Burnt Orange Report


News, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas







Support the TDP!





November 10, 2004

New Quorum Rules in the State House?

By Byron LaMasters

With all this talk of Republicans gearing up to try and steal HD 149 for Talmadge Heflin on the house floor, one thing immediately entered my mind -- breaking quorum. It would certainly be unlikely, but I can't say it didn't enter my mind. Well, of course, Republicans want to change the rules on that. They talked about doing it last year, but I'd be surprised if they don't take it seriously this year. You know, after stealing the election for Heflin, they'll probably want to re-re-redistrict Chet Edwards out of office (ok, I'll shut up before giving them too many ideas). The Monitor reports that the bill has already been filed:

A Republican state legislator wants to force his Democratic colleagues to remain inside state lines during the next legislative session, in order to avoid boycotts like the ones seen in both the Texas Senate and House last year.

State Rep. Dan Branch, RDallas, filed a resolution on Monday that seeks to change the number of legislators needed to form a quorum from two-thirds to a majority. [...]

If Branch’s resolution survives the session, the issue would be presented to Texas voters in a constitutional amendment election set for Nov. 8, 2005.


From the looks of it, this is a constitutional amendment which would require support of two-thirds of the house to pass -- something tells me it's unlikely that Republicans could find three -- not to mention the needed thirteen Democrats to give them a two-thirds majority. State Sen. Juan "Chuy" Hinojosa (D-McAllen) certainly doesn't like the idea:


"It doesn’t make sense — he would need two-thirds to pass it and why in the world would I vote to give up my rights? I don’t think it has any support in the House or the Senate," Hinojosa said.


I do think Republicans will do something to change the quorum rules (or enact punishments for lawmakers who choose to break quorum) that does not require a constitutional amendment. I'm not sure exactly what they can and cannot do regarding rule changes without a constitutional amendment, but I'm sure that I'll find out over the coming months.

Posted by Byron LaMasters at November 10, 2004 08:37 PM | TrackBack

Comments
Post a comment









Remember personal info?








May 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        


About Us
About/Contact
Advertising Policies

Donate

Tip Jar!



Archives
Recent Entries
Categories
BOR Edu.
BOR News
BOR Politics
Linked to BOR!
Polling
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers
DFW Bogs
DMN Blog
In the Pink Texas
Inside the Texas Capitol
The Lasso
Pol State TX Archives
Quorum Report Daily Buzz
George Strong Political Analysis
Texas Law Blog
Texas Monthly
Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
TX GOP Blogs
Daily Reads
College Blogs
GLBT Blogs
More Reads
BOR Webrings
Election Returns
Texas Media
World News



Powered by
Movable Type 3.15