Home

About
- About Us
- Community Guidelines

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR

Advertisements


We're Counting On You.

Burnt Orange Report is redeveloping our website for the first time in almost a decade.

We're counting on your support to continue providing you free and frequent coverage of progressive issues that matter to Texans.

Help us build a website that is as great as the content we publish on it.



Texas Voter ID Trial Round Up Day 3


by: Edward Garris

Thu Jul 12, 2012 at 11:00 AM CDT


Day 3 of the Texas Voter ID trial is over.  What happened?

The Austin American-Statesman is running an Associated Press report stating that Daron Shaw testified that the voter ID law would not have an impact on voter turnout.  

According to pretrial filings by the state of Texas, Daron Shaw is a professor at the University of Texas and

"an expert on whether S.B. 14 will have a discriminatory effect on minority voters and on the popular support for photo voter identification laws.  As disclosed in his reports, Professor Shaw concludes that photo voter identification laws do not suppress voter turnout, thus those laws do not abridge or deny the right to vote, much less suppress voter turnout on account of race or membership in a language minority group."

According to the AP report in the Statesman, "Shaw said he had worked as a political strategist for both of President George W. Bush's presidential campaigns."

Also testifying on Wednesday, according to Reuters, was Rev. Peter Johnson, "a Southern civil rights leader who has worked for decades to help black Americans access polls."  The Reuters report stated that in his testimony, Rev. Johnson stated that racism was still "rife" in Texas from top to bottom and that the voter ID law was a manifestation of this.

And according to a report from the San Antonio Express-News, Sen. Rodney Ellis countered the State's evidence, asserting that the purpose of the voter ID law was to lessen voter minority turnout.

According to the article, he testified:

"They knew what they were doing, and they intended to do it.

"This bill has everything to do with race."

The trial is expected to wrap up this week.  The United States is expected to show that the Texas voter ID law imposes a substantial burden on voters; will suppress minority voter turnout; and has a discriminatory purpose, especially as it will make it more difficult for Hispanic and black voters to reach the polls, if this law is upheld.  Texas is attempting to show that the law will not deny or abridge the right to vote on account of race or color, does not impose a legally significant burden on any voter, and will not decrease voter turnout.  The state is also striving to show that there is ample voter fraud in Texas, and that the law was not enacted with a discriminatory purpose.

ADVERTISEMENT


Copyright Burnt Orange Report, all rights reserved.
Do not republish without express written permission.


Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Connect With BOR
    

2014 Texas Elections
Follow BOR for who's in, who's out, and who's up.

Candidate Tracker:
-- Statewide Races
-- Congressional Races
-- State Senate Races
-- State Rep. Races
-- SBOE Races
-- Austin City Council

Click here for all 2014 Elections coverage

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Texas Blue Pages

Texas Blue Pages
A career network for progressives.

Advertisement

Shared On Facebook

Burnt Orange Reporters
Editor and Publisher:
Katherine Haenschen

Senior Staff Writers:
Genevieve Cato
Joe Deshotel
Ben Sherman

Staff Writers:
Omar Araiza
Emily Cadik
Phillip Martin
Natalie San Luis
Katie Singh
Joseph Vogas

Founder:
Byron LaMasters

Blogger Emeritus:
Karl-Thomas Musselman

Read staff bios here.

Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox