Home

About
- About Us
- Community Guidelines

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR

Advertisements

Texas Supreme Court OKs Termination of Alleged Prostitute's Parental Rights


by: Edward Garris

Wed Jan 22, 2014 at 01:00 PM CST


The Texas Supreme Court last week held that there was sufficient evidence for an alleged prostitute to lose her parental rights to her daughter.

A trial court had terminated the mother's rights to her daughter; the First Court of Appeals in Houston reversed the termination of her rights, but allowed the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) to keep its appointment as sole managing conservator of the daughter.  The appeals court held that the evidence of "abuse or neglect" against the mother was insufficient to justify terminating her parental rights.

In partially siding with the mother, the Houston appeals court noted the lack of evidence suggesting any injury to the child in question as well as the fact that any other concerns related to another child, and not the for whom parental rights were terminated.

The Texas Supreme Court disagreed with the Houston court's approach.

To see how the abuse of the mother herself factored into the termination of her parental rights, read below the jump.  

ADVERTISEMENT
In summarizing what it felt were the relevant facts, the Texas Supreme Court devoted considerable attention to the fact that the mother was herself a victim of domestic abuse by a male roommate, who another roommate testified was the pimp for both the witness and the mother. Notably, the mother denied these allegations.

A DFPS case worker investigated; her investigation turned up no abuse or neglect of the child at issue, though it did find that around the time that the pimp abused the mother - sending her to the hospital - she had relinquished parental rights to her first child, who had presumably been living with the mother and her abuser.

The Supreme Court went on to use the mother's prior history with her first child to grant DFPS the authority to terminate the rights of the mother, citing, TEX. FAM. CODE § 161.001(1)(O) and a 2013 Texas Supreme Court case:

"[W]hile subsection O requires removal under chapter 262 for abuse or neglect, those words are used broadly. Consistent with chapter 262's removal standards, "abuse or neglect of the child" necessarily includes the risks or threats of the environment in which the child is placed. . . . If a parent has neglected, sexually abused, or otherwise endangered her child's physical health or safety, such that initial and continued removal are appropriate, the child has been "remov[ed] from the parent under Chapter 262 for the abuse or neglect of the child."

The court then broadened the scope of its permissible inquiry to include a parent's treatment of prior children where, as here, there was no history of abuse or neglect with the child at issue.

The case is In the Interest of K.N.D., a Child, 13-0257.



Copyright Burnt Orange Report, all rights reserved.
Do not republish without express written permission.


Tags: (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Connect With BOR
    

2014 Texas Elections
Follow BOR for who's in, who's out, and who's up.

Candidate Tracker:
-- Statewide Races
-- Congressional Races
-- State Senate Races
-- State Rep. Races
-- SBOE Races
-- Austin City Council

Click here for all 2014 Elections coverage

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Texas Blue Pages

Texas Blue Pages
A career network for progressives.

Advertisement

Shared On Facebook

Burnt Orange Reporters
Editor and Publisher:
Katherine Haenschen

Senior Staff Writers:
Genevieve Cato
Joe Deshotel
Michael Hurta
Ben Sherman

Staff Writers:
Omar Araiza
Emily Cadik
Phillip Martin
Natalie San Luis
Katie Singh
Joseph Vogas

Founder:
Byron LaMasters

Blogger Emeritus:
Karl-Thomas Musselman

Read staff bios here.

Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox