| Last August the governor issued an executive order requiring that public schools spend sixty-five percent of all funds on "in the classroom" expenses. The plan isn't anything more than a stalking horse for vouchers, which is why I was surprised to read a headline today that the Texas Education Agency was reversing some of the most egregious elements of the plan. ("Libraries, counselors and nurses to count as instructional expenses in 65 percent plan"). Then I read the story:
Rules released Friday by the Texas Education Agency split in half a new requirement that schools spend 65 percent of their budget on instruction.
One part, to be phased in over three years, follows the U.S. Department of Education's definition of instructional spending, which does not include money spent on nurses, counselors or libraries.
The other part, effective this coming school year, includes spending on nurses, counselors and libraries among instructional expenses.
The result is that there will be two standards to define instructional spending. Schools will be expected to put 65 percent of their money toward instruction under both definitions within three years.
Both rules will be part of a larger rating system that the state uses to evaluate districts' financial health. Schools that do not meet the 65 percent rule, ordered by Gov. Rick Perry last year, could avoid penalties if they meet other benchmarks.
These rules seem convoluted; does this mean there are two sets of standards, both of which schools should try to reach but that they won't be penalized if they don't meet the more stringent ones? Are the first set temporary, and the latter to be imposed later? And (as the AAS story points out) are sports still being considered as an in-the-classroom expense?
The most basic reading here is that the governor now has the right to say, "We are counting salaries for nurses, counselors and librarians as in-the-classroom expenses," even though in just a few years (after a gubernatorial election, say) they won't be counted. But the TEA ruling still seem hazy. If there's anyone who understands the background here of what these new rules mean, use the comments below to elaborate. |