat, didn't resign from the Senate during the primary (part of the reason she lost the primary unexpectedly). This is good news for her since she still has her job, but bad news for the Democrats. Not only have they mistakenly let the Governorship slip through their fingers in lieu of an open Senate seat, now there's no longer an open Senate seat as Hutchinson remains in office at leas through 2012.

In either of these cases, we would likely see the Democratic field in the Senate primary spend time attacking each other as they jockey for a place in near-guaranteed runoff. They might attack the GOP candidates, but only if doing so give them a political advantage over the other Democrat by doing so. Remember, the prize is their own runoff spot, not trying to pick or predict which Republican they get in a runoff with.


Do you think these scenarios are overblown? I admit, I'm trying to make a point, so I get to write the story. But as readers, having lived through the 1998 and 2006 elections in Texas, does this seem familiar to you? Democrats are used to crossing over to vote in GOP primaries if that's where they feel the general election is going to be decided- it's been happening in rural Texas for decades.

The "Kay Bailey is invincible so let's not challenge her" vs "Kay Bailey is invincible because we don't challenge her" argument is a chicken and the egg scenario- it doesn't matter which one is right, both choices are foul (and fowl).

How do we solve this? Here's my simple solution.

  1. Run for Governor.
  2. Attack Hutchison

I know it seems crazy, and it takes risk, but I think this model pays dividends.

Gubernatorial Outcome B: I believe that we underestimate Rick Perry's ability to win a gubernatorial primary against Hutchison. Remember, he's a sitting Governor, and he has nothing to lose. He's going to play for keeps, he will occupy the religious right, and he will attack Hutchison mercilessly from the right, but only from the right. Hutchison's only hope, as outlined above, is to pull enough moderates in as new voters or from the Democratic primary to defeat Perry.

What we need is a strong gubernatorial candidate, maybe even one of the existing Senatorial candidates (hint, hint), to be running for Governor for 2 primary reasons.

  1. To Attack Hutchison from the left.
  2. To give Democrats a reason to stay out of the GOP primary.

By attacking Hutchison from the left, it helps disqualify her as an option for Democratic voters that might be tempted to cross over and vote for her, while also further raising suspicions about her among GOP voters. Heck, our nominee can join in with Perry's attacks on Hutchison if they want to; the point is that the more people that are deflating the hot air that is in Kay Bailey's Big Hair balloon, the better. This results in 2 possibly outcomes.

  1. Hutchison Still Defeats Perry: While not ideal, we've probably accomplished something. A Democratic nominee likely has a more weakened Hutchison than would have otherwise. Having opened up new lines of attack from the left, Hutchison still has to satisfy the right, her base. Perry will make the base hate Kay Bailey in the process of him losing, but in this case, there is a Democrat there and able to take advantage of the opportunity. The myth of invincibility around Hutchison is finally brought down to realistic levels. A tough race, to be sure, but at least she's not getting a free pass and spending her time funneling resources into saving her senate successor or others on the ticket.

  2. Perry Defeats Hutchison: With the help of additional attacks against Hutchison, we've achieved multiple wonderful things. Primarily, our gubernatorial candidate is now facing Perry, a winnable race. We've helped to either
    1. eliminate Kay Bailey from the political scene if she had already resigned to run for Governor, or if she hadn't already resigned
    2. seriously damage her future, be it in the U.S. Senate, running for re-election in 2012 for the Senate, or running for any other office. She could just retire altogether.

I think this final outcome is more likely than we think if we are willing to pursue it. It's a huge payoff, and in my view, why it makes a lot of sense for Democrats to consider the Governor's race seriously. It puts us in the driver's seat, unlike running for the mythically non-vacant Senate seat which is the easy man's out, and out of our control.  

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Either Scenario, White could have won. (5.00 / 1)
I just don't see White winning the Senate race but I believe he could have easily won the Govenor's race against either Perry or Hutchinson.  I'm sorry White decided for the Senate seat and see the fight against Sharp as a serious problem.  


well... (5.00 / 1)
...there is always time for him to switch races. I mean, I don't think anyone would complain and I can't see how it would hurt him politically.

Please read the Community Guidelines and How to Rate Comments.

[ Parent ]
During the U.S. Senate race in 2006 (0.00 / 0)
when I volunteered for Radnofsky, I heard her tell someone that White is afraid of Hutchison.  I have no clue why but other readers might.

[ Parent ]
Thoughts on possible reasons..... (0.00 / 0)
This is only a guess, but her results in previous elections can be fairly intimidating.  I think there is also concern on how best to attack KBH.  He needs tough attacks on her record to dent her image, but those same attacks could also easily backfire on him, causing KBH to wrap herself in the feminist flag and try to frame her fight as a struggle to break through the glass ceiling or against misogynist oppression.

It sounds silly, but look at the flak that Obama got from staunch PUMA Hillary supporters and the much-hyped "Obama called Palin a pig" pseudo-controvery.  The media will love it, and help turn that molehill into a mountain in no time.

I agree with the article, however.  We need a strong candidate who Democrats can support in their own primary.

James Van Sickle
Darwood Technology, LLC
http://www.darwood.us">http://www.darwood.us
http://www.facebook.com/DarwoodTechnology


[ Parent ]
Realistic shot is for Senate (0.00 / 0)
Bill White is a smart politician. He isn't afraid of KBH.
Running for office is an extreme sacrifice of one's time and energy. Throwing time and energy away on an unwinnable race, well that's very Barbara Radnovsky-like. The realistic shot is for Senate. Rick Noriega won't run for Governor, he doesn't want to be a perennial candidate.  

[ Parent ]
Excellent analysis (2.00 / 1)
I have long thought Hutchison is given too much credit.  She has the campaign appeal of ... of ... a corpse.  Even if you want to like her, you are doomed to disappointment once you hear her speak.  Watch her on a talk show, and you will admire the emcee's ability to help her make it through the interview.  She will not have the emcee on the campaign trail, though.

And in the primary Perry is simply going to kill her on the abortion issue.  Have Democrats already forgotten how much the Republican right hates abortion?  She is going to get slaughtered.  That may not mean outright defeat in the primary, but if not, she will be so weakened I think she will be vulnerable; many Republicans will stay home.  The biggest problem for a Democrat is getting the support of feminists who will vote for practically any female who is pro-choice (Democrat activists hate to admit it, but there are a lot of such voters).  A strong female Democrat might have the best shot against her, but I cannot imagine who that would be.


I am a feminist, thank you (4.00 / 2)
and there is no way in hell I would vote for Hutchison just b/c she is a pro-choice female.  Hutchison is a conservative, libertarian leaning Republican period.  She may be pro-choice but she is anti-child everything except perhaps SCHIP b/c she did vote for it unlike her Senator the Jackass colleague Cornyn.  

Even the pro-choice Republicans share their conservative soul mates belief: love the fetus, hate the child.  


[ Parent ]
Well of course most feminists are like you (0.00 / 0)
But I've met plenty who will behave like I described.  The pollsters can perhaps provide specific numbers on this phenomenon.  

[ Parent ]
I should add.. (0.00 / 0)
I've already talked to some feminists who are ready to cross over to the Republican primary to vote for KBH against Perry.  I can certainly understand anyone who hates Perry enough to do the otherwise unthinkable.

[ Parent ]
Meh (3.00 / 1)
Bill White may be even more overrated as a 'Democrat' than Tony Sanchez. He excites no one but insiders with an electability fetish. While I understand the argument for a moderate, we've had enough bloodless candidates in the last 10 years to have learned better by now.

KT, excellent post(since it basically summarizes my thoughts on the whole thing ;) ).

I agree wholeheartedly that KBH is overhyped and has never had her nose bloodied in a real electoral battle. Being a Senator who has mastered the art of doing and saying nothing of consequence over the years makes her wide-open target who can be defined by her opponent.
A primary fight with the zealots could be her undoing, and Perry's camp will almost certainly attack her enough to make moderates in the GOP feel unwelcome come next November. One look at her list of supporters and it's not hard to imagine the primal scream therapy we could see in the Texas GOP next year as they open up old intra-party wounds and create a few new ones. The Dan Patrick crowd is sharpening their bayonets as we speak.

I hope others are listening to your warning about the opportunity cost of failing to push a strong Democratic candidate for guv. We'd deserve another lopsided ass-kicking if we wuss out again, and the cost-benefit analysis is decidedly in favor of running and running hard.  


thanks (0.00 / 0)
I hope this inspires, someone, be it someone new and not announced, or even those thinking about the senate instead to think about the Gov race. If that happens, then we start thinking about Lt Gov as well and everything else.  

Please read the Community Guidelines and How to Rate Comments.

[ Parent ]
Let's Get a Candidate if We Want to Win (0.00 / 0)
We need a real candidate if we want to win.  We lost in 2006 because we didn't nominate a credible candidate.  Sorry, Chris Bell was not credible.  If we want to ahve any chance, we need a candidate.  And there are some out there - Cisneros, White, Sharp, Ron Kirk , Kirk Watson, Lloyd Doggett all would have beaten Perryin 2006 and could beat him in 2010.  

If we're not going to nominate a real candidate, we could still nominate a winning candidate by pulling a Shivers like the Republicans did in 1952 and 1954.  We could nominate KBH (I think it might still be permitted under Texas law but could be wrong).  And if she loses to Perry in the primary, we would be nominating the winner in the general.

But we're not going to beat Perry or KBH unless we do better in getting a nominee than we did in 2006.


[ Parent ]
Thank you for posting (0.00 / 0)
I agree with you.  Hopefully we can get a strong candidate to step up to the plate.  

[ Parent ]
If we end up with either Guv Good Hair or Big Hair (5.00 / 1)
the outcome for Texans will be the same.  Our K-12 schools will continue to rank second to last, we will boast the highest number of uninsured residents, we'll build more prisons instead of schools and the fat cat lobbyists will continue to rule Austin.  Oil companies will have their way with personal property rights.  Just read TXSharon's Blue Daze blog to learn the gory details in this area.  It is appalling and should be criminal.  

We need a strong Democratic candidate. They exist, after all.  Where the hell are they?  


A Few Thoughts (0.00 / 0)
You know, I may be one of those that gives Kay Bay too much credit. Lately I've been starting to rethink. I do still think she wins the governorship if she's the nominee, but I'm beginning to doubt that she's the shoo-in I thought she'd be in the primary, especially if we do have a lively contest on the Democratic side that will keep folks like me from crossing over to vote against Perry.

In any case, good analysis KT. There's definitely a strong case to be made for running some strong candidates--but who are our strong candidates? The trouble is that we don't have much of a bench right now. Plenty of great folks in the minors (the Strama's and Anchia's of the world), but they won't be ready for the big leagues for a while. Think TeamTexas gave a good rundown of what we have to work with: Cisneros, White, Sharp, Watson, Doggett, and Kirk. I'd add Chet Edwards to that list.

But let's look at those choices:
-Cisneros: Too much scandal, and he's sure been out of public life for a while.
-White: Mr. Ryland is right, Bill White is vastly overrated. His popularity in Houston is a great starting point, but really, the guy's about as exciting as his name.
-Sharp: Probably one of our best bets, and he has nothing to lose since he doesn't hold an office. I'm worried that his time may have passed, though (he'd have been a better candidate in 2006).
-Watson: Another good bet, though we should probably be careful running an Austinite statewide. But I don't know that he'd want to risk losing his Senate seat.
-Doggett: Lots of problems here. From Austin, easily painted as a Washington liberal, would risk losing his seat in Congress, and probably doesn't even want the job.
-Kirk: Not sure what to think about Ron Kirk. He couldn't win statewide for an open seat in 2002, I'm just not sure he could beat an incumbent (KBH kinda counts as an incumbent too). Don't think Texas has changed THAT much in 8 years
-Edwards: Same story as Doggett, except for the Austin part, plus probably harder to portray as too liberal.

In sum, Sharp, Watson, and, to a lesser extent, Edwards look best, but I can't say I'd really blame them if they didn't want to risk their future prospects or current offices by making a gutsy run for Governor in what will probably not be a great year for Democrats the way 2006 and 2008 were.


On Kirk (0.00 / 0)
I can't speak for the other mentions, but I suspect that Ron Kirk is going to want to spend a few years as US Trade Representative under the Obama Administration.  It will be interesting to see what he does after that, or how that position could boost his credentials in a state-wide race.

James Van Sickle
Darwood Technology, LLC
http://www.darwood.us">http://www.darwood.us
http://www.facebook.com/DarwoodTechnology


[ Parent ]
re:A Few Thoughts (0.00 / 0)
What about Noriega??  I think we all learned two things from the senate race: you can't win a statewide election if 75% of the electorate has never even heard of you, and that there was no significant dirt on this guy.  He did finally get some traction in the last couple of weeks (when he finally started running advertising).  He is at least as good a candidate as some of the other names on this list.  I will continue to think that a strong latino candidate is our best hope for driving democratic turnout.  Otherwise, I think Edwards looks good, but the rest are too Austin, too has been, or are Ron Kirk, who I can't imagine will quit his job in the Whitehouse for and uncertain (at best) run in Texas.

[ Parent ]
Hm. (3.00 / 1)
Don't know about Noriega. He's got the name ID now, but he's not very dynamic as a candidate and his senatorial campaign was poorly run. The only way it would work is if he hired better campaign people and figured out how to talk about something besides Iraq.

[ Parent ]
Noriega's best shot (0.00 / 0)
I've said for three years now that Noriega would be a great candidate for Lt. Gov.  Lt. Colonel for Lt. Governor!  What a concept!

Seriously, it makes more sense than his Senate race did.  All his experience is at the state level; he knows Texas government.  He could be a good Lt. Gov. and it would not be overreaching, as the Senate race was.


[ Parent ]
Real Candidates (0.00 / 0)
Alex:
Thanks for adding Chet Edwards to the list.  An oversight on my part.  I too might add Noriega but he had problems raising money that the others wouldn't.

All of the candidates I listed might decide against the race or have negatives and could well lose.  We had a very strong ticket in 2002 that got destroyed.  Part of my point is that, even if we're going to lose, we need strong candidates.  Our ticket was incredibly, perhaps embarassingly weak, in 2006.  I listed six (and Edwards and Noriega have since been added) to candidates who would be vast improvements over the top of our ticket in 2006.  We should get as many of them on the ticket as possible.


[ Parent ]
On White (mainly) (0.00 / 0)
White is overrated, but not necessarily vastly.  No, he's not exciting, but he has two things going for him:

1. He has some very smart people who work for him and are very loyal to him.  This helps a campaign a lot.

2. More importantly, his experience with Katrina, Rita, and Ike show leadership for an executive office.  Put him side-by-side with Perry on all those situations and you'll see he wins.  He hasn't been a perfect Mayor, but he has shown genuine and solid competence on issues that this state desperately needs such a quality.  Unfortunately, such managerial competence is not as high on the list of requirements for a good US Senator; the current seat he is running for.

--

On your other names, I think Kirk needs time as trade rep. and Edwards wouldn't want to leave his seat.
As far as Watson, it's a possibility.
And with Sharp, I essentially see Sharp as a very similar candidate to White.  They are both relatively boring yet very smart and pretty competent people.  The difference is that White doesn't really have any experience that transfers greatly to the Senate, and Sharp really wants to be a senator.

I also think Cisneros can be a credible candidate even with the scandal.  It's not that big.

"Let us tenderly and kindly cherish therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write."  -  John Adams


[ Parent ]
Noriega yes. (0.00 / 0)
I think his run last year could set the stage for a much stronger campaign in 2010. He made himself a big-leaguer and now has broken the name ID barrier, and with stronger financial backing a a real ground game could be a tough opponent for either Perry or KBH.

I could live with a slate of Sharp for Senate, Noriega for Guv, and Van dePutte for Lt. Guv. Throw in Hank Gilbert for Ag, Bill Moody for SC Justice, and find strong candidates for AG and Land Commish and we've got a solid ticket to get behind.  


Van de Putte (0.00 / 0)
Ah yes, I forgot about Van de Putte. She's definitely got a future. Lt. Gov. might be worth a shot--although she too would be risking her current office.

[ Parent ]
KBH, real candidates, and the implications (4.33 / 3)
First, I agree that KBH is more problematic in a general election than Perry, because she's managed to be as low key a senior senator as one can be, developing a reputation as responsive in constituent services but otherwise managing to spend the last 15 years without doing or saying anything of consequence, which is appealing in it's own way.

Perry, for all of his flaws, has a real record and an agenda, and has tried and failed at some things, and is posturing to attack Hutchinson from the social right.

Now because we're liberals we think that a primary contest where Rick Perry runs to the right and beats her helps us, and that's possibly true. But what is certain is that without a real ticket and a real message, and real coordination and a real party organization backing it all we won't win squat regardless.

We've got to get our heads out of this idea that somehow we're going to find Senor(a) Right and that she will redeem us all by sheer force of personal appeal.
Yes, the top of the ticket counts more than any other one thing. But the reason we haven't won any statewide races in count 'em 14 years is not for lack of celebrity. The problem is is that we have failed to execute on a strategic level and find ourselves with no brand equity as Texas Democrats and no bench of possibles except (no offense to anybody) retreads from the 80's.

And this is particularly galling when we do find ourselves running decent fresh candidates, like Noriega, because he has no structure to stand on but his own impressiveness. A Senate race, as proud as he all made us, is not the appropriate forum to build ID.

No- Robert Ryland is absolutely right. Beyond finding Gov and Senate candidates, we need to be opportunistically finding bright, fresh, what Joe Biden might call "clean" candidates to run for Ag and Land and SBOE and Railroad, and coordinate the entire ticket on an overarching thematic campaign of good government and reform.

A well built ticket that generates value from the bottom up will put us in a sustainable position to win more races in the future than trying to save the party from the top down with nothing real to say (2002), or worse, pretending that there is no election (2006).


[ Parent ]
humming a couple more bars on this theme (0.00 / 0)
Speaking of strategy, it seems to me that the real problem we've had on a statewide level this decade was letting the GOP donors off easy when it comes to the down-ballot races, even though we know any Dem with a Pulse can probably draw 40% in the Gov race, absent a Kinky and Carole kerfuffle.

one strategy for the Democrats would be to pick a weaker spot in the GOP statewide ticket and go all-in there, in order to force dollars away from the Gov race.

Let's say Perry is the nominee for the moment (and I think he will be).
You've got Jerry Patterson sitting in a job (Land) that is critical to the GOP economic interests, who has been weakened by the Christmas Mountains Fiasco, and generally underperformed the GOP ticket in 2006, though not by much.

If we ran a strong up and comer against Patterson and really supported and featured the race (joint campaign with the Gov candidate, run on some themes of collecting the rent from the oil companies, rebuilding the texas coastline from Ike, etc), we'd be forcing KBH friendly GOP big money donors who are put off by Perry's move to the social right to put their money into Patterson's reelection, which would weaken Perry's ability to campaign against whoever we run for Gov.

My point here is that despite the differences, none of our Gov candidates will really be a whole lot better than the other against KBH or Perry. But the GOP would not know what to do if we had a decent Gov pick to match with a really strong, well funded pick for Land or Ag or Railroad, which to their money people are equally or more important jobs in the grand scheme of things.


[ Parent ]
Good analysis on the gubernatorial options (0.00 / 0)
I can count myself in the "KBH is unbeatable" camp but your analysis gave a different perspective that I like. The Big Hairdo is beatable provided we bring a good candidate to the table. It's a good thing I waited until getting home from work. Some great comments have evolved throughout the day. Personally I like Alex's the best on analysis of the options.

This sums up a point I've been making in other posts that we seem to have a hard time fielding a good candidate for the marquee races, primarily due to an issue of statewide recognition. We have good candidates but they fall short due to lack of name recognition across the state.

The issue you have with the names is that some of them are in slots we want them to stay in. Edwards is a great example. Pulling him out of that district would most likely result in a loss of a seat in Congress. He's solid, does a lot of great work, and it would be a shame to lose that slot.

I agree with Kirk. He needs some time in seat as Trade Rep before coming back to Texas to tackle a statewide election. He is one I would put on the statewide list in a few years so there's a candidate in the making. I think VDP as LG would be a great move. It's a natural progression for her in the Senate and sets her up for the statewide list for the governor slot. Once again, grow the candidate.

Noriega just doesn't have the "wow" factor in terms of a race like the governor's race. Going against KBH or Perry he would get creamed by their star power.

So KT, I think you accomplished your task in making us do a little thinking and realize the race can be won if the right candidate and strategy is put in place. If not 2010 then maybe 2014. I know it's a ways off but let's get some thought leadership going on these races and start setting the stage for a victory.

Remember, you turn Texas blue one election at a time.


Down Ticket Races (0.00 / 0)
Great analysis.  I learn something every time I read you or Phillip Martin.  Thanks for all your hard work.  I do agree that we need to go against Hutchison in any way we can.  We need to weaken her.  I would love it if we had Perry to run against.  It would be easier to beat him.  We also need to have her spend as much money as possible, so she doesn't have much to help with other races.

As for down ticket races.  There are a lot of good ideas being thrown around.  I do have an idea though.  Why not make this the year of the woman.  If we end up having Hutchison as the GOP candidate, you are going to pull out women.  I really like the idea of Letitia Van De Putte running for Lt. Governor.  I understand that she is very politically astute.  If you have her, what is to prevent these women from crossing over to vote for Letitia.  And while we're at it, I hear that Barbara Radnofsky is considering running for AG.  She could be another cross over vote. The would most likely be running against Dewhurst and Abbot, respectively.  This would cause these two people to spend money that they would probably be hoarding for a run for senate or to help other candidates.  This might help someone like Hank Gilbert.

It would sure be nice to win one State wide office in 2010.

 MKC


I've got an idea (0.00 / 0)
Half the Democratic presidential primary voters voted for a woman. Why don't we put a woman on the Republican presidential ticket, since women will just vote for women, and not for the candidate that best represents the values that lead them to the Democratic party.  After all, that's why we have Governor Carole Keaton 4-names in Texas.

I am 100% behind efforts to increase the number of women officeholders in Texas, I donate to individual candidates and groups like Annie's List.  But running a candidate based solely on gender is a cheap gimmick, and voters see right through it.


[ Parent ]
Jim Dunnam (0.00 / 0)
Here's the video of him standing up to Craddick in May 2007. He has a very relaxed confidence and a big, deep-in-the-heart of Texas voice.

The recent Waco Trib article...

By his own admission, Dunnam isn't a political leader with a master plan. He senses the moment and improvises.

(Interesting that this overall "positive" article about Dunnam is followed by some very negative comments that are way too "organized.")

He may not have huge statewide "name recognition,"  but he seems to have some other very important qualities necessary to attract Texas voters.

What a beautiful family...



What if (0.00 / 0)
Kay Bailey is a decoy?

She is, after all the highest ranking Republican woman senator and ranked 34th out of 100 senators overall in seniority. I understand why she might want to get out of Washington since she may be "tired" of it, but truly, why does she really want to be Governor and go through what will most likely be a very nasty primary? Is this her pathway to POTUS? At age 65??

All of this speculation will easily keep the attention on the Texas Republican Party and what may transpire between her and Perry.  


I'm afraid that KBH (0.00 / 0)
will be pulling in money now that could have potentially gone a D candidate for gov.  This happened 2 years ago when the traditional D donors gave to CKS.  Remember her motto - I'm the only one that can beat him (Rick Perry).  If all D's had supported Bell from the begining the outcome may have been different.  There was no way he had a chance to win a state wide campaign with as little money as he raised.  I looked at the list of her supporters and recognized a name or two that have given to Democrats in the past.  And when the Governor talks about adding laws to require pregnant women to see their sonogram prior to having an abortion - that galvanizes both the Right to Lifers and the Pro-Choice groups.  Right now, the Pro-Choice groups have only one candidate and that is where their money is going.

Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On the Go: Mobile App

Upcoming BOR Events

"Do I Look Illegal?"
Arizona GOP Debate Watch

Wednesday, February 22
6:00-9:00 p.m.
Angie's Restaurant
1307 E. 7th Street
RSVP on Facebook

Save The Date:
Super Tuesday Super Watch Party!
Tuesday, March 6
6:00-10:00 p.m.
Scholz Garten
1607 San Jacinto



Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Grading Texas
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox