Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
January 27, 2005Please consult your instruction manualsBy Jim DallasThe Houston Press has an article on courtship. Courtship, as opposed to dating. Courtship, as in, her dad is the boss. Not that I'm about to emulate Little House On The Prairie, as one of the interviewed courtship families does. But at the very least, some tacit parental approval just seems absolutely essential to any kind of serious relationship. And it just seems that the older I get, the more "anything goes" seems to be the new rule of romance. And I find that irksome. I can certainly identify with these sentiments:
On the other hand, I think there's a real problem here along the blurry line between social and serious relationships. Why should a young adult, as one girl had to, consult her father before seeing a movie? As such, I give a hearty "hear hear" to the voices of sweet moderation:
I think there's two underlying values in this courtship thing. The first is one I can endorse: that relationships ought to be taken seriously. The second is one is essentially extreme patriarchy, to the point where I think just about everybody, even most squares, is a little queasy. At any rate, if I find that I am enamored with a young lass who's committed to this courtship idea, I'll respect that. Provided of course that her old man doesn't run my Kerry-voting, peacenik, rap-listening, baby-killing-tolerant, gay-loving, non-fundamentalist, non-church-attending rear end out the door with his twelve gauge first (not to play on stereotypes, of course, but I will take at face value the claim in the article that most adherents are socially conservative Bible literalists). In other news, Metro Transit is gonna let us pack while riding the bus:
Dallas DART already allows concealed weapons. I'm sure that we can all agree that this is a great victory for freedom in America; lest any tyrants have a break-down or car accident and need to take the bus, patriots will stand ready to secure the liberties of their fellow mass-transit passengers. Posted by Jim Dallas at January 27, 2005 03:51 AM | TrackBackComments
Guess we'll have to add another verse to "Wheels on the Bus" for the kids. Posted by: KCB at January 27, 2005 08:06 AMI think this actually seems fair. Only allowing concealed weapons in private modes of transportation discriminates against those that can only afford public transit. Posted by: brooks at January 27, 2005 08:58 AM"I had always struggled with the concept of dating -- there didn't seem to be any rules or guidelines," he says. "I'm an engineer. I like rules and systems." So this guy has problems with having a functional 1 on 1 relationship with a woman, and wants to be able to follow somone else rules with regards to developing a relationship??? People who cant interact with a potential partner without a set of guidelines, ought not be having relationships. This isnt the 1800's. If you think rules and systems are gonna help you have a relationship, I shudder. Posted by: Roycommi at January 27, 2005 01:18 PMI ,too, read the article about courtship in the Press last night. Though Jim has some good points about valuing relationships, I came away from reading the article with a yucky feeling. It's mostly about how males can dominate females, and how the females should submit to the wishes of their father. No where in the article did any of the interviewed say that a boy suitor of the daughter had to consult the mother. And that picture of the Crank family (no I'm not making that name up!), had the women all dressed in unflattering dresses and with their hair pulled back, a la Little House on the Prairie. I told the partner that we fought the Taliban to give women the right not to wear burkas, and then there's people in this state who impose the same belief systems on their families. Yuck, yuck, and double yuck! Posted by: grnwayrob at January 27, 2005 04:45 PMPost a comment
|
|