Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


TX-Sen: Noriega Should Endorse The Responsible Plan


by: Jason Rosenbaum

Tue Mar 18, 2008 at 04:24 PM CDT


(The Responsible Plan was announced last night at Take Back America.  It is a smart proposal to responsibly end the war in Iraq, and Rick Noriega is the responsible choice to represent us in Washington D.C. - promoted by Matt Glazer)

Last night, 10 congressional candidates unveiled “The Responsible Plan To End The War In Iraq.” The Plan, as both a policy and a political strategy is brilliant:

The Plan is a two-pronged strategy. First and foremost, it is a comprehensive set of ideas and concrete policy proposals to get America out of Iraq quickly, safely, and responsibly. It draws heavily from the mostly ignored Iraq Study Group Report and it points to specific bills in Congress that can be passed today to end the war in the right way.

"The Responsible Plan To End The War In Iraq" is not only good policy, it's good strategy too. With 10 candidates all signed on to one specific plan (and hopefully with more to come), you have the beginnings of a real anti-war voting block in Congress. If these members get elected while promoting this plan vocally and visibly, they will have an unimpeachable mandate when they get to Washington. Because this plan involves more than one candidate, there will be stronger pressure not to cave or compromise when the tough votes come up on the floor.

So far, no Senate candidates have endorsed this plan. I think Rick Noriega should be the first. Why? Because he already has in so many words. This is what Rick says on his website about Iraq:

Rick is running for Senate to responsibly end the war and bring our troops safely home, with a phased military re-deployment that responsibly extracts our forces from Iraq’s civil wars, and brings home the funding spent on the war to invest in education and health care.

This is the Plan’s mission, too:

The U.S. does not have enough troops to remain in Iraq at the current levels indefinitely. The limitations on troop availability will demand some drawdown in the short term.29 While the current administration and its allies may seek to portray a return pre-surge troop levels as the beginning of a military withdrawal, it is not enough to reduce troop levels to pre-surge levels. We must end the presence in Iraq of U.S. troops.

This should be accomplished based on planning provided by our military leadership; the safety of our remaining troops during the drawdown period is of utmost importance. Moreover, the drawdown of troops must be coordinated  with increased civil and economic assistance, and executed in such a way as to contain the threat of terrorism and prevent an abrupt destabilization of the region.

Noriega has endorsed, in his own words, many key points of the Plan. The Plan places a high premium on nation-building and diplomacy, especially dialouge with Iraq’s neighbors, to help end the war. Noriega believes in diplomacy too:

The past eight years of foreign policy has demonstrated that isolationist approaches are really not productive, even with international bad actors like Syria and Iran. We need to recommit ourselves to diplomacy. I support the bipartisan Iraq Study Group’s view that we need to engage our adversaries in aggressive diplomatic efforts to resolves conflicts and differences. Diminishing the United States as an international influence has not been productive in terms of the state of the world.

The Plan also includes numerous proposals to help prevent “future Iraqs” from ever happening again. These proposals include restoring habeas corpus and supporting our troops with adequate veterans programs, two things Noriega slammed his opponent John Cornyn on:

“Yesterday, [John Cornyn] voted against restoring the Constitution’s basic right of habeas corpus. Yesterday, he voted against the Webb-Hagel amendment, legislation that would have provided a safety net for our troops, requiring that they spend as much time at home with their families as they spend deployed in Iraq or Afghanistan. And today? He’s wasting the Senate’s and the people’s time by introducing a resolution about MoveOn.org’s ad!

Here is Noriega again, championing veteran’s healthcare and responsible redeployment, two things at the heart of the Plan:

While I have sacrificed, Cornyn rejected responsible troop deployment limits, twice voted against increased funding for veteran health care, against funding for armored vehicles, and against protecting soldiers’ civilian salaries while they’re serving in Iraq.

The Plan calls for an end to warrantless wiretapping, something Noriega had a particularly strong statement on:

On Christmas morning 2004, outside of Kabul, Afghanistan, my buddies and I drove to our base camp to use the computers. We wanted to be with our kids when they woke up that Christmas. To get there we drove through a near ambush-anytime we drove on the Jalalabad Road, it was risky, and we had an incident on our way.

That Christmas morning, I suspect the government listened to our conversations. They occurred between two countries; Afghanistan and the US. They probably didn't realize the difference in tone in my voice as I spoke to my wife and children that morning as my heart raced still from our encounter on the road. My wife did.

I fought to defend our country and our constitution in Afghanistan. I fought for the right to privacy for every Texan. Mr. Cornyn must now stand up for the privacy of every Texan and American too. We as a nation cannot grant anyone sweeping amnesty if they violated the law.

Americans understand the need for safety and the need for intelligence gathering. What they will not accept is an abuse of power, of crossing the line on American's privacy.

I would join Sen. Dodd in opposition to any retroactive provisions that allow a "get out of jail card" for violating the Constitution. If Mr. Cornyn had ever had the opportunity to have his Christmas conversation listened to by the government, on a day that he feared for his life in a convoy on Jalalabad Road, he would do the same."

Lastly, the Plan calls for a new clean energy economy to replace our dependence on foreign oil. This is something Noriega has called for as well:

Moreover, a national clean energy initiative would provide an immense new number of jobs and economic development that would rival the technology boom of the recent past.

This Plan is good policy, and the more candidates that sign on, the more powerful the mandate. Rick Noriega has already endorsed this plan in so many words. He should be the first Senate candidate to join this initiative.

If you agree, email his campaign. Tell him to formally endorse “The Responsible Plan To End The War In Iraq.”

(originally posted at The Seminal)

ADVERTISEMENT
Tags: , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Responsible Plan? (1.00 / 1)
I would rather he support a plan to win the war, not just to end it. This "anti-war" voting block will get nowhere. They will not get a majority to support a plan to end the war - Americans want to win. Perhaps the Democrats need to start using that language instead of constant defeatist rhetoric. They look silly now that the surge has largely worked militarily. They find themselves in a place where they are almost wishing it would fail so that they can gain politically.  

I think you're going to have to define "win" (0.00 / 0)
What would "winning" the war in Iraq look like? As far as I'm concerned, we've already won. The military operation 5 years ago was amazingly successful. Now, we are facing a situation with no military solution. The war is over. We militarily won, but that's not enough.

[ Parent ]
Ok - here is "win" defined (0.00 / 0)
 The key to winning the war against Islamic extremism is when Arab society rejects Al Qaeda. In Iraq, that is when Sunnis turn against Al Qaeda (which is happening) which in turn will help Sunnis, Shias and Kurds reconcile. This may not happen overnight but this is a worthy goal which will have lasting consequences benefiting the entire Middle East, the world and America. Wars don't end without some type of a political agreement. Why is that considered so impossible in Iraq?  

[ Parent ]
win? (0.00 / 0)
which in turn will help Sunnis, Shias and Kurds reconcile.

History will tell you that the divide between the Shia and Sunnies have existed since the prophet Muhammad left the earth  'on the dome of the rock.' That dates back to 632 A.D.

If 'winning' the war in Iraq has anything to do with bringing the Sunni and Shia together...you can forget about a win.

Iran is Shia country...It has been since the last rightful caliph, Ali. I encourage you to learn more about region and what it means to be a sunni or shia before you say,

This may not happen overnight but this is a worthy goal which will have lasting consequences benefiting the entire Middle East, the world and America.

Attacking the problem in Iraq plays no roll in Shia country...which has always been Iran.

 


[ Parent ]
I don't need a history lesson (0.00 / 0)
I have spent lots of time in the middle east and have many friends that give me firsthand accounts of what is happening - I know the difference between the two.
I don't understand your statement "Attacking the problem in Iraq plays no roll(?) in Shia country...which has always been Iran." What do you mean by that?
Having the Sunnis turn against Al Qaeda is instrumental in helping the Sunnis and Shias in Iraq reconcile - meaning living together in peace again. Al Qaeda is mainly responsible for the attacks against Shias in order to stir sectarian differences. With Al Qaeda rejected, Sunnis and Shias can embark on this road.
Iran's role is funneling money and arms to Shia militias in Iraq but to assume that Shias in Iraq somehow want to be under the control of Iran ignores the history of animosity between Arab and Persian culture. The majority of Iraq's Shias have demonstrated over and over that they do no want to be ruled by Iranian Shias.


[ Parent ]
sunni v. shia (0.00 / 0)
Having the Sunnis turn against Al Qaeda is instrumental in helping the Sunnis and Shias in Iraq reconcile

History will tell you....there is no such thing as a reconciliation between the sunni and shia. The conflict dates back to 632 A.D. after Mohammad died. The conflict also plays a huge roll in Lebanon.  

What does the conflict in Iraq between the Sunni and Shia have to do with the split in Lebanon, Iran, Saudi Arabia, and the rest of the middle east?

You are some how assuming that the war in Iraq is bringing the sunni and shia together, which constitutes a 'win' by the U.S. and is better for the entire middle east. This kind opinion ignores the entire history of the middle east and the split between these two factions.


Iran's role is funneling money and arms to Shia militias in Iraq

Iran funnels $ and arms to Shia in other countries besides Iraq. I'm sure Israel can tell you about that problem. They've felt shia influence form Lebanon for decades.

Honestly, I can write about the middle east all night long...but I dont have time for that.  


[ Parent ]
Rating of 1? (0.00 / 0)
Mr Glazer - how is this post "inappropriate, lacking content or analysis, or unnecessarily abrasive?"  

[ Parent ]
you missed it (0.00 / 0)
the '1' ranking was changed to "OMG, Plz stop w/teh stupid!!1"

[ Parent ]
Clearly lacks content (0.00 / 0)
...and I tend to down rate trolls.  No reason you should have the power to hide people's comments.  I also think your are using Republican talking points because the war ended when Bush declared "Mission Accomplished" at this point we are either in a "surge" or a occupation.

In either case, language like, "the democrats..." and "They find themselves in a place where they are almost wishing it would fail so that they can gain politically." Shows a lack of being part of the party and part of the solution.  

So, please, "OMG, Plz stop w/teh stupid!!1" I am the guy who has to read all the comments and journals, so take the teh stupid!!1 somewhere else.

Help build a progressive movement in Texas. Join Progress Texas.


[ Parent ]
Incredible (1.00 / 1)
I am not using GOP talking points. What I have learned is that there is no respect on this blog for viewpoints that differ from the blog editors' viewpoints. Using words like "the democrats..." and "They find themselves in a place where they are almost wishing it would fail so that they can gain politically." is perfectly within the realm of opinion that should be respected. But your lack of respect shows that you are almost Stalinist in your censorship.

[ Parent ]
How does a one rating ... (0.00 / 0)
constitute nearly Stalinist censorship?

OMG, Plz stop w/teh censorship!!!1


[ Parent ]
One (0.00 / 0)
I would call the characterization that Dem's

where they are almost wishing it would fail so that they can gain politically.

Would fall under "unnecessarily abrasive" and fighting words, myself.  Why the blank do you not understand that we knew the war was wrong, we fought it, lost, but keep fighting it.   The war in Iraq is the wrong answer for the problems in Iraq.

There are Generals on the panel that wrote "Responsible Plan", are you calling them out as well for wishing the war goes badly?


Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On the Go: Mobile App

Upcoming BOR Events

"Do I Look Illegal?"
Arizona GOP Debate Watch

Wednesday, February 22
6:00-9:00 p.m.
Angie's Restaurant
1307 E. 7th Street
RSVP on Facebook

Save The Date:
Super Tuesday Super Watch Party!
Tuesday, March 6
6:00-10:00 p.m.
Scholz Garten
1607 San Jacinto



Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Grading Texas
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox