Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
November 10, 2004Texas Cities "Mean" to HomelessBy Byron LaMastersNo shocker really. Texas is "mean" to children, gay and lesbians, students, the unemployed, the uninsured, the poor and the working class -- why would the homeless be any exception? The Dallas Morning News reports:
Nothin' like a little southern hospitality... Update: The full release on the study by the National Coalition for the Homeless is available here. Posted by Byron LaMasters at November 10, 2004 01:13 PM | TrackBackComments
"The coalition ranked Austin 10th on its mean city list in part because of a campaign to discourage people from giving spare change to panhandlers." Come on. I know scores of liberal homeless-advocacy organizations that discourage giving change to panhandlers. Studies have shown that upwards of 70% of these handouts to homeless individuals goes toward purchasing drugs or alcohol. This money could be spent much better in other places. Posted by: Mr. Mackey at November 10, 2004 01:33 PMYeah, I agree. I don't give money to homeless people for that very reason. If I'm spending money on alcohol, it'll be for myself and my friends -- not some random homeless guy. The Dallas homeless stuff seemed a bit more egregious though. The idea of criminalizing homelessness doesn't do anything to solve the problem. It only makes criminals out of people who have enough problems already. Posted by: Byron L at November 10, 2004 02:50 PMI've always wondered why there aren't more homeless in these southern areas compared to the north. I moved to the Waco area from Juneau Alaska last year and I definitely saw more homeless in Juneau than I do in Waco. When you think about the climate, that is absolutely nuts. There would be these homeless guys camped out in the woods all winter long in these tents and home-made shelters. This is in a city that averages over 100" of snow and has a downright hostile climate to be outside for at least 6 months of the year. I know one thing for certain. If I was homeless I'd head to some place like San Diego where the weather is nice and one can live outside with little effort for most of the year. But of course I undersand that most of these folks are victims of circumstance and really don't have the opportunity or resources to travel where they want. Posted by: Kent at November 10, 2004 03:32 PMThe idea of criminalizing homelessness doesn't do anything to solve the problem. It only makes criminals out of people who have enough problems already. That and the fact that a per se criminalization of homelessness would, in my opinion, violate the 8th Amendment based on the principle laid out in Robinson v California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962). Personally, I think Austin's approach to the homeless is a better approach with programs such as those by Caritas. Giving money to panhandlers only reinforces panhandling rather than providing a way out of homelessness. It shouldn't necessarily be about giving the homeless what they want (free money that can be spent on alcohol and drugs but insufficient to get a place to live, a job, etc) but rather what they need (the ability and self-motivation to get sustainable employment and housing). And some communities' solution (a one way bus ticket out of town) doesn't solve the problem. See the trouble in Atlanta in '96 when they tried to get the homeless out before the Olympics. Posted by: Craig at November 10, 2004 03:45 PMPost a comment
|
|