Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
October 14, 2004From the Rick Santorum Department of ScienceBy Byron LaMastersRick "man-on-dog" Santorum has a friend with the Young Conservatives of Texas UT-Chapter (it's not yet up on their site). Here's a portion of their press release regarding gay pride week:
The first paragraph simply makes no logical sense. It's the slippery slope argument that homosexuality leads to adultery that leads to polygamy that leads to incest that leads to man-on-dog at least in worldview of YCT and Rick Santorum. The second paragraph is flat out untrue. Basically every major respectable psychiatric, psychological and pediatric organization in the nation has said that homosexuality is not a genetic disorder. Time for YCT to do some research before writing another press release. Posted by Byron LaMasters at October 14, 2004 04:05 PM | TrackBackComments
Please don't suggest that College Republicans learn facts. They don't go to school to learn. They go to school to holler. Posted by: Scooter at October 14, 2004 04:33 PMI concur. Some people are lost causes. They don't go to college to grow up or to become cosmopolites (eh, not like I'm exactly cosmopolitan, but you know I don't have a burning hatred of the French, so I guess that's good enough). College is about more than career preparation. Posted by: Jim D at October 14, 2004 04:40 PMI would like to be able to say that I would be embarrassed for you guys to have this group say something that shows their own stupidity, ignorance and hate hail from your state...but I am from the same place as Rick "man-on-dog" Santorum (actually live only a few miles from the exteremely wealthy suburb of Pittsburgh he lived in when he was actually a resident of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.) Sadly, we all have our own crosses to bear. Keep up the great work! Posted by: Mike at October 14, 2004 04:41 PMHow did these YCT folks get into UT? Are the standards that low? Their first paragraph says basically homsexuality is a choice. Does that mean the members of YCT are heterosexual because they want to be? The YCT claims that homosexuality has been disproven to be a genetic disorder. Cite the study or studies. Are they sound? Any that they would cite would probably not be sound. They then say that "those suffering from this affliction have the ability to change." Really? Like John Paulk? The YCT claim to use logic, yet they do not. The "logic" they use is bassed on fallacies. Maybe they should spend more time in class instead of making up half-assed "agruments." Posted by: texprodigy at October 14, 2004 05:33 PMThe fact that a person is gay has nothing to do with the idea that morality is nothing more than a personal choice. Who came up with that argument? There are plenty of gays who behave within the bounds of Judeo-Christian morality (excepting the not completely convincing claim that the Bible prohibits homosexuality per se), they believe murder is wrong, we must show love to our neighbors, and the same love to our enemies, etc. Why do "Christians" pick one "sin" and say that if you do this, you are beyond the pale, yet all of us sin every day in uncountable ways. If you believe in their notions of morality, everyone needs to be forgiven on a daily basis. Why gay sinners are worse than others, I don't know. If homosexuality was somehow one of the worst things a person could do, don't you think it might be more promintently condemned in the Bible? Just a thought. What it all comes down to is these raving homo-phobes are terrified of anything that growing up in Plan or Highland Park or Sugar Land didn't prepare them for, so they respond with fear. These guys are scum. I hope they all have gay children and that this forces them to learn understanding of love of every human being. Posted by: utlaw guy at October 14, 2004 08:29 PMutlawguy wrote The fact that a person is gay has nothing to do with the idea that morality is nothing more than a personal choice. Who came up with that argument? There are plenty of gays who behave within the bounds of Judeo-Christian morality (excepting the not completely convincing claim that the Bible prohibits homosexuality per se), they believe murder is wrong, we must show love to our neighbors, and the same love to our enemies, etc. Why do "Christians" pick one "sin" and say that if you do this, you are beyond the pale, yet all of us sin every day in uncountable ways. If you believe in their notions of morality, everyone needs to be forgiven on a daily basis. Why gay sinners are worse than others, I don't know. If homosexuality was somehow one of the worst things a person could do, don't you think it might be more promintently condemned in the Bible? Just a thought. There's a fair amount of theology that holds that there are indeed different varieties of sin of lesser or greater magnitude. I could explain it further, but it would require sucking up all of the spare electrons in this area. Just start with Augustine and work your way forward. Posted by: Jonathan Sadow at October 15, 2004 03:35 AMothers will want, and get, more direct shows golf of emotion: "Proust/ used to weep over days south beach diet gone by," she asks the reader, "do you?" (Feb.) carmen electra Copyright 2000 Cahners Business Information.A pokemon professor of classics at McGill University brooke burke and the author of Autobiography of Red, a National final fantasy Book Critics Circle nominee, Carson has rapidly britney spears become one of North America's most acclaimed paris hilton Posted by: Michelle Vieth at October 29, 2004 08:10 PMPost a comment
|
|