- About Us
- Community Guidelines

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR


We're Counting On You.

Burnt Orange Report is redeveloping our website for the first time in almost a decade.

We're counting on your support to continue providing you free and frequent coverage of progressive issues that matter to Texans.

Help us build a website that is as great as the content we publish on it.

Republicans May Have to Stop Trying to Repeal the Affordable Care Act

by: Emily Cadik

Tue May 20, 2014 at 02:00 PM CDT

By now even diehard opponents of the Affordable Care Act are growing to accept that enrollment numbers have far exceeded expectations, and that taking on the President and his signature health law will require a new strategy. And for the first time in years, that strategy may not involve calls for repeal.

The possibility that Republicans may abandon the repeal-or-nothing approach is not founded in any acceptance that the ACA has provided health insurance to 8 million Americans through the federal exchange and millions more through Medicaid - it's about polling.

Recent polls suggests that as the ACA has become more popular nationwide, and especially in Republican districts, there may be less for Republicans to gain by sticking to their usual obstructionist strategy. Instead, they might actually have to offer ways to improve it.

Read why after the jump.

The ACA is actually becoming more popular in red districts around the country. A recent poll from Democracy Corps found that 52 percent of respondents in battleground districts wanted to "implement and fix" the ACA, while 42 percent wanted to "repeal and replace" it. In December, the numbers were 49 and 45 percent respectively. In Republican districts, 43 percent of respondents say the ACA "goes too far," down from 48 percent in December. And Democratic districts are heading towards majority-support status for the first time, suggesting that Democrats may be less inclined to run away from the law in campaigns than they once were.

A new Politico poll which "spells danger for Democrats" also finds that "even among likely voters in the competitive races, keep/modify polls slightly better than repeal." Oddly enough, while the ACA will likely hurt Democrats in the midterms, attempts to repeal the law may also hurt Republicans. A prominent Republican pollster has gone so far as to predict that Republicans will fundamentally shift how they talk about the ACA. "After the primaries, expect a shift in Republican candidates' rhetoric against Obamacare," said Bill McInturff of Public Opinion Strategies. "Only few want to repeal the law; most want to fix and keep it."

Though the polls point to gradual acceptance and growing support of the ACA, perceptions of the law are still largely colored by the tainted "Obamacare" brand, which may take years to improve. A recent poll in Kentucky found that voters were much less likely to support the ACA when it was referred to as "Obamacare" than when asked about its individual components. When Kentucky voters were asked about kynect, the state health insurance exchange, 29 percent had a favorable impression, 22 percent had an unfavorable one, and most didn't know or weren't sure. Meanwhile, 57 percent had unfavorable views of Obamacare, compared to 33 percent who had favorable impressions. One of the pollsters explained, "Call it something else, and the negatives drop."

We can still expect quite a bit of anti-Obamacare rhetoric leading into the midterm elections. But for perhaps the first time, the opposition may have to be more qualified, nuanced and constructive.  

Copyright Burnt Orange Report, all rights reserved.
Do not republish without express written permission.

Tags: , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

. (0.00 / 0)

No slant, just truth. This is from an FOIA request concerning the rollout of healthcare.gov. You really believe those non-verifiable fantasy Obama numbers this administration gives you after looking at those official documents?

If 8 million people really were enrolled, and paying, do you think we'd need to file FOIA requests to get something as simple as ENROLLMENT numbers? Congress can't even get them. You believe the federal government is able to run the nation's healthcare, 1/6th of the economy, yet they can't even keep track of their own numbers to account for how they're going to provide everyone healthcare.

This 8 million number is nothing but garbage until someone pulls enough teeth to see it in writing. In 6 months, after elections and an FOIA is granted for today's numbers, we'll see how many people are actually paying into this disaster. I'll wager it's under 2 million.

but . . but . . . (0.00 / 0)
Obama says the ACA debate is over.
Don't you know he hates Judicial Watch. Thank you for doing more research than the posters, i.e. most recent White House twitter post.

[ Parent ]
. (0.00 / 0)
1 enrollment on Day 1...Jesus Christ.

As of October 31, 2013, there were 1,319,425 accounts created nationwide - but only 30,512 actual enrollments in Obamacare.

Contrast with the HHS report here http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/... , which says that "106,185 Americans selected health plans in first reporting period of open enrollment" while highlighting other useless numbers like accounts created.

These people are all criminal and full of it. How else can this be made clear besides in black and white, as above? The D's next to their names don't make this okay

i wonder (0.00 / 0)
If those that are liking ACA are paying attention to access to care at the VA the other govt run healthcare system. I'm sure they are oblivious to the soon to be 1,000,000,000,000 bailout of insurance industry so they won't raise rates. Debt neutral? Keep touting numbers that you can't confirm.

Amazon Referrals
Buying Back-to-School Books?

Use BOR's Amazon Referral and we'll receive a share of your purchase, at no cost to you!

Click here to shop.

Connect With BOR

2014 Texas Elections
Follow BOR for who's in, who's out, and who's up.

Candidate Tracker:
-- Statewide Races
-- Congressional Races
-- State Senate Races
-- State Rep. Races
-- SBOE Races
-- Austin City Council

Click here for all 2014 Elections coverage


Make a New Account



Forget your username or password?

Texas Blue Pages

Texas Blue Pages
A career network for progressives.


Shared On Facebook

Burnt Orange Reporters
Editor and Publisher:
Katherine Haenschen

Senior Staff Writers:
Genevieve Cato
Joe Deshotel
Ben Sherman

Staff Writers:
Omar Araiza
Emily Cadik
Phillip Martin
Natalie San Luis
Katie Singh
Joseph Vogas

Byron LaMasters

Blogger Emeritus:
Karl-Thomas Musselman

Read staff bios here.

Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings

Powered by: SoapBlox