- About Us
- Community Guidelines

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR


We're Counting On You.

Burnt Orange Report is redeveloping our website for the first time in almost a decade.

We're counting on your support to continue providing you free and frequent coverage of progressive issues that matter to Texans.

Help us build a website that is as great as the content we publish on it.

Texas Republican Party Platform Rejects Family Values and Right to Life

by: Genevieve Cato

Mon Jun 09, 2014 at 01:30 PM CDT

The Texas Republican Party's Platform is a document that can generally be counted on to shock Texans and those watching across the nation. The platform coming out of the 2014 Texas Republican Party Convention does not disappoint.

Nestled among commitments to restrict and revoke the rights of all kinds of different Americans is a clear message: the Texas GOP doesn't want anyone telling them what to do, especially not scary international organizations like the United Nations, and most definitely when it comes to the rights of children and families as outlined in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.

More on the UN's presence on the GOP platform below the jump.

The Republican Party calls on the United States to withdraw from the United Nations entirely, so one has to assume that the GOP doesn't want the United States to continue to hold the power to check the actions of countries like China and Russia on the Security Council. Maintaining one-fifth of the decision-making power on the only body with the ability to create sanctions or call for U.N. troop involvement in conflicts around the world is clearly not on the top of the Republican Party's interests.

Another United Nations - focused plank of the platform is slightly more surprising: the rejection of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. Of course, the Republican Party of Texas is just staying true to their opposition to letting an international organization tell Texas or the United States what to do. The contents of the Convention on the Rights of the Child is so egregiously counter to GOP ideology and values that needed to be specifically targeted in the current platform.

The Convention on the Rights of the Child requires signing countries to recognize certain integral rights of children, including:

{Recognizing that] the child, by reason of his physical and mental immaturity, needs special safeguards and care, including appropriate legal protection, before as well as after birth.

As well as:

Convinced that the family, as the fundamental group of society and the natural environment for the growth and well-being of all its members and particularly children, should be afforded the necessary protection and assistance so that it can fully assume its responsibilities within the community, [and] recognizing that the child, for the full and harmonious development of his or her personality, should grow up in a family environment, in an atmosphere of happiness, love and understanding.

The root of GOP opposition to this document is clear: dedication to protecting a child's right to life before and after birth and support for family structures is completely counter to Republican rhetoric. Though that might sound ridiculous, in truth the Convention on the Rights of the Child requires a far more holistic commitment to a quality of life for children and families than the GOP has ever supported.

The GOP has proven that it is not interested in securing the well-being of Texas children and families. Their interest in preserving the lives of children is limited to conversations about restricting reproductive rights and nothing more. Should they ever decide to change their tune, they ought to consider the UN document as a great place to start.  

Copyright Burnt Orange Report, all rights reserved.
Do not republish without express written permission.

Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

The UN is NOT our governing body (0.00 / 0)
This document is not about empowering the family - it's about governing the family. Children do not belong to the state. We don't need a seat at an international body to "check" anyone. The United States Congress makes that call.

The constitution does not permit the delegation of congressional duties to international bodies. Seeing as to how not one instance of UN sanctioning or UN troop involvement resulted in anything good, this was great foresight on the part of our Founding Fathers.

It's scary that we have been so subverted into not only accepting, but advocating for surrendering American sovereignty to global governance...and that the idea is celebrated openly.

Amazon Referrals
Buying Back-to-School Books?

Use BOR's Amazon Referral and we'll receive a share of your purchase, at no cost to you!

Click here to shop.

Connect With BOR

2014 Texas Elections
Follow BOR for who's in, who's out, and who's up.

Candidate Tracker:
-- Statewide Races
-- Congressional Races
-- State Senate Races
-- State Rep. Races
-- SBOE Races
-- Austin City Council

Click here for all 2014 Elections coverage


Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

Texas Blue Pages

Texas Blue Pages
A career network for progressives.


Shared On Facebook

Burnt Orange Reporters
Editor and Publisher:
Katherine Haenschen

Senior Staff Writers:
Genevieve Cato
Joe Deshotel
Ben Sherman

Staff Writers:
Omar Araiza
Emily Cadik
Phillip Martin
Natalie San Luis
Katie Singh
Joseph Vogas

Byron LaMasters

Blogger Emeritus:
Karl-Thomas Musselman

Read staff bios here.

Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings

Powered by: SoapBlox