Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


David Beckwith Violates Hatch Act?


by: Matt Glazer

Mon Jul 07, 2008 at 00:51 PM CDT


Let's talk Hatch Act.

A few days ago, David Mauro asked an important question, was David Beckwith using federal resources to campaign or was he campaigning for Junior Senator John Cornyn while the taxpayers picked up the tab.

With over 80 comments on BOR alone, Beckwith very clearly posted comments during traditional work hours (9 a.m. to 5 p.m.).   Immediately, Beckwith has violated the spirit of the Hatch Act because he is no longer working on a campaign during his off time hours.  At best, Beckwith is a ghost worker and taking taxpayer dollars for no work.  At worst, he is paying paid by tax payers to actively engage in partisan political activities.

The Senate Ethics Manual (be careful it is a pdf) states in Chapter 6:

Senate employees are compensated from funds of the Treasury for regular performance of official duties. They are not paid to do campaign work. In the words of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia: ''It is clear from the record that Congress has recognized the basic principle that government funds should not be spent to help incumbents gain reelection.''

[...]

An employee's ''own time'' includes time beyond regular working hours, any accrued annual leave or non-government hours of a part-time employee. Staff may not be required to do political work as a condition of Senate employment. Just as Senate employees are free to campaign for their employing Members on their own time, they may also use their free time or, with the permission of their employing Members, reduce their Senate hours (with a commensurate reduction in pay) to campaign for presidential candidates, other federal candidates, or state or local aspirants. With respect to the question of leave time to perform campaign activities, it is the Committee's understanding that the Senate does not recognize a ''leave of absence.''

Already Beckwith seems to have violated the law, but let's look at some of his comments.  Beckwith responds almost exclusively to posts relating to the U.S. Senate race between Noriega and Watts or Noriega and Cornyn.

Let's go through some of the comments now (note most of these comments are during normal work hours and none make it clear that Buck Smith is Beckwith in any way).  In one of Buck Smith/ David Beckwith's first comments, he points our readers to a statement by Sen. Cornyn that shows why TSA shouldn't have collective bargaining.  Another work time comment critiques a poll done by Survey USA.  Yet another comment during business hours asks for Q1 fundraising totals from his boss, John Cornyn. Mr. Beckwith steals an article from Roll Call here  and another article on production quality here (did his boss or taxpayers pay for these?).   Beckwith tries to suppress Noriega's fundraising here and he attacks the online community and our incredible fundraising efforts here.

Those are just some of the campaign comments he made (there are about 20 more), but I wanted to spend some time on hypocrisy as well.

On more than one occasion, Beckwith either started a rumor/story on BOR or called out other consultants for not mentioning their name.  Again it is important to note, at no time did Beckwith mention who he was, who he worked for, or that he was not using state funded internet or computers or time to post these comments.

He outed local political operatives here, here, and he tried incorrectly here.  On the other hand he kicked off a story close to home for him here and actively campaign against Rosemary Lehmberg here.

Let's be clear.  Beckwith was actively campaigning for John Cornyn.  He may or may not have used state resources but he clearly used state time.  He violated the Hatch Act directly by advocating against Rosemary Lehmberg for District Attorney and may have violated it another 20 to 30 times from other comments.  Beckwith never identified he was or who he worked for so it is likely he knew what he was doing was wrong.  While Karen Hughes did not fire Beckwith, it is clear John Cornyn needs to or investigators should find out how much Cornyn knew and what taxpayer resources were going to Beckwith's online endeavors.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Just another bad Attorney General... (3.00 / 1)
We all know Cornyn is a bad Senator, but not many people remember he was also the Att. Gen of Texas too, which Little John so fondly reminds us of in his commercial.

Seems like we as a state have a bad reputation for our lawmen... Cornyn, Alberto Conzales.. Dubya. This team has ruined our reputation for many, many years.

Shame on you, David Beckwith... shame for all true Texans.


What does the Hatch Act actually say? (0.00 / 0)
The Hatch Act applies only to executive branch employees, not to the legislative branch. Perhaps you should should quote the Hatch Act instead of the Senate Ethics Manual if you are going to accuse him of violating the Act itself. Then your case might actually have some merit.

Are You David Beckwith? (0.00 / 0)
Maybe a friend?

Help build a progressive movement in Texas. Join Progress Texas.

[ Parent ]
Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On the Go: Mobile App

Upcoming BOR Events

"Do I Look Illegal?"
Arizona GOP Debate Watch

Wednesday, February 22
6:00-9:00 p.m.
Angie's Restaurant
1307 E. 7th Street
RSVP on Facebook

Save The Date:
Super Tuesday Super Watch Party!
Tuesday, March 6
6:00-10:00 p.m.
Scholz Garten
1607 San Jacinto



Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Grading Texas
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox