Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


HD-105: What to Expect in the Upcoming Recount


by: Karl-Thomas Musselman

Thu Nov 13, 2008 at 03:02 PM CST


From the Lone Star Project, things we can look forward to in the upcoming recount in HD-105 to determine if Linda Harper-Brown really goes back to the House with her 20 vote lead over Bob Romano.

Final resolution of the HD105 contest may take some time. Here's what we can expect over the next several days:

  • The Dallas County Commissioners Court will certify the results as reported by election officials.
  • Bob Romano must file a request for a recount no later than two days following the certification of the ballot by the Commissioners Court.
  • A Recount Committee will be appointed by the Dallas Elections Administrator. The Committee will then examine each ballot to determine the intent of each voter.

Quirk in electronic voting machines could determine outcome

In Dallas County, ES&S electronic voting machines are used during early voting, while paper ballots are used on Election Day. One of the notable flaws in ES&S machines is that voters who cast a straight ticket ballot but then also attempt to "emphasis" vote by marking the box next to a particular candidate inadvertently deselect that candidate thereby canceling their vote.

When the voting screens are reviewed during a recount, these errors should be caught and corrected (Source: TX Election Code Section 65.007).  In HD105, Democrats cast more straight ticket ballots than Republicans.  As the under vote flaw caused by "emphasis" voting is caught and corrected, more Romano votes are likely to be restored than Harper-Brown votes.

Obviously, we don't know if the ES&S flaw will reveal enough previously uncounted votes for Romano to overcome Harper-Brown's narrow 20-vote lead.  Clearly, though, a recount of the early votes in HD105 is justified. Further, this race points to the need that the electronic voting machine flaw should be corrected.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Deselection counts on Straight Party in a recount?! (0.00 / 0)
So the ES&S straight ticket de-selection can be counted as a vote for the down ballot? Really? I had no idea.  Is that settled law, or are we down for a federal court appeal to make that stick?

That's huge. I mean given the 74 known Craddick opponents thats #$@#$@# huge.

This requires having a fine glass of wine and lobster now.


just curious (0.00 / 0)
and not to detract from Mr. Romano, who obviously ran a heck of a campaign to get where he is, but - do we really think there's a large enough bloc of voters that wanted to emphasize their votes for Bob Romano?

Linda Harper Brown dropped tens of thousands of Craddick dollars to get her votes to the polls, wouldn't straight party emphasis votes be more slanted towards LHB, who probably bombarded households with mail?

I'll readily admit I don't know much about the numbers in this race, and I hope my initial reactions are off.


[ Parent ]
No but (0.00 / 0)
there are a lot cases where people straight party vote and then emphasize every candidate. Problem is that I dont think they count those on the recount. The legal theory pressed in the Fifth Circuit by the SOS is that since the instructions warn them (not very well, but once anyway) that this action cancels their vote, they can't prove the voter isn't doing it on purpose. This might make a lick of sense (though bear no relationship to reality) if the voter were "emphasizing" one voter, because it would a more convenient way to vote in every race but one than selecting all the candidates minus one individually. Asked at oral argument how that theory could apply to people that emphasized every candidate after a straight party vote, the Secretary of State's Attorney said "people do funny things in the voting booth."

Stolen legally.


[ Parent ]
Should read (0.00 / 0)
"...if the voter were 'emphasizing' one candidate..."

[ Parent ]
I dont think they will count the emphasis votes as votes... (0.00 / 0)
absent legal action. The Republican SOS office fought efforts to rectify this problem, and successfully defended the touch screens in the Fifth Circuit.

Stolen legally.


And they shouldn't count (0.00 / 0)
Improperly cast votes should count if the intent of the voter is clear. But in this case, there's no way to tell the difference between an "I want to vote for all the Dems but Romano" voter and an "I want to vote for all the Dems, especially Romano" voter.

Of course they should fix this bug in the touch screens, but until they do, an ambiguous vote isn't a vote at all.  


[ Parent ]
The question is academic... (0.00 / 0)
only the Scotus can overrule the Fifth Circuit, so we are stuck with this rule this time unless they care to intevene. More important is the fact that we agree that the touch-screens need to be fixed. We can politely disagree about our levels of outrage -- personally, I think the SOS and the GOP knew exactly that the consequences of these touch-screens would be to ensnare a number of enthusiastic voters into accidentally cancelling their votes and that was the point. It is the moral, though not the legal, equivalent of a "Dems vote on Wednesday, Reps on Tuesday flyer."

[ Parent ]
Fixed? (0.00 / 0)
More important is the fact that we agree that the touch-screens need to be fixed.

I politely disagree. Not fixed. Ditched. Thank you.


[ Parent ]
Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On the Go: Mobile App

Upcoming BOR Events

"Do I Look Illegal?"
Arizona GOP Debate Watch

Wednesday, February 22
6:00-9:00 p.m.
Angie's Restaurant
1307 E. 7th Street
RSVP on Facebook

Save The Date:
Super Tuesday Super Watch Party!
Tuesday, March 6
6:00-10:00 p.m.
Scholz Garten
1607 San Jacinto



Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Grading Texas
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox