Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Don't Suppress the Vote in Texas


by: sonia

Sat Apr 14, 2007 at 10:04 PM CDT


( - promoted by Matt Glazer)

Texas is one of several states subject to the Voter Rights Act Section 5 pre-clearance whereby election practices or procedures are frozen until the new proposed procedures have been subjected to review by the US Department of Justice.  You wouldn't be too surprised by our state neighbors in the VRA Section 5 pool. You also wouldn't be too surprised that under the Bush administration DOJ pre-clearance has been relatively easy.


LA Times 3/25/2007
Justice Department tugged to the right
Under Bush, the department has been tainted by politics, many say.

(snip)
The Civil Rights Division veterans focused their criticism on major voting case decisions over the last six years that they say have generally benefited the GOP.
The most recent case concerned a 2005 Georgia law that required voters to provide photo identification. Staff attorneys raised concerns about the law after the Georgia secretary of state supplied data showing that tens of thousands of voters might not have driver's licenses or other prescribed forms of identification. They said the plan could effectively disenfranchise large numbers of black voters.

ADVERTISEMENT

On Tuesday April 17th, the Texas Legislature will vote on two House bills HB218 and HB626 that will likely suppress the vote in Texas if they become law and are implemented.

NY Times article 2/21/07
Lower Voter Turnout Is Seen In States That Require ID
States that imposed identification requirements on voters reduced turnout at the polls in the 2004 presidential election by about 3 percent, and by two to three times as much for minorities, new research suggests.

HB218 by Representative Betty Brown, requires voters to provide redundant forms of identification.  A voter must present a voter registration card and a photo ID, or a voter registration card and at least two other forms of non-photo ID.  Voters who do not have the required forms of ID and show up to the polls will be required to cast a provisional ballot.  There are no mandates in the bill for voter education or notification of the change in the voting law.  Provisional ballots in Texas are already counted at a very low rate.  In the 2004 Presidential race of the 36,193 ballots cast provisionally, only 7,770, less than a quarter of them, were ultimately counted. A survey by the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law found that as many as 11 percent of Americans, more than 21 million citizens, did not have a current government-issued photo ID.

HB626 by Phil King,  is a proof of citizenship to register to vote bill.  His bill requires that all voter registrations must include proof of citizenship.  Only three documents will satisfy the proof of citizen requirement:

  • a certified copy of a birth certificate

  • certified copy of a valid passport

  • certified copy of citizenship naturalization papers

This bill will effectively kill voter registration drives.  No one carries these important papers on their person. And they will be unlikely to trust handing the documents to volunteers conducting registration drives.  Therefore, the only way a new voter can register to vote is through the mail, if the person includes a certified copy of one of those documents.  Or if they go down to their local county registrar's office in person with their papers.

Consider that anytime a person moves from one county to another within the state, they have to re-register and this whole process will have to be repeated again.

Both of the Texas House bills are modeled after Proposition 200 in Arizona which passed in 2004, was temporarily suspended by the Federal Ninth Circuit court and reinstated by the US Supreme Court. An appeal is in the courts.

Proposition 200 implemented harsh voter identification requirements as well as proof-of-citizenship requirements in 2005. The law requires voters who cast a ballot at a polling place on Election Day to present photo identification deemed "acceptable" by Arizona's Secretary of State, such as a driver's license, or two alternate forms of ID that include the name or address of the voter such as a utility bill or a bank statement. Such requirements can disenfranchise voters without photo ID by making it hard for them to cast ballots if they live at a residence where someone else, such as a spouse, parent, or roommate pays the bills, or if they are uninformed about the rules. Students, the poor, and senior citizens are among the groups that are most likely to be adversely affected.
Source: People for the American Way.

The bill analysis for Representative Phil King's bill, HB626 states:

While there is no evidence of extensive fraud in Texas elections or of multiple voting, both can occur and it could affect the outcome of close elections.

There have been over twenty million votes cast in Texas since 2002 in various statewide elections, and not one single case of voter impersonation has been prosecuted by the Texas Attorney General. Proponents of these laws insist that election fraud is rampant and that the purity of the ballot box is being threatened, but they can only provide anecdotal evidence of this. Turnout in the state of Texas is already pretty anemic.  Only 34% of the registered voters in Texas turned out for the last gubernatorial election in November of 2006.
Source: Texas Secretary of State Turnout and Voter Registration Figures (1970-current)

There are two ways to win an election. One is to get a majority of voters to support you. The other is to prevent voters who oppose you from casting their votes.
Source: People for the American Way Report; The New Face of Jim Crow: Voter Suppression in America

Further reading on election fraud:

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Give 'em hell, Sonia (5.00 / 2)
Texas is sure lucky to have you.

Voter ID, Real ID (5.00 / 2)
http://capitolannex....

The battle over Voter ID will hit the House floor on Tuesday. I've heard rumblings that there is enough of a bi-partisan coalition put together to send the bills (HBs 218 and 626) down in flames.

Even so, that doesn't negate the need for activism to ensure that these bills meet the floor death they so richly deserve.

http://gritsforbreak...
Monday, April 16, 2007

Texas likely to join list of states rejecting REAL ID Act

Judging by this week's House Defense Affairs Committee agendas, Texas won't be implementing the REAL ID Act this year because legislators don't want to fork over for the unfunded mandate. On Tuesday the committee will consider a resolution by Chairman Frank Corte requesting that Congress pay for the REAL ID Act if they want Texas to participate, and on Thursday they'll hear another by Carl Isett related to "refusing to implement the REAL ID Act of 2005."

snip

But cost isn't the only reason cited in Isett's resolution for Texas' refusal to implement REAL ID:

In addition to unease about expense, provisions of the REAL ID Act raise concerns about data security and possible identity theft; the act requires statewide databases to be integrated and shared with the federal government, but does not establish clear security standards for the network nor designate an entity to control access to the system; and

  WHEREAS, These ambiguities in the legislation make it more likely that information about a driver's license or ID card holder could be illegally accessed through another state's less secure system, creating a vulnerability where none currently exists and increasing the likelihood of the very threat the program was designed to minimize

snip

Howver, the new data gathered because of Corte's changes last session has already been used by Governor Perry's Texas Fusion Center in ways that were never discussed during the legislative process. That episode was cause enough for me to oppose any future sharing of driver data until we rein in past abuses, so I'm glad to see Texas opt out of the REAL ID mess.

http://gritsforbreak...

Thursday, November 03, 2005

Biometrics slope got slippery awfully quick

Just two months after HB 2337 took effect allowing the Texas Department of Public Safety to gather drivers' biometric information and removing judicial oversight of its use, Governor Perry let the other shoe drop. The Dallas News reported yesterday (Exclusive: State homeland plan links data," Nov. 2):...

Ironically, a system touted as a tool to catch people with fake IDs could have the opposite effect if personal information of drivers gets out. "This new system is an identity thief's dream come true," said Ann del Llano of the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas. "Now any good identity thief in the world has a new database that's going to be one of the largest databases that exists."

snip

When Texas passed HB 2337 I asked, "Where are the small government conservatives?" I still want to know. For whatever reason, very few of them seem to make it through the GOP primary process into state government. Instead we get Big Brother's handmaidens, like Rick Perry and Frank Corte.



Voter's Rights: Halt Holt's HR 811 which can put the EAC, full of Bush's partisan appointees, in charge of 2008 elections (0.00 / 0)
Also important to Voting Rights:
From Election Defense Alliance: ACTION Needed NOW:

Halt Holt's HR 811

Prior to Spring recess, the HCA was trying to "fast track" H.R. 811.
An unprecedented outpouring of citizen protest stopped them in their tracks.

Keep FAXING and pouring it on until Congress gets the message:

END the EAC
(Keep the unitary executive OUT of elections)

BAN DREs
(The Holt bill supports them)

END SECRET COUNTS
(Currently 85+% of our votes are counted in secret, with no citizen oversight)

From: Election Defense Alliance An ACTION Page:
Copy and Forward this Page Widely with this Link:
Halt Holt's HR 811

.............

Perhaps the leadership of MoveOn, PFAW, and Common Cause are still offering their support for Holt's flawed bill, despite their membership's preferences, because they are waiting for the Senate to act first:

Feinstein Asks for All EAC Communications Processes concerning Voter Fraud

Today Senator Robert Menendez (D-NJ) sent a letter to Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA), Chairwoman of the Senate Rules and Administration Committee, which has oversight over the EAC, "expressing his concern over the revelations and asking her to examine the process by which the EAC report was produced. Menendez maintains that the use of the EAC to advance a political agenda is a blow to the integrity of the electoral system and that an investigation into the motivations behind the panel's report is warranted."

snip

LATE UPDATE: Feinstein sends letter of inquiry on these matters to EAC, demanding all communications and processes leading to the alteration and/or hiding of both the EAC's "Voter Fraud" report and the report showing that Voter ID laws depress voter turnout.

......................


[ Parent ]
We got a small reprieve today (0.00 / 0)
Both bills were found to have points of order and were pulled by the authors and sent back to Elections Committee.  Elections Committee met upon adjournment, corrected the error and voted them back out on a party line.  Both bills are now headed to Calendars once again. We expect them to be rushed through that process as well.

They may be back as early as Thursday or they may be scheduled for Monday.


Fantasy of Fraud (0.00 / 0)
NY Times Editorial April 15, 2007
The Fantasy Behind the Scandal

The more we learn about the White House's purge of United States attorneys, the more a single thread runs through it: the Bush administration's campaign to transform the minor problem of voter fraud into a supposed national scourge.

When the public first learned about the firing of eight United States attorneys, administration officials piously declared that many of the prosecutors had ill served the public by failing to aggressively pursue voter fraud cases (against Democrats, naturally). But the more we examine this issue, the more ludicrous those claims seem.

Last week, we learned that the administration edited a government-ordered report on voter fraud to support its fantasy. The original version concluded that among experts "there is widespread but not unanimous agreement that there is little polling place fraud." But the publicly released version said, "There is a great deal of debate on the pervasiveness of fraud." It's hard to see that as anything but a deliberate effort to mislead the public.

(snip)
It's obvious why the Bush administration would edit those documents, but why the voting report? Because charges of voter fraud are a key component of the Republican electoral strategy. If the public believes there are rampant efforts to vote fraudulently, or to register voters improperly, it increases support for measures like special voter ID's, which work against the poor, the elderly, minorities and other disenfranchised groups that tend to support Democrats. Claims of rampant voter fraud also give the administration an excuse to cut back prosecutions of the real problem: officials who block voters' access to the polls.

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain.


Note to Sonia (0.00 / 0)
Based on what I see in this section of commentary, I believe you are indeed interested in electoral integrity. That said, I'd like to ask a favor of you. Please visit, or re-visit, the section elsewhere devoted to HB3118 and set in motion by Mr. Maxey. A few moments ago my posting was the last item in a long series of remarks about the bill. Please read it. I became so vexed by what I read there, that I felt compelled to chime in; something I've never done. Since then, it has become apparent that the conversation ended shortly before I got there, or perhaps the participants were disbelieving of my contribution. I find this frustrating.

Everybody seems to be missing the point of the bill, and the bill is something that has been desperately needed in the Texas election code for as long as I can remember, which is a very very long time. It should not be allowed to die in committee. I am banking on an impression that you can reach other young folks who have the time and ability to take a fight to the legislature, perhaps making the passage of this bill a part of what you're already doing, provided you understand its implications. If you read my remarks in the other section, I'm sure you will.

Party raiding has made a big comeback lately. It is the reason why you're now faced with a very difficult task in unseating John Cornyn, a despicable Bush acolyte who would otherwise never have been elected. Crossover raids will only get worse in the future if not checked by this legislation.

The only thing wrong with HB3118 is that it elevates crossover voting from a class B misdemeanor to a felony, which is ridiculous given the basic practicalities of the bill. That part should be changed.

