Burnt Orange Report


News, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas







Support the TDP!





November 12, 2004

Texas vs. Massachusetts

By Byron LaMasters

Texas's candidate may have beaten Massachusetts's candidate for President, but that doesn't stop Boston Globe columnist Ellen Goodman from rightfully mocking Texas for our uncommonly stupid state board of education:


The Texas Board of Education has now given its educational seal of approval to what may soon be dubbed Red Sex Ed.

The big news is the state's successful demand that textbook publishers change the description of marriage between "two people" to marriage between "a man and a woman." They also ordered that marriage be defined as "a lifelong union between a husband and a wife."

Frankly, I found the "lifelong" description charming considering that the Lone Star State has one of the highest divorce rates in the country. Massachusetts, by the way, has the lowest divorce rate in the country. We are so fond of marriage that we want everyone to do it.

But never mind all that. The real heart of the textbook controversy is whether Texas students should learn about contraception. And the answer is no. Texas has now officially gone to abstinence-only textbooks. The students are learning the ABCs of sex ed without the C. And as Texas, the second-largest book buyer in the country, goes, so may go the nation.

Only one of the four approved books even mentions contraceptives. The altered lessons teach students how to avoid sexually transmitted diseases in many ways — including "getting plenty of rest" — but not by using condoms. One actually suggests using latex gloves to avoid contact with blood but says nothing about using latex . . . you get the idea.


I was also amused by the "lifelong" addition to the definition of marriage in our Texas textbooks. Considering how pathetic heterosexuals (as a whole) in this country are at having their "lifelong unions" last a lifetime, it's particularly ironic. Yet, somehow the threat to marriage lies with gays and lesbians.

Posted by Byron LaMasters at November 12, 2004 08:06 PM | TrackBack

Comments

I wrote about this a while back, unfortunately, I had been drinking so I was very angry.

It's one of the reasons I'm glad Paige is resigning, but I'm not all that hopeful for a big change.

Republicans don't need to be in the business of education, especially if they are really concerned that their enemy is the "educated elite."

Posted by: Nate at November 12, 2004 10:32 PM

There's no surprise here. The people who's concern for "values" enabled George Bush to retake the Presidency have a mission here, and it's becoming clear what they want: Through subjugation of our education and legal systems, these conservatives would like nothing less than turning our country into their own little fundamentalist state.

Posted by: Stewart at November 13, 2004 09:26 AM

What does it matter. As former Dem. VP Candidate Geraldine Ferraro says "Where is all the talent in this country? Its on both sides, the Northeast corridor." That means that y'all at UT are not talented. You guys want to quit school now? They always know best in the northeast. If we followed their lead, all things would be perfect, everywhere. UP there there are soooo many private schools. Why is that? Public school too good for them. Just for the poor or less privileged.

I've been married for 27 years. I surely don't want these other relationships equated to marriage. Marriage is a special relationship ALWAYS between man and a woman. Sure there are many divorces, not a good thing. Make responsible decisions and stick with them. For better or worse, remember your vows.

Posted by: peter at November 13, 2004 10:29 AM

OMG that's rich. Abstinence only textbooks? Avoid STD's by getting plenty of rest? Wow.

Posted by: political at November 13, 2004 04:26 PM

Public school too good for them. Just for the poor or less privileged.

You must be joking. The wealthy elite who live in the cities send their kids to private schools, but that's a tiny, tiny proportion compared to the massive numbers of suburbanites in places like N.J., Ct., and suburban New York who send their kids to excellent public schools.
You see a lot more private and religious schools in states that don't consider education as much of a priority.

Posted by: Brittain33 at November 13, 2004 04:48 PM

Well, I am a Northeast Corridor girl who was sent to wonderful public schools. And I am curious, why is hetero marriage superior to a gay relationship? Both pairs love and care enough about each other to try and make it work. I'm sorry, but if gay marriage is a threat to a man and a woman, then the man and woman should see a counselor.

Posted by: Andrea M. at November 13, 2004 08:33 PM

Andrea, Is your mother special? Your father? You're not here without them. You're not who you are without them, Both of them. You're special because of them. It's one of the natural results of a union between man and woman. You don't get water by combining hydrogen with hydrogen, nor oxygen with oxygen. Our survival is in question without this marriage.

Posted by: peter at November 14, 2004 07:09 AM

Peter,
As I am a Northeasterner, I guess you can assume that I KNOW about biology, and I am fairly certain that my parents did not produce asexually. At least, not as far as I know. And yes, they are special people. Thanks for asking.

Whose survival are you worried about? Don't worry about gay marriages. Heterosexuals will continue to get married, get divorced or stay together, and have kids in and out of wedlock, therefore propegating the species. Gay marriage will not affect this. I don't think Adam and Steve down the street having their commitment to each other made legal, etc, will stop the culture of weddings and family in the country. Trust me on this.

I am curious--what about heterosexuals who don't want children? Should THEY not be married? Do they not deserve a significant other? I am not trying to be rude or sarcastic, but I am curious about your point of view. How about sterile men and women?

BTW, a lot of the country looks down on Texas--it's not just Geraldine Ferarro. I have lived in 4 states besides this one, and the Texas mockery is everywhere, partly for the reasons stated earlier.

Posted by: Andrea M. at November 14, 2004 07:27 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?








May 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        


About Us
About/Contact
Advertising Policies

Donate

Tip Jar!



Archives
Recent Entries
Categories
BOR Edu.
BOR News
BOR Politics
Linked to BOR!
Polling
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers
DFW Bogs
DMN Blog
In the Pink Texas
Inside the Texas Capitol
The Lasso
Pol State TX Archives
Quorum Report Daily Buzz
George Strong Political Analysis
Texas Law Blog
Texas Monthly
Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
TX GOP Blogs
Daily Reads
College Blogs
GLBT Blogs
More Reads
BOR Webrings
Election Returns
Texas Media
World News



Powered by
Movable Type 3.15