Burnt Orange Report


News, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas







Support the TDP!





July 14, 2004

Kerry / Edwards Should have been there

By Byron LaMasters

They can't be at every vote, and this vote wasn't even close, but John Kerry and John Edwards should have come back to the U.S. Senate today to vote to end debate on the Federal Marriage Amendment. I understand that they're campaigning, and basically every gay and lesbian in America that doesn't hate themselve will be voting for them, but as a symbolic gesture, Kerry / Edwards should have cast their votes today to send a message that they won't stand for hate in the United States Senate.

Here's the Roll Call for the Hate Amendment. It lost 48-50, falling twelve votes short of continuing debate and 19 votes short of receiving the needed two-thirds vote to pass. So, basically - a crushing defeat for the right-wing hate machine.

These Republicans voted against hate. Write them. Commend them. They stood up against their President:

Campbell
Chaffee
Collins
McCain
Snowe
Sununu

These Democrats voted for hate, and not Democratic values. Write them an angry email:

Byrd
Miller
Nelson

I wanted to post on the Santorum that was spread on the Senate floor yesterday, whoops here's the link:


If you look at the socialist countries that have gone in the direction of destruction of the family, you only need to look at the imposition and heavy weight of government. Why? Because there is no one there to pick up the pieces. You can say, if I had known, if I had only known. Every day we get up and tell ourselves lies, so we can live. The problem is this lie hurts the future lives of millions of children in America. And they are going to have to live with the consequences of the lie you tell.


That's it. Gay marriage is the first step towards socialism. If I could have a penny for every time a Republican equated some public policy or another to socialism, I'd be a rich man.


I do not see how anyone can possibly imagine a whole nation without whole families. Yet we will choose tomorrow to risk everything. Think about this. We will choose tomorrow to risk everything. Why? What is worth this risk? What is worth this experiment in sociology heretofore unseen? What is worth that much?


Nothing like a little hyperbole to top it all off. FMA is defeated. The end is near. Armageddon is upon us. Red alert. Judgement day. Save the children. Hide the babies and vote Bush / Cheney in November.

Posted by Byron LaMasters at July 14, 2004 03:22 PM | TrackBack

Comments

I don't know. Somehow I think the work of ensuring that Bush & Co. don't have another four years to do their damage may outweigh the need to vote on a cloture vote that had no chance of passing anyway.

Besides, both Kerry and Edwards have made it abundantly clear where they stand on the issue.

Posted by: Len at July 14, 2004 04:04 PM

As stated on Kos:

"This vote was for cloture, to close off debate and vote on the actual amendment. There are Republicans that voted to shut off debate that indicated they would vote against the amendment in an up-or-down vote. And both real Democrats have indicated they would've voted against the amendment as well."

So save your angry e-mail to Sens. Byrd and Nelson.

Posted by: DJ at July 14, 2004 04:22 PM

I agree. But for symbolic purposes I would have liked to have seen them there. I'm not really angry over it, and I understand, but I am slightly disappointed.

Posted by: Byron L at July 14, 2004 05:00 PM

In the slightly altered words of some brain-dead Sportscenter anchor, Byron, "Don't hate the playa, hate the stupid, discriminatory, bigoted, potentially Constitution-altering game played by jackasses like Santorum."

Posted by: norbizness at July 14, 2004 05:11 PM

This was procedural. Both candidates said they would have returned for the actual vote on the bill, which would have been the next day.

Posted by: Joey Jo-Jo Shabadoo at July 14, 2004 06:45 PM

I want to take a second to defend Senator Byrd. Over his long tenure in the Senate, we have seen this man evolve before our eyes. He's one of my heroes.

A relic of the Old Democratic Party--remember his KKK membership?--he has managed to keep up with the progressive movement in the party. He has said that he would vote against the amendment! Pretty commendable for a man in his 80s, from West Virginia, who was once a member of the Klan! (For Senator Byrd, hating President Bush is far more important that the South's old racist past.)

Posted by: Brian in California at July 14, 2004 07:21 PM

If you look at the socialist countries that have gone in the direction of destruction of the family, you only need to look at the imposition and heavy weight of government.

What an idiot. How he is unable to see that outlawing a form of free association is exactly what he's supposedly railing against?

Posted by: Charles Hueter at July 14, 2004 11:17 PM

This really was inside the Beltway nonsense that made the Republicans look like fools. Give our boy John Cornyn credit - he knows who supports him and who put him in office. He sucked up big-time to the right wing religionists. But it seems clear that most people are tired of this obsession that the GOP and the Christian Right have with homosexual marriage, and are ready to move on to more important issues, like cutting back the number of American men and women coming home from Iraq in boxes.

Posted by: Dennis at July 15, 2004 04:03 AM

It's only the lazy Republicans that are totally obsessed with the gay marriage debate. They somehow think that the neighbor around the corner is going to have a direct impact into their daily lives and the raising of their children. It's a shame that they feel that a neighbor, a stranger on the street or a t.v. charactor has a greater influence on THEIR family and their future children's family than they do. Doesn't say much for them as parents.

Posted by: GT at July 15, 2004 12:28 PM

Maybe the Republicans should send some extra funds to Mass. so they can afford more divorce courts, since as we all know, gay marriage there is proabably destroying heterosexual marriages at an alarming rate!

Posted by: grnwayrob at July 15, 2004 05:09 PM

Remember also that cloture needs 60 votes; abstention is effectively a no vote. Making a simple symbolic gesture on a cloture vote that didn't even get a majority, especially with Kerry one of the brave few who voted against DoMA, is not worth the time.

Posted by: Christopher Davis at July 15, 2004 05:58 PM

To the person who said that Sen. Byrd was his hero -- he was one of the prominent cosponsors of the Defense of Marriage Act in 1996 and made a truly disgusting speech in defense of it.

Posted by: Rebecca at July 19, 2004 02:09 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?








March 2005
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    


About Us
About/Contact
Advertising Policies

Donate

Tip Jar!



Archives
Recent Entries
Categories
BOR Edu.
BOR News
BOR Politics
Linked to BOR!
Polling
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers
DFW Bogs
DMN Blog
In the Pink Texas
Inside the Texas Capitol
The Lasso
Pol State TX Archives
Quorum Report Daily Buzz
George Strong Political Analysis
Texas Law Blog
Texas Monthly
Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
TX GOP Blogs
Daily Reads
College Blogs
GLBT Blogs
More Reads
BOR Webrings
Election Returns
Texas Media
World News



Powered by
Movable Type 3.15