Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Editorial: We Must Be the Change We Want to See


by: Phillip Martin, Progress Texas

Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 07:15 AM CDT


Standing here, the old man said to me
Long before these crowded streets, here stood my dreaming tree
Below it he would sit, for hours at a time
Now progress takes away, what forever took to find...
---"The Dreaming Tree" by the Dave Matthews Band

Twenty weeks ago, on February 13, we at Burnt Orange Report endorsed Senator Barack Obama. It's an endorsement I was proud to see us make, as I believe he will make an extraordinary President. But that doesn't mean I still don't have concerns about an Obama Presidency -- concerns that I, and no other Democrat, should sweep under the rug.

Specifically, Obama's pathetic statement about the House's passage of the Federal Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Like many progressives -- especially those of us who call ourselves "policy progressives" -- I was wholly outraged at Obama's statement on the legislation. The equivocation, pandering, and political cover in his statement was severely disappointing.

I can understand wanting to "play to the center" on legislation that wasn't so clear cut. But the FISA legislation the House foolishly let slide through was making Bush's illegal wiretapping program legal -- and it's not like the prior process made it difficult, in any way, for America to counter terrorist efforts through wiretapping. We just, you know, wanted a small modicum of accountability.

Instead, the legislation out of the House makes pretty much everything Bush did illegally, legal. There's even immunity for phone companies -- something Obama, to his credit, has pledged to either remove from the bill or vote against. Many others in the Senate are also on board, either with a "no" vote or on removing immunity. But the whole law needs to be killed.

The national netroots did a tremendous job stepping up and calling out Obama -- and the House Democrats who passed it -- last week. I didn't write about it because there was no real Texas tie-in, and I try to focus on Texas politics. But as I've thought about this more and more, there is something dramatically important to all of us with what happens today in the U.S. Senate.

This election is about change, but Senator Obama will only deliver as much change as we want him to make. We can't stand back and be comfortable with his excellent campaigning -- we need to join in, as Matt Stoller wrote about expertly at Open Left in his post titled, "The Obama Accountability Movement":

By marginalizing the policy liberals within his campaign the way he has mowed down the outside groups, Obama is limiting his range of motion going forward and showing key progressive allies that he may not be a good faith operator after all unless he can be forced in that direction.  And so they will dedicate more energy going forward into ensuring that they aren't embarrassed again by the person that we are all trusting as our party leader.

As we wrote when we endorsed Obama:

Trading Republican lobbyists and insiders for Democratic lobbyists and insiders is not change....The change we need must be adaptive. It must be a change that challenges Americans to look at the loyalties in our lives and, more importantly, the loyalties in the lives of those around us....It must be a change in how we define Presidential leadership.

Yes, Senator Barack Obama is making waves around the country -- and right here on BOR -- for announcing that he will run a 50-state strategy this November. I'm as excited as anyone about how expertly Obama is running a campaign. But we can challenge our leaders as we support them. Yes, we can. 

If we don't, progress will take away what forever took to find.

Today marks an important moment in this campaign. How will Senator Obama lead in his only official capacity --- not as a candidate, or even presumptive Democratic Party Presidential nominee, but as a Senator, when the Senate takes up the FISA legislation today. Here's hoping he delivers the kind of change we all believe -- and hope -- he can.

For more on Obama, FISA, & the netroots, read this excellent article over at Politico.

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
I am so glad to see this here. (5.00 / 1)
We have to hold him accountable!  That's the only way we will get the change we need and deserve.  

Elect 'em (0.00 / 0)
Then hold their feet to the fire! It has always been so, and will always be so.

Thank you, Philip, (5.00 / 1)
for making this statement. There are indeed some troubling things about Barack Obama, such as his pathetically lame statement on FISA and his association with Milton Friedman disciples. To sweep these things under the rug in the name of candidate loyalty or party loyalty is to indulge in the very same mental transaction as do every generation's false patriots who equate dissent with nonpatriotism.

We can't until after we elect 'em to hold their feet to the fire. After they get elected they don't need us any more until 4 years later. In order to be honest with ourselves and true to our convictions we have to hold their feet to the fire all the time, not some of the time. And, at the time they are campaigning to get elected is the most politically practical time because that is when they need us the most.

The FISA saga goes to the heart of everything Cheney, Bush, Gonzales, Rumsfeld, and the rest of the neocon criminals have put both our country and the world through for 7 nightmare years - spitting on the Constitutional checks and balances, the Bill of Rights, and the rule of law by purporting to legalize what was flagrantly illegal, and more so, will still be Constitutionally improper under the 4th Amendment even if enacted as legislation. The records of the 4th Amendment debates reflect that the Framers plainly intended to forbid general warrants, i.e., warrants that are not based on particularized probable cause and do not specify the particular places to be searched and the particular things that are sought in the search. The proposed FISA rewrite flies in the face of this fundamental tenet of our Bill of Rights.

For Senator Obama, a former instructor of Constitutional Law at a major university law school, to support this frontal assault on the First, Fourth, and Ninth Amendments (at least), is very, very troubling about an apparent willingness to sacrifice even the most fundamental of principles for the sake of perceived political expediency. Or even worse is the possibility that it may genuinely reflect a view of the Bill of Rights that is more in accord with Samuel Alito than with Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. To withhold the expression of valid concerns, criticism, or outrage over Senator Obama's disregard of some of our deepest Constitutional principles concerning the Rule of Law and the Bill of Rights would not be a politics of principle and would not reflect "change" by any stretch, except possibly backward change.

Further, Barack Obama is not just one Senator any more. He is the chosen nominee of his party to be the chief executive of the nation. He should be exerting leadership in opposing the FISA abomination. It is also troubling to me that we are not seeing anything approaching such leadership from him at this terrible moment.

David Van Os


This is a great piece... (0.00 / 0)
Well written, insightful and thought provoking.  So all of that is great but what really means a lot to me as a sometime reader is that it's issue driven and not personality driven.  My major complaint against BOR is that you all tend to put good guy white hats on certain folks and then pretend they can do no wrong or just the opposite with those you deem bad guys. While I think we can all agree that Barack Obama is a wonderful candidate for president, he is by no means infallible and if folks like you, those that have been supportive for a long time, don't hold him accountable now during the campaign, we can expect a great deal more triangulation (a fancy way to say selling out) and disappointment in the future.  Thanks Phillip.    

As soon as i read about this (0.00 / 0)
I was wondering if it would be reported on BOR.  Im glad to see it being discussed.  I have been a very strong Obama supporter, and figured that the rhetoric would change between that of the primaries and the general election, but there are some things that out of basic principle cannot be compromised on.  

now then (5.00 / 1)
You couldn't be more right about the importance of his Senate job today.

I feel that despite his new role as nominee, there still exists a profound pecking order in the Senate and he should focus on playing his standard role.

After all, Sen. Durbin (also from Illinois) is the 2nd in command behind Reid and I'm certain doesn't want his junior telling the leadership how to lead.  Furthermore, based on the House vote I'm inclined to believe there is more to this than meets the eye and I don't think it is wise for Obama to take too much of a leadership role as a failure would reflect on his future prospects (as commander in chief) of wooing the senate majority to his side.

That said, I think Obama's role as a Senator opposed to this incarnation of FISA should make that position known.  And he needs to make sure that his position is bold, progressive and in keeping with our Bill of Rights, our Constitution and our good 'ol common sense.

Very nice piece with an important and timely message.

Please refer to KT's signature.


Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On the Go: Mobile App

Upcoming BOR Events

"Do I Look Illegal?"
Arizona GOP Debate Watch

Wednesday, February 22
6:00-9:00 p.m.
Angie's Restaurant
1307 E. 7th Street
RSVP on Facebook

Save The Date:
Super Tuesday Super Watch Party!
Tuesday, March 6
6:00-10:00 p.m.
Scholz Garten
1607 San Jacinto



Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Grading Texas
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox