Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
November 12, 2004Texas vs. MassachusettsBy Byron LaMastersTexas's candidate may have beaten Massachusetts's candidate for President, but that doesn't stop Boston Globe columnist Ellen Goodman from rightfully mocking Texas for our uncommonly stupid state board of education:
I was also amused by the "lifelong" addition to the definition of marriage in our Texas textbooks. Considering how pathetic heterosexuals (as a whole) in this country are at having their "lifelong unions" last a lifetime, it's particularly ironic. Yet, somehow the threat to marriage lies with gays and lesbians. Posted by Byron LaMasters at November 12, 2004 08:06 PM | TrackBackComments
I wrote about this a while back, unfortunately, I had been drinking so I was very angry. It's one of the reasons I'm glad Paige is resigning, but I'm not all that hopeful for a big change. Republicans don't need to be in the business of education, especially if they are really concerned that their enemy is the "educated elite." Posted by: Nate at November 12, 2004 10:32 PMThere's no surprise here. The people who's concern for "values" enabled George Bush to retake the Presidency have a mission here, and it's becoming clear what they want: Through subjugation of our education and legal systems, these conservatives would like nothing less than turning our country into their own little fundamentalist state. Posted by: Stewart at November 13, 2004 09:26 AMWhat does it matter. As former Dem. VP Candidate Geraldine Ferraro says "Where is all the talent in this country? Its on both sides, the Northeast corridor." That means that y'all at UT are not talented. You guys want to quit school now? They always know best in the northeast. If we followed their lead, all things would be perfect, everywhere. UP there there are soooo many private schools. Why is that? Public school too good for them. Just for the poor or less privileged. I've been married for 27 years. I surely don't want these other relationships equated to marriage. Marriage is a special relationship ALWAYS between man and a woman. Sure there are many divorces, not a good thing. Make responsible decisions and stick with them. For better or worse, remember your vows. Posted by: peter at November 13, 2004 10:29 AMOMG that's rich. Abstinence only textbooks? Avoid STD's by getting plenty of rest? Wow. Posted by: political at November 13, 2004 04:26 PMPublic school too good for them. Just for the poor or less privileged. You must be joking. The wealthy elite who live in the cities send their kids to private schools, but that's a tiny, tiny proportion compared to the massive numbers of suburbanites in places like N.J., Ct., and suburban New York who send their kids to excellent public schools. Well, I am a Northeast Corridor girl who was sent to wonderful public schools. And I am curious, why is hetero marriage superior to a gay relationship? Both pairs love and care enough about each other to try and make it work. I'm sorry, but if gay marriage is a threat to a man and a woman, then the man and woman should see a counselor. Posted by: Andrea M. at November 13, 2004 08:33 PMAndrea, Is your mother special? Your father? You're not here without them. You're not who you are without them, Both of them. You're special because of them. It's one of the natural results of a union between man and woman. You don't get water by combining hydrogen with hydrogen, nor oxygen with oxygen. Our survival is in question without this marriage. Posted by: peter at November 14, 2004 07:09 AMPeter, Whose survival are you worried about? Don't worry about gay marriages. Heterosexuals will continue to get married, get divorced or stay together, and have kids in and out of wedlock, therefore propegating the species. Gay marriage will not affect this. I don't think Adam and Steve down the street having their commitment to each other made legal, etc, will stop the culture of weddings and family in the country. Trust me on this. I am curious--what about heterosexuals who don't want children? Should THEY not be married? Do they not deserve a significant other? I am not trying to be rude or sarcastic, but I am curious about your point of view. How about sterile men and women? BTW, a lot of the country looks down on Texas--it's not just Geraldine Ferarro. I have lived in 4 states besides this one, and the Texas mockery is everywhere, partly for the reasons stated earlier. Posted by: Andrea M. at November 14, 2004 07:27 PMPost a comment
|
|