I'm too old to get out and make a fight of it, and all my allies are either long dead or in worse shape than me. All I can do anymore is try to share my experience and insights while I'm still able to.

Please acknowledge this message.

***Poll Catt*** 

Seen It All; Done Most Of It


I couldn't find the thread (0.00 / 0)
Can you post what thread the HB3118 is being discussed on.  I tried a search for that number and nothing came up on BOR.  Maybe the thread doesn't have that tag?

[ Parent ]
Nevermind I found it (0.00 / 0)
No Fireworks on the Closed Primary / Pure Party Primary Bill 

Wow that's a long thread, lots of discussion.


[ Parent ]
Reply by Sonia (0.00 / 0)
Thank you for taking the time to look at the remarks.

***poll catt***

Seen It All; Done Most Of It


Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On the Go: Mobile App

Upcoming BOR Events

"Do I Look Illegal?"
Arizona GOP Debate Watch

Wednesday, February 22
6:00-9:00 p.m.
Angie's Restaurant
1307 E. 7th Street
RSVP on Facebook

Save The Date:
Super Tuesday Super Watch Party!
Tuesday, March 6
6:00-10:00 p.m.
Scholz Garten
1607 San Jacinto



Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Best of Texas Left
- (Complete Directory)
- B & B
- Bay Area Houston
- Blue Bloggin
- Bluedaze
- Brains and Eggs
- Capitol Annex
- Collin County Democrats
- Collin County Observer
- Community Forum
- Dog Canyon
- Dos Centavos
- Easter Lemming Liberal
- Eye on Williamson County
- Feet to the Fire
- Grading Texas
- Greg's Opinion
- Grits for Breakfast
- Half Empty
- Houtopia
- In the Pink Texas
- Kiss My Big Blue Butt
- Letters from Texas
- McBlogger
- Mean Rachel
- Musings
- North Texas Liberal
- Off the Kuff
- Panhandle Truth Squad
- Para Justicia y Libertad!
- Pink Dome
- San Antonio Mayor
- South Texas Chisme
- StoudDemBlog
- Texas Clover Leaf
- Texas Kaos
- The Caucus Blog
- There..Already
- Three Wise Men
Best of Texas Right
- Blogs of War
- BlogHouston
- Boots and Sabers
- Lone Star Times
- Publius TX
- Rick Perry vs the World
- Safety for Dummies
- Slightly Rough
- Urban Grounds
Other Texas Reads
- Burka Blog
- D Magazine
- DOT Show
- Statesman Elections
- Strong Political Analysis
- Texas Monthly
- Texas Observer
- The Texas Blue
- Quorum Report Daily Buzz
Around Austin
- Austin Bloggers
- Austin Chronicle
- Austin Contrarian
- Austin Metblogs
- Austin on Two Wheels
- Austin Real Estate Blog
- Austin Statesman
- Austin Texas Bike Shit Stuff
- Austin Towers
- Austinist
- Capital MetroBlog
- Daily Texan
- Do512
- Downtown Austin Blog
- East Austinite
- Elise Hu
-
Flash Mob Austin
- Keep Austin Blue
- M1EK
- Travis County Democrats
- University Democrats
TX Progressive Orgs
- ACLU Legislative Blog
- Atticus Circle
- Criminal Justice Coalition
- Equality Texas
- NOW Texas
- PFAW Texas
- Public Citizen
- SEIU Texas
- Tejano Insider
- Texas AFT
- Texas HDCC
- Texas Watch
- TFN
- TSTA
- TSEU
- Texas Young Democrats
- United Ways of Texas
TX Elections/Returns
- TX Returns 1992-present
- TX Media/Candidate List

- Bexar County
- Collin County
- Dallas county
- Denton County
- El Paso County
- Fort Bend County
- Harris County
- Jefferson County
- Tarrant County
- Travis County

- CNN 1998 Returns
- CNN 2000 Returns
- CNN 2002 Returns
- CNN 2004 Returns
- CNN 2006 Returns
- CNN 2008 Returns
Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox