Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond
Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Follow Burnt Orange Report on Twitter (@BOR) and Facebook.

TX-10: Fact Checking the First Larry Joe Doherty/Mike McCaul Meeting


by: Matt Glazer

Tue Oct 28, 2008 at 04:00 PM CDT


The Houston Chronicle has a great article today with play-by-play of the first meeting between 10th District foes for Congress: Democrat Larry Joe Doherty and Republican Incumbent Mike McCaul.

The articles sub-headline cuts right to the chase: Doherty slams McCaul on taxes, health care and his voting record.

It is time McCaul (TX-Rubberstamp) is exposed for the partisan politician he is:

  • "I've been an independent voice up there, and that's important to me," said McCaul."

Fact: According to Congressional Quarterly , McCaul has voted with his party 95% - that is hardly and independent voice.

  • "McCaul said he had schedule conflicts on dates offered by debate sponsors."

Fact: Doherty issued a release saying he would agree to a debate at "a time and place that will work best for [McCaul's] schedule."

  • "McCaul did not respond to Doherty's charge that the congressman voted to cut Medicare reimbursements, then switched his vote when he saw it would make no difference to the outcome of the legislation."

Fact: McCaul's initial decision was to vote against doctors and Medicare beneficiaries who need critical health care, but when he realized he could avoid a PR disaster before the final bell, he flipped.

The McCaul campaign is running scared and trying to hide behind false facts and an empty record for the voters of Texas' 10th Congressional District.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Don't Usually Respond to Trolls (5.00 / 1)
MEDICARE IMPROVEMENTS FOR PATIENTS AND PROVIDERS ACT OF 2008

(House of Representatives - June 24, 2008)

Mr. DANIEL E. LUNGREN of California changed his vote from ``yea'' to ``nay.''  Messrs. CHABOT, WHITFIELD of Kentucky, FRANK of Massachusetts, GRAVES, HASTINGS of Washington, WELLER of Illinois, LATTA, FARR, Mrs. MYRICK, Messrs. GALLEGLY, REICHERT, Mrs. MILLER of Michigan, Messrs. MCKEON, MANZULLO, MILLER of Florida, BOOZMAN, WILSON of South Carolina, MACK, DREIER, ISSA, CALVERT, HALL of Texas, Mrs. DRAKE, Messrs. HUNTER, ROGERS of Kentucky, GARY G. MILLER of California, MCCAUL of Texas, KLINE of Minnesota, RAMSTAD, Mrs. McMORRIS RODGERS, Ms. FALLIN, Messrs. KINGSTON, DEAL of Georgia, and BROWN of South Carolina changed their vote from ``nay'' to ``yea.''  


As for Partinsanship (5.00 / 1)
McCaul represents part of Austin, Harris County, and 6 rural counties - do you think that grouping of consitutents agrees 94% with the President?

This district was clearly gerrymandered by Tom Craddick, Tom DeLay, Rick Perry and Republican leadership so Republicans in Harris County and in the rural counties to outweigh the Democrats.

It's the same strategy they used for Lloyd Doggett and the same strategy they used for Lamar Smith (who oddly represents UT).

However, the tide has changed and Democrats are coming out of the woodwork as we saw in the Primary with 13,000 new Democrat voters in TX-10.


[ Parent ]
I wish (1.33 / 3)
all the voters in TX-10, could meet Larry Joe face to face as the Houston Chronicle editorial board was able to do.  I think many of those voting a straight "D" ticket might go back and change their TX-10 vote.  Although listening to the guy ramble on with unsubstantiated criticism and innuendo is entertaining  I don't think it is what we are looking for in a representative.  In fact if he were elected and had no McCaul to criticize he wouldn't know what to do with himself.  

Hopefully most voters will agree with the Chronicle and chose substance and character over a "character" who is best suited for reality TV.  


[ Parent ]
Matt Glazer - Facts are key... (1.50 / 2)

Does 94% matter when looking at the President Mr. Glazer? I think not...McCaul voted against the President about 20% of the time...do the math and I don't think that equals 94%.

He voted with his Party and Ideology about 94% of the time. The next time you present the facts...I hope you give the American people the truth in the matter (THE REAL FACTS).

SDHOOKS - Great point...we need SUBSTANCE and CHARACTER...not a "CHARACTER".

McCaul '08 - Let's keep OUR CONGRESSMAN in Washington.

-The Truthseeker


Where did the other comments go? (1.50 / 2)

Also, could we please keep all of the comments visible...even if they don't represent your view, or maybe even show that you aren't presenting the TRUE FACTS?

The American People would like the truth and you're ok with just showing the facts that are misleading.

-The Truthseeker


Our Users (5.00 / 1)
This is a community site, and because of that, our community members have ranked your comments with a 0.  When a comment gets below a .5 as their average ranking it becomes hidden.

Clearly our readers disapprove of your comments.

Perhaps sourcing "your facts" and being respectful will boost your future ratings high enough for you to be able to become a "trusted user" and you will be able to see hidden comments and rate other members with a 0 or 5 to show how much you approve or disapprove of their writing.

If all your comments are getting hidden by our readers, you should probably stop and think about why.  


[ Parent ]
In the immortal words of Dennis (1.50 / 2)
Help! Help! we're being repressed. 0 = Not toeing the Party line?

Can't remember who said it but I think it is appropriate, "You are entitled to your own opinion (0-5), but not your own facts."


[ Parent ]
McCaul Endorsed by the Houston Chronicle! (1.50 / 2)

Matt Glazer doesn't keep these comments up long enough to even give me a chance to gain any favorable ratings. And yes one is entitled to their rating, but they are also entitled to the true facts of this election...which is what I am bringing to you.

Hopefully Matt and the BOR Crew will allow this comment to stay up longer than the 30 mins. you allowed the last one...and maybe someone will have a chance to express their opinion as well.

There's no hiding this fact:

Congressman Michael McCaul has been ENDORSED by the HOUSTON CHRONICLE. Obviously during their first encounter McCaul was not "slammed" too hard by Doherty...seeing that he came out on top. The Houston Chronicle must realize as well that Michael McCaul is the man that will best represent Congressional District 10, and that he is the man with the character, integrity, and substance to lead us in the right direction. As SDHOOK stated, we need someone with CHARACTER, not a "character" leading us through the next two years.

Please feel free to view the endorsement below:

http://www.chron.com/disp/stor...

Vote to keep OUR CONGRESSMAN, Michael McCaul, in Washington working for us!

-The Truthseeker


Mobile Blog Reader - powered by Notice Orange

Burnt Orange Reader

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Poll
Who do you support in the 299th District Court Runoff?
Mindy Montford
Karen Sage

Results

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- A Capitol Blog
- As the Island Floats
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Grading Texas
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Burnt Orange Reporters
Publisher - Karl-Thomas M.
Editor-in-Chief - Matt G.
Staff Writer - David M.
Staff Writer - Katherine H.
Staff Writer - Michael H.
Staff Writer - Todd H.
Man of Mystery - Phillip M.
Founder - Byron L.

Powered by: SoapBlox