Flower Mound Mayor Declares 2014 “Year of the Bible;” City Charter Remains in Effect

0 Flares Filament.io 0 Flares ×

Flower Mound mayor Tom Hayden has declared 2014 the “Year of the Bible.”

As of press time, the Flower Mound City Charter still remained in effect, and trash pick-up schedules were not set to revert to those used in ancient Mesopotamia.

Some Flower Mound residents have taken umbrage with Hayden's proclamation. Resident Curt Orton told the local Fox affiliate, “He was elected mayor, not as the spiritual leader of Flower Mound.”

It is unclear if the transportation and public works departments had a chance to weigh in on Hayden's proclamation, as the mayor has clearly asked for bad weather of truly — I can use this word without hyperbole here — Biblical proportions. Should flooding ensue, it is unclear if the planning and zoning commissions will give permission for the construction of a giant ark within city limits.

Below the jump, find out if shellfish remains legal in Flower Mound, and whether or not the City Charter will soon prohibit coveting thy neighbor's Ford F-150.People are free to worship whatever faith they choose (or none at all) — the First Amendment is delightfully clear on that front. Our very country was founded to give religious liberty to all who seek it.

However, Hayden's proclamation raises concerns for those Flower Mound residents who do not follow the Bible, or choose not to follow his specific interpretation of it. Such statements from public servants made in their official capacity strike me as going against the spirit of the protections provided in our First Amendment.

I can mockingly ask if Hayden will now ban pig products and shellfish, ripped jeans, tattoos, mixed-breed dogs, or shaving one's face in Flower Mound during his Biblical year.

Or, we can raise the question of whether such a move was necessary for strong public policy, or if it might be perceived as exclusionary and detract from the business of government, which — last I checked — was supposed to operate separately from any church or organized religion.

“Ignore the progressive parts, bro. It's cool.”

We should not elect our public servants to promote one religious agenda over another. And while it strikes me that progressives and conservative Christians should be able to find common ground in morals such as caring for the sick, clothing the poor and feeding the hungry, it seems that those who cling most tightly to the Bible in the public sphere also advance policies that go against government practicing most of Jesus's teachings.

What does Hayden hope to gain by declaring 2014 the year of the Bible? Does he mean to follow its words literally, and shape municipal policies in direct accordance with his interpretation of its teaching? Does he mean that we should all carry concern for our fellow citizens in our hearts no matter what our faith (or lack thereof)? Or does he mean to privilege one religion over others and potentially make his own constituents feel uncomfortable or unwelcome in his city?

Whether Hayden intended it or not, it's hard to not to expect the last of those three to be the likely outcome. That's not leadership, and I don't think it's even keeping with the spirit of the First Amendment. All Flower Mound residents should feel welcome, regardless of their religion — and that's exactly the opposite of the sentiment created by declaring 2014 the “year of the Bible.”  


About Author

Katherine Haenschen

Katherine Haenschen is a PhD candidate at the University of Texas, where she studies political participation on digital media. She previously managed successful candidate, issue, voter registration, and GOTV campaigns in Central Texas. She is also a fan of UCONN women's basketball and breakfast tacos.


  1. ScalesOnYourEyes on

    “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.”

    The Bible is not organized religion. Organized religion is preached against many times in it in fact. Declaring a “year of so-and-so Church” or even the “Year of Cristianity” would be respecting the establishment of religion.

    From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S… “Williams was motivated by historical abuse of governmental power, and believed that government must remove itself from anything that touched upon human beings' relationship with God

    There is ample evidence, and even outright claims from the founders, that the God / Creator spoken of in the Constitution is the one of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. We can deduce that the only two writings to support this association are the Torah and the Bible, neither of which are organized/established religions.

    The first amendment allows for the free practice of religion and the prohibition to respecting a specific establishment of religion – not religious writings, nor praying to God. It doesn't prohibit anyone's feelings getting hurt about ANYTHING, nonetheless someone practicing religious teachings (even if their religion is the lack of it), even in government.

    Anyway, from a moderate point of view, I have never seen how this really should be a big deal to anyone of any faith, even as an agnostic leaning towards atheism. Reagan did it nationally in '83 and I'm certain it affected absolutely no one's daily life nor make people who don't follow the teachings of the Bible uncomfortable.

Leave a Reply

2015 © Skytop Publishing All Rights Reserved. Do not republish without express written permission.

Site designed and developed by well + done DESIGN

0 Flares Twitter 0 Facebook 0 Filament.io 0 Flares ×