Home

About
- Who We Are
- Community Guidelines
- Right to Respond

Advertising on BOR
- Advertise on BOR
- Buy on all Texas Blogs

Advertisements

Search




Advanced Search


Texas Senate Showdown: Dewhurst vs. Cruz, Sadler vs. Yarbrough


by: Ben Sherman

Thu May 31, 2012 at 04:02 PM CDT


Republicans

On Tuesday, Texas voters added another round to this Senate brawl. Ted Cruz's gambit to ride a wave of corporate Tea Party money (don't worry; that's not a contradiction anymore) all the way to a runoff against Dewhurst worked. The Lt. Governor was held at 44.6%, which is 5.4% fewer than what he needed to avoid a runoff.

Let more dogs out. Dewhurst previewed his runoff strategy at his morning-after press conference, telling reporters that Cruz is just "another lawyer funded by Washington special interests," and framing the race between "a lawyer who talks, a businessman who does." Dewhurst added: "If you like Texas, you're going to love what David Dewhurst is going to do for you in Washington," he said. Referring to himself in third-person is not the best strategy for a candidate who has almost no human characteristics, but at least Dewhurst knows he must inject some energy into his runoff candidacy.

Cruz told reporters that his strategy of "reaching out 18-hours a day, seven days a week to the grass roots activists of Texas" will not change for the runoff. He challenged Dewhurst to five debates before the July 31 runoff election. Dewhurst responded, "I don't know why Mr. Cruz would limit debating me. Is he scared? I'm not going to limit the debates I have with Mr. Cruz to only five." Cruz said he's fine with Dewhurst wanting to "up the ante" but added that the questions should come from voters, not "hand-picked moderators." We can expect a new round of ads and angles of attacks from both campaigns very soon.

Watch your head for the next nine weeks; Republican mud is about to be slung all over Texas.

Democrats

For months, this series ignored Grady Yarbrough, who's running as a Democrat for Senate. On Tuesday, Yarbrough surprised many and gained enough votes to place second, earning him a spot in the runoff against Paul Sadler. Yarbrough is a perennial candidate who has run as a Democrat and a Republican before. He has no funding, nor an apparent website. His is not a serious candidacy, and so he did not earn the attention of this series or just about any other coverage of the Democratic primary.

How did he win 25.8% of the vote? Well, many may have wrongly assumed he's related to Ralph Yarborough, a progressive Texas senator from the mid-twentieth century. Second, none of the Democratic candidates had much money to communicate any sort of message. Many Democrats no doubt went into the booth and selected a name from their party's ticket. Addie Allen, a female candidate with similarly nonexistent money and messaging, earned 22.9% of the vote, with an undoubtedly significant component of that support coming from her female name. Sean Hubbard ran a worthy campaign with what resources he had, earning the endorsements of BOR and several other voices in Texas progressive politics, but ended up with only 16.1% of the vote.

Sadler vs. Yarbrough is no contest at all, but that doesn't mean you shouldn't come out and vote on July 31 for Sadler, a progressive expert on public education exponentially better prepared than any of the Republicans to be a worthy Texas senator.
 

ADVERTISEMENT


Tags: , , , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Sadler is not a "progressive" (0.00 / 0)
Paul Sadler is a terrific candidate. The state party should focus on spreading his message on education and not just generating demoralizing "pink noise" and distracting spam.

He is, in fact, a moderate, even conservative, Democrat. These stupid labels do him and us no good at all.

He is very credible on the GOP's greatest vulnerability in this state: That would be the damage inflicted on public education by the GOP -- not just funding but taxation very generally and the charter-school and text-book rackets.

Public education is only disreputable in big cities where the big districts are run as plantations by bond-lawyers on behalf of land developers, paper-hangers, and tax-farmers.

Fortunately, there are good reasons for low-income black and brown voters to support the Democratic ticket despite the party establishment's surrender of big city school districts to bi-partisan concession-tenders or, in the case of bond-lawyers, concession-holders.

In suburbs, public education is popular and the GOP is in trouble there.

Sadler could carry our entire ticket, if we could get out a coherent message and had a credible platform on (1) education, (2) environment, and (3) energy -- not a laundry-list of litmus tests.

John Robert BEHRMAN


Connect With BOR
Your source for Texas politics.

On Facebook: BOR
On Twitter: @BOR
On Tumblr: BOR
On Pinterest:
Rick Perry's Rental Mansion

Need A Vendor?
Check out BOR's Progressive Vendor Page for campaigns and non-profits.


Texas Blue Pages

Texas Blue Pages
A career network for progressives.

Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Shared On Facebook

Advertisement

Burnt Orange Reporters
Publisher: Karl-Thomas M.
Editor-in-Chief: Katherine H.
Contributor: Phillip M.
Senior Writer: Michael H.
Staff Writer: Ben S.
Staff Writer: Chaille J.
Staff Writer: Edward G.
Staff Writer: Emily C.
Staff Writer: Joe D.
Staff Writer: Nick H.
Staff Writer: Shelby A.
Founder: Byron L.

Read staff bios here.

Traffic Ratings
- Alexa Rating
- Quantcast Ratings
-
Syndication

Powered by: SoapBlox