Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Burnt Orange Report Endorses Adan Ballesteros in Travis Constable 2 Runoff


by: Burnt Orange Report

Sun Jul 22, 2012 at 05:00 PM CDT


Adan Ballesteros is the only real Democrat in the runoff, and is our only chance to hold this seat come November. We endorse him in the runoff for Travis County Constable Precinct 2.

Ballesteros is not without his flaws, but opponent Michael Cargill is so totally, wholly unacceptable that we cannot sit by and let voters accidentally vote for a DINO gun nut here in Travis County.

Make no mistake: Michael Cargill is one of the most unacceptable people to seek nomination on the Democratic ballot in Travis County in a long time. He lobbied on behalf of the NRA in favor of the Guns on Campus bill in the last legislative session. He supports repealing Federal Gun Free School Zones and the Brady Bill, which provides background checks for gun purchases. His entire campaign has at times seemed like a promotional stunt for his concealed handgun licensing business (and no, a solar-powered electric sign outside of your business does not you a Democrat make). Cargill admitted he voted in the 2010 Republican primary for Debra Medina, when many good Democrats in Travis County were running on our primary ballot.

In light of last week's tragic shooting in Aurora, Colorado, Cargill's active support for repealing basic gun control laws is all the more troubling. We do not need peace officers who simply want to arm the citizenry and let everyone shoot it out. Cargill's statements on concealed handguns in college classrooms echo the justifications Republicans are now using in light of the Aurora tragedy -- namely, that if everyone had a gun, we could all just "shoot back." That's a bad policy in a crowded movie theater in the dark, and in a college classroom as innocent people try to flee for their lives. How much collateral damage is Michael Cargill willing to risk so that every gun nut can purchase the automatic weapon of their choice?

Cargill likely only qualified for the run-off thanks to significant outside spending by a Ron Paul-aligned SuperPAC, which flooded the district with misspelled, ugly mailers about Ballesteros in the week leading up to the May 29 primary. Michael Cargill has no business holding elected office as a Democrat, especially not in Travis County, where our constables are often shining examples of progressive law enforcement practices.

It is rumored that Cargill is only running at the behest of Republican JP Glenn Bass, owing to partisan rancor between Bass and Ballesteros. The feud seemingly stems from Ballesteros' work during Travis County redistricting to draw districts that will help us elect Democrats to every JP and Constable district in the county -- and unelect Glenn Bass. Ballesteros walks the walk and works to elect Democrats in northwest Travis County. And last we checked, he never lobbied for policies that make your children more likely to get shot.

Democrats cannot in good conscience vote for Cargill, a candidate for a peace officer position that espouses views on gun control that put him to the right of many moderate Republicans, and would actually make us less safe.

Burnt Orange Report endorses Adan Ballesteros in the Travis County Constable Precinct 2 runoff.

Early Voting in the primary run-off is Monday July 23 through Friday July 27. Election Day is Tuesday, July 31.



Endorsements are made based on a weighted consensus of the staff, which guides the type and tone of endorsement. Members of the Burnt Orange Report staff employed by campaigns abstain from voting on those races.
ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Lowbrow (0.00 / 0)
I must state that this is not my constable race. I am very happy with our Democrat Sally Hernandez running for my precinct. I do not disagree with your endorsement, however, linking Mr. Cargill to the recent horrific shooting in Aurora, CO is disappointing and in poor taste. There are many pro-gun Democrats in Texas. With that said, bringing to light why those voters should chose Adan Ballestaros over Michael Cargill could have been highlighted instead.  

My friend responded (5.00 / 1)
My friend Panika gave a great response that I wanted to share.

"It should be noted, though, as I have many times before Aurora, CO, that Mr. Cargill's stance on guns is not that of a pro-gun Democrat. it's not even that of a moderate Republican. for one, being pro-gun, doesn't automatically make you anti-gun-control.

and his stance on Stand Your Ground is also extremely right wing (another thing that I have said for a while) and, to me, extremely troubling (especially when you consider how many police and sheriff's unions in multiple states and across the political spectrum are opposed to this particular piece of ALEC legislation and their reasons why)."

This is what I was looking for! Thanks Panika!


[ Parent ]
I was going to say... (0.00 / 0)
While there are, indeed, many pro-gun Democrats...there are not any who are THIS pro-gun.

"Let us tenderly and kindly cherish therefore, the means of knowledge. Let us dare to read, think, speak, and write."  -  John Adams

[ Parent ]
Aurora (4.00 / 2)
If we can't talk about these issues when terrible tragedies occur, when can we?

Similarly, it makes no sense to talk about Stand Your Ground outside of the context of the shooting of Trayvon Martin. In a vacuum, away from the context, it's just a philosophy. But our politics have a narrative and that's the only reason we vote, the only reason we work on any issue -- hell, the only reason we care about issues. Aurora and Trayvon Martin are part of it.

Public safety is not Mister Cargill's priority. He has advocated policies that, if implemented and enforced, would lead to more incidents resembling the one in Colorado. Mister Cargill, unfortunately, is much more interested in private, exclusive safety. That's not what the Democratic Party is about.

John Woods


[ Parent ]
burnt orange ostriches (0.00 / 0)
It's too bad that the burnt orange report insists that in order to be a democrat, you have to bury your head in the sand about gun control issues.

If shooting back "is bad policy in a crowded theater in the dark," -- what is good policy?  Getting killed?  Standing there helplessly?

I can tell you one thing.  Anyone that is around firearms regularly would not have thought that a muzzle flash in a movie theater was a "stunt."  That is for damn sure

You don't have to be a gun-phobe to be a democrat.  Period.  You can have common sense.  "single-issue voters" are the problem in this country.  And your "single-issue endorsement" is equally problematic.


Cargill's campaign manager? (0.00 / 0)
This comment looks like it was written by Mike Cargill's campaign manager (not a Democrat at all, if that's true).

"Gun-phobe?" This is exactly the kind of language that prevents us from finding reasonable compromises on gun issues.

John Woods


[ Parent ]
Single issue? (5.00 / 2)
When a candidate's campaign is built around a single issue, and when that candidate is dead wrong on the issue, then there's no reason to support him. Adan Ballesteros brings a checkered past to the race, but he also brings a generally well-respected record as constable. Cargill brings one big negative and (as far as I can tell) nothing positive.

There are plenty of good pro-gun Democrats. (I'm not one of them, but I can find common ground with a lot of them.) If I like somebody's positions on other issues, I can live with a certain level of gun advocacy. But almost by definition, there aren't any good Democrats for whom promoting guns, to an extreme level, is the defining issue of their political lives.

Ballesteros is fit to serve. Cargill isn't.  


[ Parent ]
KXAN News (0.00 / 0)
I saw the news last night, and Cargill seems to be a Class A jerk.  He starts the Cocaine Constable crap and puts out signs, a case that was never proven by the way, and then accused the Constable's office of putting out false allegations?  He said he was fingerprinted and had his picture taken.  The sign said "ARRESTED". What was false about this?  When you have a hot check, you pay if off and it is dismissed.  This is the normal process.  It does not mean that you were innocent, or falsely arrested. All of this to make a Judge happy?  My vote, once again because I was right the first time, it for Ballesteros....

Cargill unethical. (0.00 / 0)
http://www.kxan.com/dpp/news/p...

So cargill has already given three different reasons for taking the signs. Voters beware!  


Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On Tumblr: BOR
On Pinterest:
Rick Perry's Rental Mansion

Need A Vendor?
Check out BOR's Progressive Vendor Page for campaigns and non-profits.


Texas Blue Pages

Texas Blue Pages
A career network for progressives.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Burnt Orange Reporters
Publisher: Karl-Thomas M.
Editor-in-Chief: Katherine H.
Contributor: Phillip M.
Senior Writer: Michael H.
Staff Writer: Ben S.
Staff Writer: Chaille J.
Staff Writer: Edward G.
Staff Writer: Emily C.
Staff Writer: Joe D.
Staff Writer: Nick H.
Staff Writer: Shelby A.
Founder: Byron L.

Read staff bios here.

Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox